Alphabeta Math
RemarkRemark: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Scope of the quaternion lift: the global sign ambiguity, closed loops, and the absence of a physical spin claim

Statement

The following qualifications are part of what the preceding items do and do not claim.

  1. Two lifts and one rotation. Let I⊆R be a nondegenerate open interval and let R:I→SO(3) be of class C1. By Existence, uniqueness and sign ambiguity of the quaternion lift of a C1 rotation path, R has exactly two C1 quaternion lifts, namely q and −q for any one lift q, both solve q′=12q φ(ωR(t)) for the same body angular velocity ωR, and ρ(q)=ρ(−q)=R. By the scaling recorded in The quaternion rotation map ρ: conjugation on the imaginary quaternions, the unit sphere S3, and quaternion lifts, ρ(λ^q)=ρ(q) for every nonzero real λ, so a rotation is represented by the antipodal pair ±q of unit quaternions and by no other data of the quaternion itself.

  2. No globally continuous sign choice. The sign of a lift is not determined by R, and the two signs cannot always be glued continuously along closed motion. The companion examples page exhibits a loop R:[0,1]→SO(3), continuous on [0,1] and C1 on (0,1), with R(0)=R(1)=I3, whose explicit lift from 1 ends at −1. By uniqueness on the interior and continuity at the endpoints, this loop admits no closed lift through 1 with that regularity; the explicit counterexample is linked in the Remarks below. In this sense the sign ambiguity is intrinsic and not an artifact of the formula ρ(q)(x)=qxq−1.

  3. No physical claim. Every statement on this page concerns curves into S3 and into the matrix group SO(3) and the differential equation q′=12q φ(ω(t)). No quantum-mechanical spin, relativistic, or half-integer-angular-momentum interpretation is asserted, no measurement is reported, and no empirical precision is claimed anywhere.

Explanations

  • What "double cover" means here. The map q↦ρ(q) from S3 onto SO(3) is two-to-one with fibres {q,−q} and is a covering homomorphism; this is the content of the published canonical item ex-su-two-to-so-three-as-a-covering-homomorphism, restated in The quaternion rotation map ρ: conjugation on the imaginary quaternions, the unit sphere S3, and quaternion lifts and linked from the page summary of this pair. Its countable-choice cost is part of that supplier's statement and is carried by every item that uses the kernel {1,−1}.

  • What is done locally. The items of this page add the differential-equation content: for a continuous body angular velocity ω the lift equation has a unique solution in S3 on the whole interval, the resulting rotation path has body angular velocity ω, and conversely the body angular velocity of any C1 rotation path is read from any lift by ω=2φ−1(q−1q′), where φ−1 is applied to the imaginary quaternion q−1q′. None of these arguments re-proves the covering statement, which is taken from the published supplier.

  • Half-angle parametrization. The factor 12 in the lift equation is the algebraic half-angle relation of the quaternion parametrization: for a rotation of angle θ about a fixed axis the lift carries the angle θ/2, as the examples on the companion page verify on explicit curves. This is an identity about the map ρ, not a statement about any physical process.

Remarks

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources