Alphabeta Math
Physics theoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedverified 2026-10-15 (gpt-6-luna, gpt-6.1-sol, and delegated Codex review/repair agents; see completed run evidence)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Lyapunov stability of Schwarzschild circular orbits in the fixed-angular-momentum radial system

Physical scope

Conditional conclusion of the adopted Schwarzschild vacuum and free-fall model for the one-dimensional timelike radial subsystem at fixed angular momentum. Lyapunov stability is only for the reduced state (r, dr/dτ); it is not stability of the full spacetime orbit, against angular-momentum perturbations, or against radiation reaction, self-force, finite-size effects, or observations.

Statement

Adopt the Schwarzschild vacuum exterior model with m∗>0, s=2GNm∗/c2>0 and f(r)=1−s/r, together with its ideal-free-fall rule that a massive test body follows a future timelike geodesic. For a fixed angular-momentum magnitude ℓ>0, set

Wℓ(r)=f(r)(c2+ℓ2r2),r>s.

The equatorial reduced radial system is

r˙=w,w˙=−12Wℓ′(r),

where dot denotes proper-time derivative and ℓ is held fixed. Use SI: r,s are lengths in metres, proper time τ is in seconds, w=dr/dτ and c are speeds in metres per second, ℓ has units square metres per second, and Wℓ has units squared speed. Lyapunov stability means the Euclidean definition of Equilibria, Lyapunov stability and asymptotic stability of an autonomous first-order system applied to the dimensionless state (q,v)=(r/s,w/c) and time T=cτ/s. Equivalently, the distance between radial states is d((r,w),(r~,w~))=((r−r~)/s)2+((w−w~)/c)2. For every circular timelike radius rc>3s/2, the corresponding equilibrium is

zc=(rc,0),ℓ2=c2src22rc−3s.

Then this equilibrium is Lyapunov stable in these dimensionless Euclidean coordinates when rc>3s, and is not Lyapunov stable when 3s/2<rc≤3s. At rc=3s the equilibrium is a stationary inflection of Wℓ, not a strict extremum, and is still not Lyapunov stable. These are conclusions about the reduced radial system at fixed ℓ only.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The stated Schwarzschild vacuum model, its free-fall rule, c,s>0, a fixed ℓ>0, and the reduced radial state space (s,∞)×R.

[A1]

The adopted Schwarzschild model uses the exterior datum and ideal freely falling massive test bodies follow future timelike geodesics; this is a model assumption, not an empirical premise (The Schwarzschild exterior vacuum model: field law, static clock readings and the mass parameter, Adopted clock, free-fall and light-ray assumptions of the classical gravitational framework).

[F1]

For an equatorial timelike geodesic with fixed conserved angular momentum ℓ, the radial equation is r˙2=e2−Wℓ(r) and, on a radial interval, r¨=−Wℓ′(r)/2 (Conserved quantities and equatorial radial reduction of timelike geodesics of the Schwarzschild exterior model).

[F2]

A circular timelike orbit at rc>3s/2 has ℓ2=c2src2/(2rc−3s); the published supplier defines Vℓ=Wℓ/2 and gives Vℓ′′(rc)=c2s(rc−3s)/(rc3(2rc−3s)), so Wℓ′′(rc)=2c2s(rc−3s)/(rc3(2rc−3s)) at fixed ℓ. Its sign gives a strict local minimum for rc>3s and a strict local maximum for 3s/2<rc<3s (Circular timelike geodesics, their radial-potential stability threshold, and the photon sphere at r = 3s/2 clause (c)).

[F3]

Lyapunov stability in (q,v) quantifies over every sufficiently small dimensionless Euclidean initial-state ball and every maximal solution, requiring forward existence for all T≥0 and continued containment in a prescribed ball (Equilibria, Lyapunov stability and asymptotic stability of an autonomous first-order system).

[F4]

The smooth radial vector field is locally Lipschitz, so every initial state has a unique local solution (Picard-Lindelöf local existence and uniqueness for first-order systems).

[F5]

A solution of an autonomous locally Lipschitz ODE whose state remains in a compact subset of its open state domain near a finite endpoint extends beyond that endpoint (Compact continuation for locally Lipschitz ODEs: a solution whose graph stays in a compact subset of the domain near a finite endpoint extends past it clause 2).

Proof

technique · reduce geodesic motion to the fixed-$\ell$ radial ODE, use its conserved one-dimensional energy, and apply the definition of Lyapunov stability plus compact continuation
1.1givenF1F2F4algebra

By [F1], the reduced vector field is Fℓ(r,w)=(w,−Wℓ′(r)/2) on the open set (s,∞)×R. It is smooth there and [F4] gives a unique local solution through every state; uniqueness lets one glue all solutions through the same initial state on the union of their intervals to obtain its maximal solution. The change of variables (q,v,T)=(r/s,w/c,cτ/s) gives dq/dT=v and dv/dT=−sWℓ′(sq)/(2c2) on (1,∞)×R. This invertible scaling preserves maximality, compact containment and existence for all nonnegative time. Differentiating Wℓ=f(c2+ℓ2/r2) gives Wℓ′=c2s/r2−2ℓ2/r3+3sℓ2/r4; substituting the circular value of ℓ2 from [F2] yields Wℓ′(rc)=0, so Fℓ(rc,0)=0. Along every solution, Hℓ(r,w):=12(w2+Wℓ(r)) satisfies dHℓ/dτ=w(−Wℓ′/2)+(Wℓ′/2)w=0. Thus Hℓ is constant on each solution interval.

