How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The bounded complex dual of C_0(X) is regular complex measures
Statement
Assume Dependent Choice. For an LCH space , every bounded complex linear functional on has a unique representation by a finite regular complex Borel measure . Conversely each such defines a bounded functional and .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Dependent Choice and a bounded complex linear functional on .
Bounded real functionals split into differences of positive functionals. (A bounded real C_0(X) functional is a difference of positive functionals)
Positive bounded functionals have finite regular representing measures. (Positive C_0(X) functionals have finite regular representing measures)
For a finite complex measure, total variation is the supremum of integrals against simple functions bounded by (Total variation is the supremum of simple integrals over unit-bounded test functions).
Under Dependent Choice, a compact subset of an open set in an LCH space has a -valued compactly supported cutoff equal to on the compact set (LCH Urysohn cutoff, The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an -indexed chain).
For a regular complex Borel measure, its total variation is finite and regular on every Borel set, so compact inner and open outer approximation apply (Regular complex Borel measures).
Proof
On the real vector space of real-valued functions put and . Apply [L1], then [L2], to the positive decompositions of both and . This gives finite regular signed measures and representing and . Put . If , complex linearity gives , whose real and imaginary parts agree exactly with those of ; hence represents .
If two finite regular complex measures and represent , then the real and imaginary signed parts of their difference integrate every real function to zero. For either signed part, move its negative Jordan component to the other side; the two resulting positive Radon measures have equal integrals on . The positive-measure uniqueness in [L2] makes those positive measures equal, so both signed parts of vanish and .
Conversely, the total-variation integral bound gives , so integration is bounded with norm at most . If , then and equality is immediate. Otherwise fix . By [L3], choose a unit-bounded simple , with disjoint Borel and , such that . By [L5], choose compact and open with and . Replace by , still an open neighbourhood of . By [L4], choose in with on . Put Then , , and on , because on only is nonzero. Outside that union, and its support lies in . Thus , and the variation bound gives . Since is arbitrary, , proving equality.
Depends on
Regular complex Borel measures
Positive C_0(X) functionals have finite regular representing measures
A bounded real C_0(X) functional is a difference of positive functionals
The total variation of a signed or complex measure is a positive measure
Integration against a signed or complex measure, and the class L^1(nu) = L^1(|nu|)
Total variation is the supremum of simple integrals over unit-bounded test functions
LCH Urysohn cutoff
The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an -indexed chain