Alphabeta Math
Physics theoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Wedge modular bridge implies the Unruh clock temperature

Physical scope

An algebraic KMS statement for the vacuum state of the selected massive scalar right-wedge model, conditional on its adopted modular/boost bridge, and for one uniformly accelerated proper-time orbit. It asserts no detector response, particle production, observed temperature, Hawking effect, or density-matrix representation.

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice and the selected massive scalar wedge postulate. Use its metric η=diag⁡(−1,1,1,1), length coordinates x0=ct, right wedge WR={x1>∣x0∣}, vacuum Ω, algebra M=M(WR), modular operator ΔW, first-variable-linear pairing ⟨⋅,⋅⟩1 from the postulate, and boost ΛW(s) with dimensionless rapidity s. Define the vector state ωW(X)=⟨XΩ,Ω⟩1 for X∈M, the modular automorphisms σt(X)=ΔWitXΔW−it, and αt=σ−t for dimensionless t. The proper-time curve for any a>0 in m s−2 is γa(τ)=(c2asinh⁡aτc,c2acosh⁡aτc,0,0),τ∈R, where τ is measured in seconds. Its future-boost rapidity is s=aτ/c. For this unit proper-time parametrization, define the proper-acceleration scalar by aγ=η(γ¨a,γ¨a); the theorem verifies aγ=a. Define the proper-time action on M by α~τ=αaτ/(2πc); equivalently, it is conjugation by the future boost U(ΛW(aτ/c)).

Then for every A,B∈M there is a bounded function GA,B, continuous on the closed strip 0≤Im⁡z≤bU and holomorphic inside, whose boundaries satisfy GA,B(τ)=ωW(Aα~τ(B)),GA,B(τ+ibU)=ωW(α~τ(B)A)(τ∈R), with strip width bU=2πc/a seconds. Under the physical-time convention that the strip width is ℏβU, the associated inverse temperature and KMS temperature parameter are βU=2πcaℏ,TU=1kBβU=ℏa2πckB, where ℏ>0 is in J s and kB>0 is in J K−1. This is a conditional algebraic model deduction; it does not assert a detector response, particle production, a thermal density matrix, or an observed temperature.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice; the selected wedge model and modular/boost interface; the stated uniformly accelerated orbit; and the positive constants a,c,ℏ,kB with their SI units.

[A1]

The Axiom of Choice is assumed as defined in The Axiom of Choice.

[A2]

The selected model defines M(WR) as the double commutant of the bounded scalar Weyl observables, assumes Ω cyclic and separating for it, and adopts ΔWit=U(ΛW(−2πt)). The boost has future rapidity s under the explicit matrix convention in the postulate. Free scalar wedge data and modular-geometric bridge

[F1]

For standard modular data on a concrete von Neumann algebra, the Tomita–Takesaki theorem gives σt(X)=ΔWitXΔW−it, a normal point-ultraweakly continuous automorphism group, and an upper-strip dimensionless KMS state for αt=σ−t with width 1. It makes no norm-continuity claim for the whole von Neumann algebra. Tomita modular automorphisms and the upper-strip KMS condition

[F2]

The local rescaling lemma rescales this upper-strip W*-KMS boundary condition directly: if α~τ=ατ/λ with λ>0, the strip width becomes λ. Positive rescaling of an upper-strip W*-KMS flow

[F3]

The framework units definition uses length coordinates x0=ct, assigns c units m s−1, ℏ units J s, and kB units J K−1. In its physical-time KMS convention, a strip width b seconds corresponds to inverse temperature β=b/ℏ. Thermodynamics-GR fields, currents, reference normalization and units

Proof

Proof technique: Identify the future boost from the adopted sign convention, then rescale the modular KMS strip to the proper-time clock.

Given: [A1]–[A2], [F1]–[F3], a,c,ℏ,kB>0, and γa.

1.1A2F1algebra

By [A2], ΔWit=U(ΛW(−2πt)). Since αt=σ−t, we have αt(X)=ΔW−itXΔWit=U(ΛW(2πt))XU(ΛW(2πt))∗ for X∈M. Thus αt is the future-boost action with rapidity 2πt; the minus sign in the adopted modular identity is essential for this direction.

1.2givenF3algebra

Put ρ=c2/a and differentiate the curve in the Statement. Then γ˙a(τ)=(ccosh⁡(aτ/c),csinh⁡(aτ/c),0,0) and γ¨a(τ)=(asinh⁡(aτ/c),acosh⁡(aτ/c),0,0). Direct contraction with η gives η(γ˙a,γ˙a)=−c2 and η(γ¨a,γ¨a)=a2; also x˙0=ccosh⁡(aτ/c)>0. Therefore τ is proper time, the curve is future timelike with proper acceleration magnitude a, and its boost rapidity is aτ/c.

2.1A1A2F1F2F3step 1.1step 1.2algebra∎

Let λ=2πc/a>0, which has seconds as its unit by [F3]. Then τ/λ=aτ/(2πc) and, by step 1.1, α~τ=ατ/λ. Apply [F1] and [F2] with dimensionless width θ=1: ωW has the required bounded continuous upper-strip functions on width λ=2πc/a seconds for every A,B∈M. By [F3], βU=λ/ℏ=2πc/(aℏ) and TU=(kBβU)−1=ℏa/(2πckB). The displayed units give [βU]=J−1 and [TU]=K. No density matrix or detector statement is used.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources