Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Liouville probability transport and constant fine entropy

Statement

Let (M,ω,H,Φ,m0) be a Hamiltonian phase datum and let R⊆M be an open complete invariant domain. For any finite-valued Borel density ρ0≥0 with ρ0∈L1(m0∣R) and ∫Rρ0 dm0=1, define ρt=ρ0∘Φ−t. Then ρt is a probability density for every t, and for every bounded Borel observable A, ∫RAρt dm0=∫R(A∘Φt)ρ0 dm0. If ρ0 is smooth, it satisfies the classical Liouville equation ∂tρt+XHρt=0. For merely L1 data, it satisfies the distributional equation on R, meaning ∫R∫Rρt(∂tφ+XHφ) dm0 dt=0 for every smooth compactly supported test function φ∈Cc∞(R×R).

If additionally ∫R∣ρ0log⁡ρ0∣ dm0<∞, with 0log⁡0=0, then the reference-measure fine entropy Sk(t)=−k∫Rρtlog⁡ρt dm0,k>0, is finite and constant. This is not a monotonicity claim for entropy after coarse graining.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An open complete invariant flow domain, a normalized m0-density, and, for the entropy clause, absolute integrability of ρ0log⁡ρ0.

[A1]

Adopt countable choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)) for the phase measure and the completed-product integration in [F4]. The canonical application [F7] uses only the energy-weighted clause of its supplier; the separate regular-shell clause and its full-AC hypothesis are not used.

[F1]

Hamiltonian phase, complete-domain flow and reference measure: Φt is the actual flow and m0 is the measure induced by the positive symplectic density.

[F2]

Liouville volume preservation and A volume-preserving diffeomorphism preserves its induced Borel measure: the flow on the open complete invariant manifold R preserves its restricted positive density, hence the induced measure m0∣R.

[F3]

Integral invariance under measure-preserving maps: for an m0-preserving map, composition preserves nonnegative and integrable Lebesgue integrals.

[F4]

Tonelli and Fubini for the completed product, with only almost-everywhere section measurability: the time and phase-space integral of the compactly supported weak-test integrand may be interchanged under its stated countable-choice assumption.

[F5]

Integrable real and complex functions, and their integrals: the displayed L1 assumptions mean absolute integrability with respect to m0∣R.

[F6]

The chain rule for total derivatives: D(g∘f)(a)=Dg(f(a))∘Df(a): differentiating a smooth observable along a differentiable flow curve gives its derivative by applying the vector field.

[F7]

Invariant energy-weighted and regular-shell probabilities: when Zβ∈(0,∞), the canonical density is one of the invariant energy-weighted probabilities.

Proof

Given: [A1] and [F1]–[F7].

1.1A1F1F2F3F6given

By [F2], Φt preserves m0∣R. Applying [F3] to ρ0 gives ∫Rρt dm0=∫Rρ0 dm0=1. Applying [F3] to the nonnegative and negative parts of the bounded observable times the probability density gives ∫RAρt dm0=∫R(A∘Φt)ρ0 dm0. All these integrals are finite because A is bounded and ρ0∈L1.

1.2A1F2F4F5given

For L1 data and a test function φ as in the statement, use the measure-preserving change z=Φt(w) from [F2]. The integrand becomes ρ0(w)ddtφ(t,Φtw). Its time support is compact; the union of the inverse images of the compact spatial support over that compact time interval is compact by continuity of the complete flow. The derivative of φ is bounded there, so ρ0 times a constant times the indicator of this compact set is integrable by [F5]. [F4] permits Fubini, and the inner time integral is the integral of a total derivative with zero endpoint values. It is therefore zero, proving the distributional identity.

2.1F1F6step 1.1algebra

If ρ0 is smooth, differentiate ρt(z)=ρ0(Φ−tz) by [F6] and the flow composition law. The derivative of Φ−t along the flow is −XH, yielding ∂tρt+XHρt=0.

3.1A1F3F5F7step 1.1∎

Pointwise, ρtlog⁡ρt=(ρ0log⁡ρ0)∘Φ−t, including zeros under the convention 0log⁡0=0. By [F3], the integral of this integrable function is independent of t. Its absolute integrability and the L1-integrability of ρ0 make Sk(t) finite, and the displayed identity makes it constant. In particular, when the finite canonical density of [F7] is used, it is stationary.

Remarks

The mathematical entropy here is defined relative to the specified dimensionless reference measure; choosing k=kB gives entropy units J/K in a physical interpretation. Hamiltonian volume preservation does not prove entropy increase, coarse-grained monotonicity, or equilibration.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources