Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-11-05 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Finite local freeness of the dual-fusion Hom sheaf

Statement

Let V be a C2-cofinite conformal vertex algebra of CFT type, let B be a nonempty open polydisk, and let F,G→B be analytic families of compact pointed worldsheets such that every component of every fiber of each family meets an incoming marked section. Give F and G respectively N and K incoming sections and the same number R≥0 of ordered outgoing sections. Assign fixed admitted generalized joint V⊗N- and V⊗K-modules W,X to the incoming sections. By a dual fusion product over B for H=F or G with incoming module Z=W or X, mean a fixed grading-restricted generalized joint V⊗R-module DH(Z) and a holomorphic family conformal block γH on Z⊗DH(Z). Holomorphic means that its evaluation on every fixed tensor is a holomorphic function on B. Require, for every b∈B and every admitted V⊗R-module M, that T↦γH,b∘(idZ⊗T) be the representing bijection Hom⁡V⊗R(M,DH(Z))→CBHb(Z⊗M). Suppose these two family products are supplied; their existence and a choice of holomorphic trivialization of arbitrary varying fiber modules are not conclusions of this theorem. Then the constant sheaf

H:=Hom⁡V⊗R ⁣(DG(X)′,DF(W))⊗COB

is finite locally free over B. Here DG(X)′ is the contragredient of DG(X); “finite locally free” means locally isomorphic to OBn for one finite integer n on each neighborhood.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

Finite generation of C2-cofinite generalized joint modules supplies a finite set E⊂C, depending only on V, for which G(A)=⨁λ∈ERA[λ] is a finite-dimensional generating subspace of every admitted generalized joint module A.

[F2]

VOA conformal block and dual fusion product requires each assumed dual fusion product to be a grading-restricted generalized module; existence is a hypothesis here. Contragredient construction preserves generalized VOA modules makes the restricted contragredient another module in this same joint class.

[F3]

A component module map intertwines every mode, and therefore each Li(0). Hence it preserves joint generalized weights: (Li(0)−λi)nf(a)=f((Li(0)−λi)na) for every integer n≥0.

Proof

Given: The C2-cofinite algebra, families, nonempty base, and indicated dual fusion products in the Statement.

1.1givenF1F2algebra

Put A=DG(X)′ and C=DF(W). By [F2] these are grading-restricted generalized V⊗R-modules. By [F1], G(A)=⨁λ∈ERA[λ] is finite dimensional and generates A under the component modes. Also CE=⨁λ∈ERC[λ] is finite dimensional, since it is a finite sum of finite-dimensional joint generalized-weight spaces. If R=0, the empty-tuple joint-space convention makes both modules finite dimensional and the same assertions hold with G(A)=A and CE=C.

2.1F3step 1.1algebra

By [F3], restriction sends Hom⁡V⊗R(A,C) into Hom⁡C(G(A),CE). This restriction map is injective: a module map zero on G(A) is zero on every finite string of component modes applied to those generators, and such strings span A. The target is a finite-dimensional vector space, so the indicated module Hom space has some finite dimension d. No auxiliary grading-preservation condition is imposed on these maps.

3.1step 2.1choose∎

Choose a basis of this d-dimensional Hom space. Tensoring its basis isomorphism with OB gives an OB-linear isomorphism H≅OBd, proving finite local freeness of exactly the constant tensor-product sheaf in the Statement. This uses neither an identification with a varying conformal-block sheaf nor a base-change assertion about such a sheaf.

Remarks

This proof is conditional only on the existence and module-class interfaces expressly assumed for the displayed dual fusion products. It does not construct those products or prove the dual-fusion representing theorem. Identifying this constant Hom sheaf with a family conformal-block sheaf and proving compatibility with holomorphic base change remain separate obligations in consumers that require them.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources