Alphabeta Math
Physics theoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedverified 2026-10-15 (gpt-6-luna, gpt-6.1-sol, and delegated Codex review/repair agents; see completed run evidence)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Unitary invariance of finite-sector quantum entropy

Physical scope

The exact closed, finite-dimensional sector model and unitary dynamics of the named NRQM supplier, including its adopted canonical preparation and stated choice assumptions; the result identifies no macroscopic entropy, open-system relaxation, or laboratory behaviour.

Statement

Adopt exactly the state, observable, autonomous-dynamics and canonical-ensemble assumptions, readings, finite-dimensional sector class, and normalized canonical preparation of Unitary evolution preserves entropy and cannot produce the canonical preparation from a different one. The sector HNσ and its self-adjoint energy operator HNσ are those of The declared fixed-N many-body model: species sector, one-particle data, interaction and the sector energy observable. Model time t is in seconds, HNσ is in joules, and ℏ=h/(2π) is the reduced Planck constant in J s, as in Dimensions, SI unit conventions and quantity types of the framework. The evolution definition Assigned energy observable, unitary flow and the two pictures of autonomous evolution gives U(t)=exp⁡(−itHNσ/ℏ) and ρ(t)=U(t)ρ(0)U(t)∗. Both the Axiom of Countable Choice and the Axiom of Choice are assumed (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω), The Axiom of Choice). Define SvN(ρ)=kBs(ρ) as in Entropy, the Boltzmann constant and the free-energy functional of the declared finite-sector model. Then, for every declared sector preparation ρ(0) and every t∈R:

  1. SvN(ρ(t))=SvN(ρ(0));
  2. the adopted canonical preparation is stationary; and
  3. a preparation different from the canonical one is never mapped to it by this unitary flow.

These are statements about the exact closed finite-sector model. They do not identify SvN with the macroscopic equilibrium entropy Sc of Macroscopic and microscopic entropy quantities, derive the canonical preparation, or establish bath relaxation or thermalization.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The complete model assumptions and conclusions (a)–(d) of the published finite-sector supplier, together with its Countable Choice and Choice assumptions; use the definition SvN=kBs and the entropy-domain distinction stated below.

[F1]

Unitary evolution preserves entropy and cannot produce the canonical preparation from a different one: under the stated finite-dimensional model and postulates, its clauses (a)–(c) prove dimensionless entropy conservation, canonical stationarity, and nonproduction of the canonical preparation from any distinct preparation.

[F2]

Entropy, the Boltzmann constant and the free-energy functional of the declared finite-sector model: in the declared finite-dimensional sector, SvN(ρ)=kBs(ρ) in J K−1.

[F3]

Macroscopic and microscopic entropy quantities: Sc is a function on the equilibrium macrostate domain Dc, whereas SvN is a function on finite-sector density operators; no identification is adopted without an additional bridge.

[F4]

The declared fixed-N many-body model: species sector, one-particle data, interaction and the sector energy observable: the declared nonzero sector has a self-adjoint energy operator HNσ assigned as its energy observable.

[F5]

Dimensions, SI unit conventions and quantity types of the framework: model time is in seconds, energy is in joules, and ℏ=h/(2π) is in J s.

[F6]

Assigned energy observable, unitary flow and the two pictures of autonomous evolution: the closed-model state evolves by ρ(t)=U(t)ρ(0)U(t)∗ with U(t)=exp⁡(−itHNσ/ℏ).

[F7]

Assigned energy observable, unitary flow and the two pictures of autonomous evolution: U is a strongly continuous unitary group with U(t)∗=U(t)−1=U(−t).

[F8]

Entropy, the Boltzmann constant and the free-energy functional of the declared finite-sector model: the supplier defines no entropy for its infinite-dimensional spatial sectors.

[A1]

The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω) and The Axiom of Choice: assume the Axiom of Countable Choice and the Axiom of Choice, exactly as the published supplier does.

Proof

1.1F1F2F4F5F6A1algebra

Under the finite-sector model [F4], units and time convention [F5], flow [F6], and both choice assumptions [A1], clause (a) of [F1] gives s(ρ(t))=s(ρ(0)) for every declared preparation and every real t. Multiplying by the fixed kB and using [F2] yields SvN(ρ(t))=SvN(ρ(0)). This proves conclusion 1.

1.2F1F4F5F6A1

Clause (b) of [F1] gives conclusion 2 under the same model and choice assumptions. The canonical preparation is an adopted premise of [F1]; its stationarity does not derive that preparation or a relaxation process.

2.1F3F7F8step 1.1step 1.2algebra∎

If ρ(t)=ρβ for some t, then applying U(t)∗ on the left and U(t) on the right, using [F7], gives ρ(0)=U(t)∗ρβU(t). Stationarity in step 1.2 at time −t makes the right-hand side ρβ. Thus ρ(0)≠ρβ implies ρ(t)≠ρβ for every real t, which is conclusion 3. By [F3] the invariant in step 1.1 is defined on density operators, while the macroscopic entropy is defined on equilibrium macrostates; [F8] also keeps the von Neumann entropy restricted to finite-dimensional sectors. None of the premises identifies those domains or supplies a bath or macroscopic relaxation law, so no monotonicity claim for Sc, bath relaxation, or thermalization follows.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources