Alphabeta Math
Physics theoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Finite spectral periodic Bose/Fermi gas

Physical scope

A finite-volume ideal gas defined spectrally on the integer momentum labels of a periodic box, with dispersion alpha|2pi k/L|^2 and a finite internal degeneracy g. It proves finite grand trace, exact mode means and continuum density/energy limits for fixed mu<0 in the Bose case or finite mu in the Fermi case. It does not identify this spectral definition with a differential operator domain, claim a finite-volume phase transition, or establish an empirical gas model.

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice ACω (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)) and adopt the model preparation of Quantum statistics and model equilibrium preparation. Let d≥1, L>0 in m, m>0 in kg, ℏ>0 in J s, kB>0 in J K−1, and T>0 in K. Put V=Ld, α=ℏ2/(2m), β=(kBT)−1, and let g∈N count distinct internal modes. Put Λ=Zd×{1,…,g}, enumerated by increasing ∥k∥∞:=max⁡1≤j≤d∣kj∣, then lexicographically in k and increasingly in s. Define the one-particle Hilbert space h=ℓ2(Λ) with coordinate basis ek,s. Its spectral energy multiplier is h1ek,s=ϵkek,s for ϵk=α∣2πk/L∣2, on the maximal domain D(h1)={c∈ℓ2(Λ):∑k,sϵk2∣ck,s∣2<∞}; the real diagonal multiplier is self-adjoint on this domain by the coordinate adjoint calculation in Step 2.1 of Explicit diagonal Fock domains and occupation trace.

Let ΩB be the finite-support maps n:Λ→N0, and let ΩF be the finite-support maps n:Λ→{0,1}, with occupation bases ∣n⟩ of the Bose or Fermi Fock space as in Occupation bases and actual CCR/CAR domains. Use Ω±=ΩB for bosons and Ω±=ΩF for fermions. Define the finite sums E(n):=∑(k,s)∈Λϵknk,s and ∣n∣:=∑(k,s)∈Λnk,s, and the mode occupation random variables Nk,s(n):=nk,s. The diagonal many-body Hamiltonian and total number operators act by H∣n⟩=E(n)∣n⟩ and N∣n⟩=∣n∣∣n⟩ on their maximal domains D(H)={c∈ℓ2(Ω±):∑n∈Ω±E(n)2∣cn∣2<∞},D(N)={c∈ℓ2(Ω±):∑n∈Ω±∣n∣2∣cn∣2<∞}, as self-adjoint operators on those domains by Explicit diagonal Fock domains and occupation trace.

For bosons take μ<0; for fermions take any finite μ∈R. In either case the grand trace Ξβ,μ,L:=∑n∈Ω±e−β(E(n)−μ∣n∣) is finite and positive, and its normalized occupation law is Pβ,μ,L(n):=Ξβ,μ,L−1e−β(E(n)−μ∣n∣). For a Pβ,μ,L-integrable real random variable X, write Eβ,μ,LX:=∑n∈Ω±Pβ,μ,L(n)X(n); if X has finite second moment, set Var⁡β,μ,L(X):=Eβ,μ,L[(X−Eβ,μ,LX)2]. In particular, Eβ,μ,LN=∑nPβ,μ,L(n)∣n∣ and Eβ,μ,LH=∑nPβ,μ,L(n)E(n). Under this additive diagonal Hamiltonian its mode occupations are independent, and nˉk,s:=Eβ,μ,LNk,s=1eβ(ϵk−μ)∓1,Var⁡β,μ,L(Nk,s)=nˉk,s(1±nˉk,s), with the upper sign choice in the denominator interpreted as − for bosons and + for fermions (equivalently the variance is nˉ(1+nˉ) for bosons and nˉ(1−nˉ) for fermions). For fixed β,μ in these regimes, as L→∞, Eβ,μ,LNV→g(2π)d∫Rddpeβ(α∣p∣2−μ)∓1,Eβ,μ,LHV→g(2π)d∫Rdα∣p∣2 dpeβ(α∣p∣2−μ)∓1, The continuum limits are conditional model deductions; they assert no thermalization or measured density.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: ACω; α>0 in J m2, p in m−1, μ and ϵk in J, β in J−1, T in K, kB in J K−1, and V in md.

[A1]

Quantum statistics and model equilibrium preparation: Bose/Fermi sector selection and the trace-Gibbs preparation are adopted; a finite positive trace is required.

[F1]

Explicit diagonal Fock domains and occupation trace, Statement: the displayed diagonal multiplier has the exact domains, trace products, marginals, independence, and mode mean/variance formulas under its q-summability hypotheses.

[F2]

Lattice Gaussian Riemann limits and the singular Bose endpoint, Statement: Gaussian lattice sums and polynomially weighted occupation sums are finite, and their scaled Riemann sums converge for μ<0 in the Bose case and finite μ in the Fermi case.

Proof

1.1givenF1F2algebra

Set h=2π/L and qk=eβμe−βαh2∣k∣2. The Gaussian lattice bound from [F2] gives ∑k,sqk<∞. For bosons, qk≤eβμ<1, so the uniform gap and summability hypotheses in [F1] hold. For fermions they hold with qk>0; only finitely many modes have ϵk<μ, since that inequality confines k to a bounded ball in the discrete lattice. The one-particle real diagonal multiplier has the stated weighted-square domain by the coefficient and adjoint test in [F1].

2.1step 1.1F1A1

Apply [F1] to these exact mode weights. Its finite positive product is the trace of e−β(H−μN); normalization yields the stated independent geometric or Bernoulli mode laws. The means and variances are those displayed in the Statement.

3.1step 2.1F2algebra∎

With p=hk, one has V−1=(h/2π)d. Therefore V−1∑k,snˉk=g(2π)−dhd∑kf(p) and V−1∑k,sϵknˉk=g(2π)−dhd∑kα∣p∣2f(p). Both limits follow from [F2], using weights s=0 and s=2. The polynomial tail bound also makes these number and energy densities finite.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources