Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Circular timelike geodesics, their radial-potential stability threshold, and the photon sphere at r = 3s/2

Statement

Let (M,g,N) be the Schwarzschild exterior datum with s>0 and f(r)=1−s/r (The Schwarzschild exterior model datum: domain, metric, mass parameter and time orientation), with f′=s/r2. Then:

For arbitrary x00,φ0∈R, put ω0=(cos⁡φ0,sin⁡φ0,0)∈S2. For α∈R define the rotation Rα(y1,y2,y3):=(y1cos⁡α−y2sin⁡α, y1sin⁡α+y2cos⁡α, y3), and the global axial vector field Φ(y1,y2,y3):=(−y2,y1,0) on S2; it is tangent because y⋅Φ(y)=0 for y∈S2. In every spherical-polar chart near the equator, Φ=∂φ; longitude expressions below are local chart expressions for the global sphere curve Rαω0.

In this item, a timelike circular geodesic means a future timelike geodesic whose areal radius r is constant on an interval of positive length; its angular orientation is unrestricted.

(a) Existence of circular timelike geodesics. Let r0>3s/2 and choose ℓ∈R with

ℓ2=c2sr022r0−3s>0,e:=(f(r0)(c2+ℓ2r02))1/2=c(r0−s)2r0(2r0−3s)>0.

Then the globally defined curve γ:R→M is

γ(τ):=(x00+ef(r0)τ, r0, Rℓτ/r02ω0). In each local polar chart along it, ϑ=π/2 and the longitude is φ0+ℓτ/r02 up to a constant multiple of 2π.

It is a future timelike geodesic of the datum, with g(γ′,γ′)=−c2 and with the conserved quantities e=−g(γ′,∂0) and ℓ=g(γ′,Φ) of Conserved quantities and equatorial radial reduction of timelike geodesics of the Schwarzschild exterior model; it is a circular orbit at radius r0. Its angular velocity in the coordinate x0 is

dφdx0=ℓf(r0)r02e=sgn⁡(ℓ)(s2r03)1/2,so(dφdt)2=GNm∗r03,

t=x0/c.

(b) The circular-orbit condition is necessary. Conversely, if γ:I→M is any future timelike geodesic parametrized by proper time with r(τ)≡r0>s constant on an interval of positive length, then r0>3s2. If γ is equatorial, its conserved angular momentum additionally satisfies ℓ2=c2sr022r0−3s. Consequently no timelike circular geodesic, in any angular orientation, exists with s<r0≤3s2.

(c) Stability threshold of the radial potential. For each radius r>3s2 set ℓr2:=c2sr2/(2r−3s) and regard ℓr as a constant in the function Vℓr(x):=12f(x)(c2+ℓr2/x2). Differentiate with respect to x at fixed ℓr, then evaluate at x=r. The result, evaluated at the circular value ℓr, is

Vℓr′′(r)=c2s(r−3s)r3(2r−3s),r>3s2,

so Vℓ has a strict local minimum at the circular-orbit radius exactly for r>3s, a strict local maximum exactly for 3s2<r<3s, and Vℓ′′(3s)=0; the radius r=3s is the innermost stable circular orbit radius of the restricted model in this potential sense.

(d) The photon sphere at r=3s/2. Let ℓ≠0 and put r0=3s2 and e0:=∣ℓ∣f(r0)r0=2∣ℓ∣33 s>0. Then the globally defined curve η(τ):=(x00+e0f(r0)τ, r0, Rℓτ/r02ω0),τ∈R, whose local polar expressions have ϑ=π/2 and longitude φ0+ℓτ/r02 up to chart shifts, is a future null geodesic (a null circular orbit or photon sphere orbit) with conserved quantities e0=−g(η′,∂0) and ℓ=g(η′,Φ), and its angular velocity is

dφdx0=ℓf(r0)r02e0=sgn⁡(ℓ) f(r0)r0,(dφdx0)2=f(r0)r02=427s2.

The null effective potential Wℓn(r):=f(r)ℓ2/r2 satisfies (Wℓn)′(3s/2)=0 and (Wℓn)′′(3s/2)=−32ℓ281s4<0, so the photon-sphere radius is a strict local maximum of the null potential.

(e) Scope. All statements are exact data of the restricted model: the orbits are ideal geodesics of the metric on the exterior domain, the stability claim is the sign of the second derivative of the stated potential, and no claim is made about nonlinear stability, about orbital decay, about observations or about the interior region. The case r0=s is excluded, and the reduction is stated only where r>s.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Schwarzschild exterior datum with s>0, the global rotations Rα and axial field Φ of the statement, the function f=1−s/r with f′=s/r2, and the reduction lemma of this page.

[L1]

In local spherical-polar product charts the metric components, Christoffel symbols and geodesic equations are those computed on this page; in particular the ϑ-equation is ϑ¨+2r−1r˙ϑ˙−sin⁡ϑcos⁡ϑ φ˙2=0, the φ-equation is φ¨+2r−1r˙φ˙+2cot⁡ϑ ϑ˙φ˙=0, the x0-equation is x¨0+2Γ001x˙0r˙=0, and the r-equation is r¨+ff′2(x˙0)2−f′2fr˙2−rf(ϑ˙2+sin⁡2ϑ φ˙2)=0 (Christoffel symbols of the Schwarzschild exterior metric in product charts, The Schwarzschild exterior datum is a smooth time-oriented Lorentzian four-manifold, Coordinate geodesic equation, Geodesic of an affine connection).

[L2]

For a future timelike geodesic parametrized by proper time, g(U,U)=−c2 and the constants e=−g(U,∂0)=fx˙0>0, ℓ=g(U,∂φ)=r2sin⁡2ϑ φ˙ are conserved; along an equatorial geodesic r˙2=e2−Wℓ(r) and the r-equation is equivalent to r¨=−12Wℓ′(r) (Conserved quantities and equatorial radial reduction of timelike geodesics of the Schwarzschild exterior model).

[L3]

A curve is a geodesic with affine parameter τ precisely when its components satisfy the four geodesic equations; a nonzero tangent that is future timelike (respectively null) makes the curve a future timelike (respectively null) geodesic (Geodesic of an affine connection, Coordinate geodesic equation, Timelike, null, spacelike and causal vectors of a Lorentz vector space).

[L5]

If a smooth one-parameter group acts by isometries, its infinitesimal generator is a Killing field; the pairing of a Killing field with the tangent of an affinely parametrized geodesic is constant (Killing fields of a Lorentzian metric, Killing fields and conserved currents, and on-shell conservation of the Hilbert stress-energy tensor clause (b)). The product time translations also act by isometries because the global metric is independent of x0.

[L6]

The sine and cosine functions are smooth, their derivatives are cosine and minus sine, their addition formulas hold, and sin⁡2α+cos⁡2α=1 (Sine and cosine defined by their real power series, The derivatives of sine and cosine are cosine and minus sine, The addition formulas for sine and cosine, Pythagorean and parity identities for all six trigonometric functions on their natural domains). Thus Rα is a smooth one-parameter group of orthogonal transformations of R3, its restriction preserves the induced round metric, and its derivative at α=0 is Φ.

[L7]

In any product chart (x0,r,ξ2,ξ3), the coordinate-free metric formula of The Schwarzschild exterior model datum: domain, metric, mass parameter and time orientation has components g00=−f, grr=f−1, g0r=g0i=gri=0 and gij=r2γij, with (γij) the positive-definite round-metric matrix (The Schwarzschild exterior datum is a smooth time-oriented Lorentzian four-manifold). The block inverse has grr=f and gr0=gri=0 by matrix multiplication; substituting it and gij=r2γij into the Christoffel formula of Existence and uniqueness of the metric-selected connection of a nondegenerate metric, and its extension to tensor fields gives Γr00=−12grr∂rg00=ff′/2 and Γrij=−12grr∂rgij=−rfγij, while Γr0i=0.

Proof

technique · solve the stationarity equation of the effective potential, verify the constructed circular curves against the four geodesic equations directly, and differentiate the potential twice
1.1L2L4algebra

(The stationarity equation.) By [L2] and [L4], Wℓ′(r)=f′(r)(c2+ℓ2/r2)−2f(r)ℓ2/r3=sr2(c2+ℓ2r2)−2(1−sr)ℓ2r3. Multiplying by r3/s gives rc2+ℓ2r−2ℓ2s(1−sr)=rc2+3ℓ2r−2ℓ2s, so Wℓ′(r)=0 if and only if ℓ2(2s−3r)=rc2, that is, ℓ2=c2sr22r−3s; this has a positive solution for ℓ2 precisely when r>3s/2, and the value is unique. This is the condition displayed in clauses (a) and (b).

2.1L1L2L3L4L5L6step 1.1algebra

(The timelike circular geodesic.) Let r0>3s/2, choose ℓ as in (a) and e=Wℓ(r0)>0, and define the global curve γ of clause (a). At any parameter value choose a spherical-polar chart near its angular point; the local tangent components are Ua=(e/f(r0),0,0,ℓ/r02). Then g(U,U)=−f(r0)(e/f(r0))2+r02(ℓ/r02)2=−e2f(r0)+ℓ2r02=−(c2+ℓ2r02)+ℓ2r02=−c2 by the choice of e, so U is timelike; and g(U,∂0)=−e<0, so U is future-directed. In that chart the x0-equation reduces to x¨0=0 because r˙=0; the ϑ-equation reads 0+0−sin⁡(π/2)cos⁡(π/2)(ℓ/r02)2=0; the φ-equation reduces to φ¨=0 because r˙=ϑ˙=0; and the r-equation reads ff′2(ef)2−rf(ℓr02)2=f′e22f−fℓ2r03=f′2(c2+ℓ2r02)−fℓ2r03=12Wℓ′(r0)=0, using the choice of e in the third equality and step 1.1 in the last. These equations hold in every local chart interval along the curve; longitude charts differ by constant shifts, so the global curve is a geodesic on R by [L3]. By [L5] and [L6], the global time translations and rotations are isometries, so ∂0 and Φ are Killing; their pairings with U are −e and ℓ. The Killing-pairing identity in [L5] proves these quantities are constant on the connected parameter interval. The local angular velocity is dφdx0=φ˙x˙0=ℓf(r0)r02e; squaring and substituting ℓ2 and e2=f(r0)(c2+ℓ2/r02) gives (ℓfr02e)2=ℓ2f2r04f(c2+ℓ2/r02)=ℓ2fr04c2+r02ℓ2=s2r03, using ℓ2=c2sr02/(2r0−3s); with t=x0/c this is (dφdt)2=c2s2r03=GNm∗r03. This proves (a).

2.2L2L3L7step 1.1algebra

(Necessity in any angular orientation.) Let γ:I→M be a future timelike geodesic parametrized by proper time with r≡r0 on an interval of positive length, and choose a product chart about any parameter value. Write ξ˙=(ξ˙2,ξ˙3) for the angular tangent. Since r˙=r¨=0, [L3, L7] give 0=ff′2(x˙0)2−rf γijξ˙iξ˙j, so γijξ˙iξ˙j=f′2r(x˙0)2. Timelike normalization gives −c2=−f(x˙0)2+r2γijξ˙iξ˙j=−(f−rf′/2)(x˙0)2. The value x˙0 cannot be zero, since the radial equation and positive definiteness of γ would then force ξ˙=0, contradicting timelikeness. Hence f−rf′/2=1−3s/(2r0)>0 and r0>3s/2. For an equatorial geodesic, [L2] additionally gives 0=r¨=−12Wℓ′(r0), and step 1.1 yields ℓ2=c2sr02/(2r0−3s). This proves (b) and its equatorial angular-momentum claim.

2.3L4step 1.1algebra

(The second derivative at fixed angular momentum.) Differentiate Wℓ(x)=f(x)(c2+ℓ2/x2) twice while holding ℓ constant. This gives Wℓ′′(x)=f′′(x)(c2+ℓ2/x2)−4f′(x)ℓ2/x3+6f(x)ℓ2/x4. Only after this differentiation set x=r and ℓ2=ℓr2=c2sr2/(2r−3s). Substituting f′=s/r2, f′′=−2s/r3 and simplifying gives Wℓr′′(r)=2c2s(r−3s)r3(2r−3s), hence Vℓr′′(r)=c2s(r−3s)r3(2r−3s), whose sign is that of r−3s. At r=3s, the circular value is ℓ2=3c2s2, and direct factorization gives Vℓ′(x)=c2s(x−3s)2/(2x4) for x>s. This is positive on both sides of 3s; thus Vℓ has neither a local minimum nor a local maximum there. Together with the nonzero-second-derivative test away from 3s, this proves both "exactly" assertions in (c).

3.1L1L3L4L5L6algebra

(The photon sphere.) Let ℓ≠0, r0=3s/2 and e0=∣ℓ∣f(r0)/r0>0; define the global curve η of clause (d), with local tangent components Ua=(e0/f(r0),0,0,ℓ/r02). Then g(U,U)=−e02f(r0)+ℓ2r02=−ℓ2r02+ℓ2r02=0, so U is null; and g(U,∂0)=−e0<0, so U is future-directed. The local x0-, ϑ- and φ-equations hold as in step 2.1; the r-equation reads f′e022f−r0fℓ2r04=ℓ2r02(f′2−fr0)=ℓ2r04(3s2−r0)=0 at r0=3s/2. These local equations establish a future null geodesic on the entire domain R by [L3]. By [L5] and [L6], the global Killing fields have pairings −e0 and ℓ, constant along η. Its angular velocity is ℓf(r0)r02e0=sgn⁡(ℓ)f(r0)r0, equal to +233 s for ℓ>0 and to its negative for ℓ<0, with square 4/(27s2). Finally Wℓn(r)=fℓ2/r2 has (Wℓn)′(r)=ℓ2−2r+3sr4 (that is, ℓ2(3s−2r)/r4), which vanishes at r=3s/2, and (Wℓn)′′(r)=ℓ26(r−2s)r5, which at r=3s/2 equals −32ℓ281s4<0. This proves (d).

4.1step 1.1step 2.1step 2.2step 2.3step 3.1given∎

(Conclusion.) Steps 1.1-3.1 prove clauses (a)-(d) from the metric data and the geodesic equations; clause (e) records the exact scope: the statements are about ideal geodesics of the model on r>s, with stability understood as the sign of the potential's second derivative, and no empirical or nonlinear claim is made.

Remarks

  • The innermost stable circular orbit. Clause (c) shows that the potential's second derivative changes sign at r=3s, so in this reduced one-dimensional description the circular orbits with 3s2<r<3s are maxima of the potential and those with r>3s are minima. This is a statement about the reduced potential only; the physical interpretation of the threshold as the innermost stable circular orbit of the model, and any account of how it would be observed, belong to the physics theorem and its scope remark, not to this lemma.

  • Null geodesics are not particle orbits. The photon-sphere curve of clause (d) has null tangent and no proper-time parametrization; its parameter τ is an affine parameter, and only the ratio dφ/dx0 of the tangent components is asserted, the tangent of a null geodesic being determined only up to positive scale.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources