How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The critical Sobolev embedding into every finite
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let and let be nonempty, open, bounded and a -extension domain for every (the extension operator may depend on ). For every there is with that is, continuously for every finite . The constant necessarily blows up as , so no bound is asserted.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Axiom of Choice; ; a bounded nonempty open set that is a -extension domain for every , with the operator allowed to depend on (Sobolev extension domains and extension operators); ; and a class .
Holder's inequality on the finite measure set : for , (Holder's inequality for integrals, including the endpoint cases).
Subcritical Sobolev embedding: for and , on a bounded extension domain (Sobolev embedding on bounded extension domains for ).
consists of the classes with all first weak derivatives in , and the Sobolev norm is the norm of the component norms (Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms, The space as the quotient by null functions, The Sobolev conjugate exponent and the scaling identity).
If , there is equal to on (A Euclidean bump for a compact set inside an open set). Polar coordinates give the radial integral formula (Polar coordinates decompose Lebesgue measure into r^{n-1} dr d sigma, The polar surface set function on the unit sphere), and weak derivatives are defined by integration by parts against compactly supported smooth tests (Weak derivative of a locally integrable function).
Proof
The case . By [F1] with and , .
The case . Put . Then and by [F3]. By the domain hypothesis, is a -extension domain, so the subcritical embedding [F2] with and gives . Holder [F1] applied to each component with gives for ; summing over the finitely many multi-indices yields . Combining the two estimates proves the case ; since , the resulting constant depends only on .
Conclusion. Steps 1.1 and 1.2 cover and , so every finite is covered with a constant depending only on . To see that these constants cannot remain bounded as , choose and with , and choose as in [F4]. Define for , assigning any finite value at . If , then Thus polar coordinates [F4] give for ; also near because and the polar integral of converges for , and on the rest of its compact support is smooth with bounded derivatives. For every coordinate line with nonzero transverse displacement from , is smooth and compactly supported on that line. Apply the fundamental theorem (If is differentiable with integrable then ; and a bounded derivative makes Lipschitz) to times a test function. The transverse singleton of excluded lines is null since , and on their bounded support. Fubini (Tonelli and Fubini for the completed product, with only almost-everywhere section measurability) therefore integrates the section identities to the weak derivative identity, proving . It is essentially unbounded on every neighbourhood of : for every it exceeds on a punctured ball about , so has positive measure. If and admissible constants satisfied , then for each , the set has positive measure and Letting gives for every , a contradiction. Hence the best constants necessarily diverge as , and no endpoint is asserted.
Source notes
Kinnunen's Remark 3.16 and Hunter's discussion at record the critical embedding for finite and the failure of the endpoint. The proof above reduces to the subcritical embedding with source exponent and uses Holder on the finite measure domain to compare with . The all-exponents hypothesis supplies exactly this extension operator for each finite ; the case is direct Holder.
Depends on
The Axiom of Choice
The Sobolev conjugate exponent and the scaling identity
Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms
The space as the quotient by null functions
Sobolev extension domains and extension operators
Sobolev embedding on bounded extension domains for
Holder's inequality for integrals, including the endpoint cases
A Euclidean bump for a compact set inside an open set
Polar coordinates decompose Lebesgue measure into r^{n-1} dr d sigma
The polar surface set function on the unit sphere
Weak derivative of a locally integrable function
Tonelli and Fubini for the completed product, with only almost-everywhere section measurability
If is differentiable with integrable then ; and a bounded derivative makes Lipschitz