Alphabeta Math
Physics theoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedverified 2026-10-15 (gpt-6-luna, gpt-6.1-sol, and delegated Codex review/repair agents; see completed run evidence)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Reaction equilibrium conditions at interior and boundary amounts

Physical scope

Local C1 constrained Gibbs-potential charts for a declared internal reaction network at fixed positive reservoir temperature and pressure; interior conclusions use the admitted process-record model, while boundary conclusions require the explicit boundary-inclusive entropy and auxiliary extension stated here.

Statement

Fix C≥1 species and R≥1 declared internal reaction extents. Let ν∈RC×R be the dimensionless stoichiometric matrix, let n0∈[0,∞)C have units mol, and let ξ∈RR have units mol. The amount vector is n(ξ)=n0+νξ, and the nonnegative-amount feasible extent set is

Fν:={ξ∈RR:n0+νξ∈[0,∞)C}.

Assume the exact local reaction-feasible extent set is Fν∩U; no additional local constraint removes any direction in its tangent cone. Fix T0>0 and p0>0 in a declared natural-variable chart. On an open neighborhood U of a candidate endpoint ξ∗, let Φ:U→R be a finite C1 constrained Gibbs-potential extension, in joules, satisfying

DΦ(ξ)[h]=∑j=1Cμj(ξ)(νh)j=(νTμ(ξ))⋅h,

where every μj is in J mol−1. At positive amounts, require Φ(ξ)=Uc(x(ξ))+p0Vc(x(ξ))−T0Sc(x(ξ)) for the system state x(ξ), with Uc,Vc,Sc from Equilibrium state domains and Concave macroscopic fundamental entropy; its derivative is that of the local Gibbs chart supplied by Local thermodynamic Legendre potentials and Differentials of the thermodynamic potentials.

If all amounts at ξ∗ are positive, assume ξ∗ is the system endpoint of a closed system process record and its admitted isolated-compound extension exactly as in Fixed-temperature and fixed-pressure potential minimum with internal reactions, is a global entropy-maximizing endpoint on that extension's exact feasible set, and the record's system projection contains every state x(ξ) for ξ∈Fν∩U. If at least one amount is zero, it is outside Equilibrium state domains; in that boundary case, assume instead that the model supplies a boundary-inclusive state domain with finite C1 maps Uˉc,Vˉc,Sˉc:U→R in joules, m3, and J K−1, respectively, that Φ(ξ)=Uˉc(ξ)+p0Vˉc(ξ)−T0Sˉc(ξ), and that its exact isolated-compound model has fixed total energy, an ideal reservoir with SR(ER)=SR,0+ER/T0, a constant-entropy pressure store satisfying EB−p0Vˉc(ξ)=CB, and a feasible-set projection equal to Fν∩U. Assume ξ∗ is an attained global entropy maximum on that boundary-inclusive set. This additional boundary model premise is not supplied by the positive-mole state chart or by Fixed-temperature and fixed-pressure potential minimum with internal reactions.

Under the relevant interior or boundary assumptions above, ξ∗ locally minimizes Φ on Fν∩U. Let J∗:={j:nj0+(νξ∗)j=0} be the active species set. Then the first-order necessary condition is

(νTμ(ξ∗))⋅h≥0for every h∈TFν(ξ∗),

where

TFν(ξ∗):={h∈RR:(νh)j≥0 for every j∈J∗}.

If ξ∗ is interior to Fν, this reduces to νTμ(ξ∗)=0. If, in addition, Φ is convex and differentiable on a convex neighborhood containing the relevant feasible set, the same tangent inequality is sufficient for global minimization there.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The finite species list, stoichiometric matrix, nonnegative-amount feasible set, fixed T0>0,p0>0, potential Φ and its C1 extension and gradient identity. In the interior case, ξ∗ is a positive-amount endpoint of the admitted process record used in the fixed-potential theorem. In the boundary case, use a separately declared boundary-inclusive state and auxiliary model as described in [A2]; zero-amount points are not in the positive-mole state chart.

[A1]

Boundary-chart hypothesis: Φ is finite and C1 on an open subset U⊆RR containing ξ∗, and its derivative along the affine extent map is the displayed stoichiometric chemical-potential expression throughout U. At positive amounts, the expression follows from the local Gibbs differential of [F2]; at zero amounts it is an added model extension.

[A2]

Boundary-inclusive physical model: for the boundary route only, the model declares a state domain containing the zero-amount state at ξ∗ and finite C1 maps Uˉc,Vˉc,Sˉc:U→R with units J, m3, and J K−1, and Φ=Uˉc+p0Vˉc−T0Sˉc. Its isolated compound has an exact feasible set of tuples (ξ,yR,yB) whose projection onto extents is Fν∩U, fixed total energy Uˉc(ξ)+ER(yR)+EB(yB), ideal-reservoir entropy SR(ER)=SR,0+ER/T0, constant store entropy, and pressure-store relation EB(yB)−p0Vˉc(ξ)=CB throughout that feasible set. The endpoint corresponding to ξ∗ is an attained global maximum of the sum of system, reservoir, and store entropies on this exact set. These are explicit additional model premises, not consequences of the positive-mole state domain.

[F1]

Fixed-temperature and fixed-pressure potential minimum with internal reactions: For an admitted closed process record with the specified ideal reservoir and pressure store, its system potential decreases on every record; an attained global entropy maximum on that exact isolated-compound feasible set gives a global minimum on the projected system state set. For this interior application, that projection contains the system states corresponding to every extent in Fν∩U. The supplier does not cover zero amounts outside Dc.

[F2]

Differentials of the thermodynamic potentials: On a valid single-phase energy-representation and Gibbs natural-variable chart, dG=−S dT+V dp+∑jμj dnj. The identity is used only at positive amounts; at the boundary, [A1] is the separate derivative premise.

[F3]

The feasible tangent cone for nonnegative stoichiometric amounts: For the nonnegative stoichiometric feasible polyhedron, the tangent cone consists exactly of h with (νh)j≥0 for every active species. At a differentiable local minimum, the directional derivative is nonnegative on that cone; for a differentiable convex objective on a convex domain, this condition is sufficient for a global minimum.

Proof

1.1givenF1

In the positive-amount case, [F1] gives a local minimum of Φ relative to the exact reaction-feasible states near ξ∗.

1.2givenA2algebra

In the boundary case, fixed total energy and EB−p0Vˉc=CB in [A2] give ER=C1−Uˉc(ξ)−p0Vˉc(ξ) for a constant C1. Therefore the sum of system and reservoir entropies, plus the constant store entropy, is Stot=C0+Sˉc(ξ)−(Uˉc(ξ)+p0Vˉc(ξ))/T0=C0−Φ(ξ)/T0 on the exact boundary-inclusive feasible set. Since T0>0, an attained global entropy maximum at ξ∗ is a global, hence local, minimum of Φ there.

2.1step 1.1step 1.2

Thus in either case ξ∗ is a local minimum relative to Fν∩U.

3.1givenA1F2F3step 2.1

Apply [F3] at ξ∗. It identifies the feasible tangent directions as exactly those h satisfying (νh)j≥0 for all j∈J∗. The differentiable local-minimum inequality gives DΦ(ξ∗)[h]≥0 on this cone; substituting [A1]'s gradient identity gives (νTμ(ξ∗))⋅h≥0.

4.1givenstep 3.1algebra

If ξ∗ is interior to Fν, an open neighborhood of it lies in Fν, so every direction is feasible for sufficiently small positive extent and TFν(ξ∗)=RR. For each coordinate k, let ek be the kth standard basis vector and use the two directions h=±(1 mol)ek. Step 3.1 gives ±(1 mol)(νTμ(ξ∗))k≥0, so each component vanishes and νTμ(ξ∗)=0.

5.1givenF3step 3.1∎

If Φ is convex and differentiable on a convex neighborhood containing the relevant feasible set, the sufficiency clause of [F3] makes the tangent inequality sufficient for global minimization there. Without convexity this sufficiency conclusion is not asserted.

Remarks

For the interior route, the potential minimum follows from the admitted process record and its reservoir/store model. A boundary point with a zero species amount is not in the positive-mole chart. The boundary route therefore needs the explicitly extended entropy and endpoint model in [A2]; a finite C1 extension of Φ alone would not establish physical stable equilibrium.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources