How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Useful-work bound from the Gibbs potential
Conditional finite endpoint bound for a closed fixed-composition system in the explicitly defined ideal constant-temperature, constant-pressure reservoir model; no claim is made that a reversible protocol exists or that the bound is attained.
Statement
For a fixed-composition closed system coupled to an ideal thermal reservoir at and ideal pressure store at , let be heat into the system and let be net energy delivered by the system to an ideal work store whose entropy is constant. Assume the isolated-composite model of [A1]–[A3] in Facts & Assumptions, including its admitted compound record, feasible endpoint association and admitted additive entropy split required by Macroscopic second law for isolated compounds. Then for any admitted process between equilibrium endpoints ,
If the endpoint states lie on the natural-variable chart, this is the decrease in the Gibbs potential of Local thermodynamic Legendre potentials. Equality requires zero total entropy production; the theorem does not assert that a protocol realizing equality exists.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A system of fixed constitution , an admitted record with equilibrium endpoints , , , and the ideal reservoir/work-store model below. The core-record conditions and fixed-chart bookkeeping are those of Thermodynamic process records and transfer conventions. Write and . Use for energy delivered by the system, in joules.
Ideal thermal reservoir of constitution , with fixed volume and composition: its accessed equilibrium states have entropy on the accessed energy interval, where is its internal energy in joules and entropy is in . Heat into the system changes reservoir energy by .
Ideal pressure and work stores: the only work on the system is , where the pressure store has energy change and the work store receives . Both stores have constant entropy; no other work coordinate is admitted.
The system, bath, and both stores form a compound with an admitted record representing the same operation as . Its outer boundary is isolated throughout, its constitution is fixed, and its preparations at both endpoints are equilibrium macrostates. For both records the center-of-mass kinetic and separately tracked external-field energy changes vanish. Supply store endpoint sets , energy maps and , and constant entropy maps and , with values in . The process model supplies with and . The store-energy increments are exactly those in [A2]. Here is one declared feasible constituent endpoint set for the fixed totals, retained constraints and permitted exchanges of [F2]; one fixed total-energy value on is , including both stores from [A2]. The system and bath form an independent separated split admitted by the entropy-additivity rule required in [F2]. Every named auxiliary and work device is included in ; any device outside this two-constituent entropy split has explicitly constant endpoint entropy. Thus on gives .
First-law energy balance for closed process records: The adopted closed-record balance is , with positive into and positive on the system.
Macroscopic second law for isolated compounds: For an admitted core closed record of a compound isolated throughout, with fixed constitution and equilibrium endpoint tuples associated to the same declared feasible set, the entropy change of an admitted independent separated split is nonnegative. All named devices are included, omitted entropy contributions have declared zero change, and the kinetic and separately tracked external-field endpoint energy changes vanish.
Thermodynamic process records and transfer conventions: and are process-record transfers, not state functions; an adiabatic record has .
SI quantities and unit conventions: , , and are in joules, is in cubic metres, and .
Local thermodynamic Legendre potentials: On a valid local inverse chart, the Gibbs potential is , with the entropy coordinate.
Proof
Apply [F1] to the system record and use [A2] to obtain . By [A1] and [A3], . The compound record , its endpoint association into one , and its admitted entropy split satisfy every hypothesis of [F2] by [A3], so and . The signs of the transfers are those in [F3].
Rearranging step 1.1 gives . Since , equality implies ; no existence of an equality protocol follows. The units in [F4], the stated pressure and temperature units, and [A1]–[A2] make every energy term a value in joules. At endpoints with and on a valid Gibbs chart, [F5] equals , giving the stated Gibbs-potential interpretation.
Remarks
The result is a conditional model deduction. A finite reservoir, omitted shaft or field work, matter transfer, or an open-flow energy balance changes [A1]–[A3] and requires a separate argument.