How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Ten Dimensional NS NS Field Equations
Conditional source-free Euler–Lagrange equations of the adopted ten-dimensional tree-level two-derivative NS–NS action. No RR fields, localized or magnetic sources, higher-derivative corrections, string loops, or claim of empirical validity are included.
Statement
Let be an oriented chart with smooth string-frame Lorentzian metric of signature , smooth real dimensionless dilaton , and smooth antisymmetric potential components , . Set with indices raised by , Levi-Civita connection , and . Define Use the adopted local action
and signed form norm . In length-valued coordinates, the adopted component normalization makes dimensionless and of dimension length. A configuration is stationary for this local variational model when the first variation of that action vanishes for every independent smooth compactly supported variation of , , and , through Lorentzian metrics. Then stationarity is equivalent to The two-form equation is equivalently , where the Hodge star uses the convention fixed by the earlier supergravity conventions definition. Independently of stationarity, holds wherever the smooth potential is defined. These are conditional deductions in the adopted model.
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The smooth fields on , the action postulate, and stationarity under all independent compactly supported variations stated above.
The convention fixes the curvature, scalar wave operator, signed -form norm, , and the oriented Lorentzian Hodge star by (Supergravity Conventions And Normalizations).
Adopt the local action with no source, RR, loop, or higher-derivative terms (Ten Dimensional NS NS Supergravity Action).
For a compactly supported inverse-metric variation , the first variation of , with fixed smooth , has coefficient against ; moreover, the chart integral of a compactly supported smooth coordinate divergence is zero (Compactly Supported Metric Variation of a Weighted Scalar-Curvature Action).
The same inverse-metric variation changes the density by (Compactly Supported Metric Variation of a Weighted Scalar-Curvature Action).
If continuous coefficient components pair to zero with every smooth compactly supported test vector under a positive continuous weight, then every component vanishes pointwise (Compactly Supported Tests Determine Continuous Local Coefficients).
Every smooth compactly supported symmetric inverse-metric direction is realized by a smooth family of Lorentzian metrics for sufficiently small parameter (Compactly Supported Metric Directions Stay Lorentzian for Small Amplitude).
The convention has and , so the common action coefficient is nonzero (Supergravity Conventions And Normalizations).
Proof
Put and . For an inverse-metric variation , [F6] gives . Also and , since each inverse metric contributes the same contraction by antisymmetry. The scalar-kinetic and three-form terms in the metric variation, divided by , therefore have coefficient . The trace coefficient is , and the tensor coefficient is .
Hold fixed and vary by a compactly supported . Then and , so, after factoring out , the pre-integration-by-parts coefficient is . The vector is compactly supported. The divergence integral identity in [F2] therefore gives . Combining coefficients yields the dilaton variation .
Hold fixed and vary the antisymmetric potential by compactly supported . Smoothness and the coordinate definition of give . Antisymmetry makes the three terms equal in contraction, hence , by integration by parts for the compactly supported vector and [F2].
By [F2], the weighted curvature term has metric coefficient against . Adding the matter coefficient from step 1.1 gives the full metric coefficient, after division by .
Let be the oriented metric volume tensor. The stated Hodge convention gives . Using , define for a 3-form . Substitution of the epsilon expression and contraction in an oriented orthonormal frame, where raising the single time index changes the volume-tensor sign, gives ; equivalently the Hodge-sign exponent is even. Hence . The Hodge star is invertible, so the component equation is equivalent to .
The chain rule gives and . Substitute these into step 2.1. The terms cancel, and the metric-proportional terms combine to . Thus the symmetric metric coefficient is .
By [F4], every compactly supported symmetric inverse-metric test direction in the metric variation is realized by an admissible metric family. Stationarity therefore makes the first-variation pairings vanish for all such independent tests. Divide out the common nonzero factor by [F5]. For unordered index pairs , define test components freely and coefficient components if , and if ; then . Thus [F3] applies and gives . The dilaton coefficient is , tested as a one-component vector. For , antisymmetry gives after summing the two ordered terms, where ; hence [F3] applied to these independent pair components gives . Since , also gives .
With , the metric equation from step 4.1 reduces, after division by , to . Conversely, if this metric equation, , and the two-form equation hold, the first-variation coefficients in steps 3.1, 1.2, and 1.3 all vanish, so every compactly supported first variation is zero.
Finally : in components, antisymmetrizing the second partial derivatives of the smooth gives zero because mixed partial derivatives commute. This is an identity of the local potential, independent of stationarity and not an additional Euler–Lagrange equation.
Remarks
The action is a source-free tree-level, leading two-derivative truncation. The equations are conditional variational consequences in that model; they are not empirical proofs and do not apply across localized or magnetic sources without additional current and boundary data.