2.1step 1.1F2F3F4F5algebra

Suppose rc>3s. By [F2], Wℓ′′(rc)>0, so continuity gives an interval about rc on which Wℓ′′>0. Since Wℓ′(rc)=0, the derivative is negative to the left and positive to the right there; hence Wℓ has a strict local minimum. Fix any dimensionless phase-space radius ε>0 whose closed ball about (rc/s,0) lies in (1,∞)×R. Choose a length 0<η<sε/2 so [rc−η,rc+η]⊂(s,∞) and both boundary values of Wℓ exceed Wℓ(rc). By continuity of Hℓ, choose 0<δ≤ε so every state at distance d<δ from zc has ∣r−rc∣<η/2, energy below both boundary potential halves, and Hℓ−Wℓ(rc)/2<c2ε2/8. Conservation in 1.1 prevents such a solution from reaching either radial boundary, since there Hℓ≥Wℓ(rc±η)/2. Inside the resulting radial interval Wℓ(r)≥Wℓ(rc), so w2/2=Hℓ−Wℓ(r)/2<c2ε2/8 and ∣w∣/c<ε/2. The state stays in a compact subset of the open domain; [F5] rules out a finite forward maximal endpoint. With ∣r−rc∣/s<η/s<ε/2 and ∣w∣/c<ε/2, it remains inside the prescribed phase-space ball for every τ≥0. This is Lyapunov stability by [F3].

2.2step 1.1F2F3F4F5algebra

Suppose 3s/2<rc<3s. By [F2], Wℓ′′(rc)<0; shrink η>0 so Wℓ′(r)<0 on (rc,rc+η]. For any proposed initial-state radius δ>0, choose r0∈(rc,rc+min⁡{η/2,sδ/2}) and initial data (r0,0). [F4] supplies a local solution. Its acceleration is −Wℓ′(r0)/2>0, and conservation of Hℓ gives, on the outgoing branch, w=Wℓ(r0)−Wℓ(r). The travel-time integral to rc+η is ∫r0rc+η[Wℓ(r0)−Wℓ(r)]−1/2dr, whose only endpoint singularity is bounded by a constant times (r−r0)−1/2 because Wℓ′(r0)<0. Before reaching that radius, the energy identity bounds w on the compact radial interval [r0,rc+η], so the state stays in a compact subset of (s,∞)×R near any finite maximal endpoint. The compact-continuation result [F5] therefore prevents finite-time termination before the finite travel time; the solution reaches rc+η and leaves the fixed d-ball of dimensionless radius η/s. Since d((r0,0),zc)=∣r0−rc∣/s can be made smaller than every proposed δ, this contradicts [F3].

2.3step 1.1F1F2F3F4F5algebra

At rc=3s, the circular relation gives ℓ2=3c2s2. Differentiating Wℓ(r)=c2(1−s/r)+ℓ2(r−2−sr−3) at this fixed ℓ gives Wℓ′(r)=c2s(r−3s)2/r4 and Wℓ′′(r)=−2c2s(r−3s)(r−6s)/r5. Thus Wℓ′ is positive except at 3s and Wℓ′′ changes sign there, so the equilibrium is a stationary inflection. Fix 0<η<s and, for any δ>0, choose r0∈(3s−min⁡{η/2,sδ/2},3s) with initial data (r0,0). [F4] supplies a local solution. The acceleration is negative. On the inward branch energy conservation yields w=−Wℓ(r0)−Wℓ(r) for 3s−η≤r<r0, since Wℓ is strictly increasing on that interval. The travel-time integral to 3s−η is finite; near r0 its integrand is bounded by a constant times (r0−r)−1/2 because Wℓ′(r0)>0. The energy identity bounds w while r stays in the compact interval [3s−η,r0]⊂(s,∞), so [F5] extends the solution past any finite maximal endpoint before its finite travel time. It therefore reaches 3s−η, leaving the fixed d-ball of dimensionless radius η/s. Since d((r0,0),zc)=∣r0−rc∣/s can be made smaller than every proposed δ, [F3] says the equilibrium is not Lyapunov stable.

3.1step 2.1step 2.2step 2.3A1given∎

The two subcritical cases in 2.2–2.3 are not Lyapunov stable, while the supercritical case in 2.1 is Lyapunov stable. These are deductions under the adopted Schwarzschild free-fall model [A1] and concern only its fixed-angular-momentum radial subsystem.

Remarks

  • The endpoint rc=3s is degenerate: Wℓ′′(rc)=0. The one-sided energy argument above establishes instability without calling the potential maximum or minimum.
  • The statement does not perturb ℓ and does not imply orbital stability in the full geodesic phase space.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources