Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Total momentum and total angular momentum balances for a finite system with antisymmetric pair forces; pairwise central forces make the internal torque vanish

Statement

Let I⊆R be an interval with at least two points (Intervals of R: the nine order-convex forms, nondegeneracy, and length), let N≥1, let m1,…,mN>0, and let xi:I→R3 be twice differentiable, i.e. differentiable with derivative xi′ differentiable (The derivative and the Riemann integral of a vector-valued function: an intrinsic derivative and a componentwise integral). Write pi:=mixi′ and suppose there are maps fi:I→R3 and, for every ordered pair i≠j in {1,…,N}, maps fij:I→R3 such that

fij(t)=−fji(t),pi′(t)=fi(t)+∑j≠ifij(t)(t∈I).

Write P:=∑ipi, J:=∑ixi×pi (cross product in R3, The cross product in R3). Then:

  1. P is differentiable on I with P′(t)=∑ifi(t) for all t∈I;
  2. J is differentiable on I with J′(t)=∑ixi(t)×fi(t)+∑i<j(xi(t)−xj(t))×fij(t)(t∈I);
  3. if in addition, for every i<j, fij is parallel to xi−xj — that is, there is a real function λij on I with fij=λij(xi−xj) — then J′(t)=∑ixi(t)×fi(t) for all t∈I.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An interval I⊆R with at least two points, N≥1, positive reals m1,…,mN, twice differentiable curves xi:I→R3, velocities vi:=xi′, momenta pi=mivi, and maps fi,fij with fij=−fji and pi′=fi+∑j≠ifij on I.

[L1]

Sums and scalar multiples of curves differentiable at t are differentiable at t with the expected derivatives (The derivative and the Riemann integral of a vector-valued function: an intrinsic derivative and a componentwise integral).

[L2]

Finite sums over finite sets may be reindexed along bijections and are additive over disjoint unions (Finite commutative-monoid sums are invariant under bijective reindexing, split over disjoint unions, and satisfy the finite Fubini rule clauses 1 and 2); consequently, for vectors aij indexed by the ordered pairs (i,j) with i≠j, the set of such pairs is the disjoint union over the unordered pairs i<j of the two-element sets {(i,j),(j,i)}, so ∑i∑j≠iaij=∑i<j(aij+aji). Scalar factors distribute over finite sums (Laws of finite sums and finite products).

[L3]

For differentiable curves u,v:I→R3 and t∈I, the cross product t↦u(t)×v(t) is differentiable at t with derivative u′(t)×v(t)+u(t)×v′(t) (Differentiation of sums, scalar multiples, inner products, cross products and squared norms of differentiable curves in R3).

[L4]

The cross product is bilinear and alternating, so u×u=0, u×v=−(v×u) and u×(v+w)=u×v+u×w for u,v,w∈R3 (The cross product in R3, The cross product is bilinear, alternating, and orthogonal to both factors).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1givenL1L2algebra

Since P is the finite sum of the differentiable curves pi, [L1] gives P′=∑ipi′; substituting the balance equation and using fij=−fji with the reindexing rule [L2], ∑i∑j≠ifij=∑i<j(fij+fji)=0, so P′=∑ifi; this is clause 1.

2.1step 1.1givenL1L3

Each term xi×pi is differentiable on I with derivative xi′×pi+xi×pi′ by [L3], and [L1] makes their finite sum J differentiable with J′=∑ixi′×pi+∑ixi×pi′=∑ixi′×pi+∑ixi×fi+∑i∑j≠ixi×fij.

3.1step 2.1L4algebra

The first sum in step 2.1 vanishes termwise: xi′×pi=mixi′×xi′=0 by alternation [L4].

4.1step 2.1step 3.1L2L4algebra

The double sum in step 2.1 equals ∑i<j(xi×fij+xj×fji)=∑i<j(xi−xj)×fij: the first equality reindexes the ordered pairs by the unordered ones [L2], and the second uses fji=−fij, bilinearity and u×(−w)=−(u×w) [L4]. Combining with steps 2.1 and 3.1 gives clause 2.

5.1step 4.1givenL4algebra∎

Under the parallelism hypothesis, (xi−xj)×fij=λij(xi−xj)×(xi−xj)=0 for every i<j by alternation [L4]; hence the double sum in clause 2 vanishes and J′=∑ixi×fi, which is clause 3.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources