Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-10-23 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Global smooth periodic linear acoustics

Statement

Assume Countable Choice. Let d∈{1,2,3}, ρ∗>0, c∗>0, and let z0:Td→R and v0:Td→Rd be smooth periodic data on the normalized torus Td=(R/2πZ)d. Use normalized measure dμ=(2π)−ddx, coefficients f^(k)=∫f(x)e−ik⋅x dμ(x), weights wk=(1+∣k∣2)1/2, and componentwise norms ∥f∥Hm2=∑k∈Zdwk2m∣f^(k)∣2. To define the tangent system, let P:(0,∞)→R be any C2 function with P′(ρ∗)=c∗2 (for example, P(ρ)=c∗2ρ). The base nonlinear equations are ρt+div⁡(ρu)=0 and ut+u⋅∇u+ρ−1∇P(ρ)=0, for smooth positive scalar ρ and vector u on spacetime. The equilibrium is (ρ,u)=(ρ∗,0). By its tangent system we mean that the derivative at ϵ=0 of each equation residual evaluated at (ρ,u)=(ρ∗+ϵz,ϵv) vanishes; the perturbation fields are arbitrary smooth maps, and ϵ is restricted near zero on each compact time interval so that density stays positive. The resulting constant-coefficient tangent system zt+ρ∗div⁡v=0,vt+(c∗2/ρ∗)∇z=0,(z,v)∣t=0=(z0,v0) has a unique real C∞ solution (z,v) on R×Td. For every integer m≥0, the weighted energy ∥v(t)∥Hm2+(c∗2/ρ∗2)∥z(t)∥Hm2 is constant for all t∈R. This is the exact linear tangent model; it does not assert equality with a finite-amplitude nonlinear fluid evolution.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice, the constants and smooth periodic data in the Statement. The result concerns only the displayed linear system.

[F1]

Periodic fluid Fourier Sobolev spaces fixes the normalized Fourier coefficients, the positive weights wk=(1+∣k∣2)1/2, and the real weighted coefficient completion defining Hm. The rapid decay of smooth initial-data coefficients used below is proved locally in step 3.1, rather than supplied by this definition.

[F2]

Fourier synthesis and Parseval hold on the normalized 2π-periodic torus after the unit-torus change of variables (The Fourier basis and Parseval's identity on the finite torus).

[F3]

For σ>d/2, Hσ embeds in L∞, and for σ>j+d/2, Hσ embeds in Cj (Periodic Fourier embeddings and products).

[L1]

The current fd-s01 manifest contains carriers for the Fourier-space definition and embedding/product lemma used here. I inspected their current statements and full proofs and matched these uses; both current step1Decision queries return ready with current hashes. These records document authoring readiness, not independent proof acceptance.

[A1]

Countable Choice is inherited from the Fourier-basis result used for coefficient synthesis; the proof spends no additional choice principle (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

Proof

technique · Solve the independent Fourier-mode linear systems, conserve their positive mode energy, and synthesize the smooth solution
1.1givenalgebra

The mass residual at (ρ∗+ϵz,ϵv) is ϵ(zt+ρ∗div⁡v)+ϵ2div⁡(zv). The velocity residual is ϵvt+ϵ2v⋅∇v+ϵ[P′(ρ∗+ϵz)/(ρ∗+ϵz)]∇z. Differentiating at zero gives exactly the two displayed linear equations because P′(ρ∗)=c∗2. Thus the tangent interpretation follows from the defined residual derivative, without assuming that perturbations solve the nonlinear system for nonzero ϵ.

1.2givenF1algebra

Write Fourier coefficients with kernel e−ik⋅x. For each k∈Zd, the PDE is the finite-dimensional ODE z^˙=−iρ∗k⋅v^, v^˙=−i(c∗2/ρ∗)kz^. For k≠0, differentiating the first equation and substituting the second gives z^¨+c∗2∣k∣2z^=0. With ωk=c∗∣k∣, its unique solution is z^(t,k)=z^0(k)cos⁡(ωkt)−iρ∗(k⋅v^0(k))sin⁡(ωkt)/ωk, and integrating the second mode equation gives v^(t,k)=v^0(k)−i(c∗2/ρ∗)k∫0tz^(s,k) ds. At k=0 both coefficients are constant.

2.1step 1.2algebra

Differentiation of these formulas recovers both mode equations and their initial coefficients. For each k, differentiating Ek=∣v^∣2+(c∗2/ρ∗2)∣z^∣2 gives zero: the two cross terms are −i(c∗2/ρ∗)[(kz^)⋅v^‾+(k⋅v^)z^‾], whose bracket is real, so its real part vanishes. Thus Ek(t)=Ek(0) for every mode. The mode formulas also preserve conjugate symmetry because their coefficients at −k are conjugates of those at k.

3.1givenstep 2.1F1F2algebra

For each scalar component f of the smooth initial data and every integer N≥0, periodic integration by parts gives (1+∣k∣2)Nf^(k)=(1−Δ)Nf^(k), where Δ=∑j=1d∂xj2; opposite periodic-face terms cancel. Since (1−Δ)Nf is continuous on the compact torus, its L1 norm Cf,N is finite, and ∣f^(k)∣≤Cf,N(1+∣k∣2)−N. For any integer m≥0, choose N with 4N−2m>d. The shell j≤∣k∣<j+1 contains at most Cd(j+1)d−1 lattice points, by placing disjoint unit cubes at its lattice points inside a shell of fixed enlarged width, so ∑k(1+∣k∣2)m−2N<∞ by comparison with ∑j≥1jd−1+2m−4N. Thus every initial component belongs to every Hm under [F1]. Multiplying the mode identity Ek(t)=Ek(0) from step 2.1 by (1+∣k∣2)m and summing these nonnegative finite-energy series proves, by [F2], the stated conserved weighted energy. In particular both coefficient families remain in every Hm, uniformly for all real time.

4.1step 3.1F2F3A1

Fourier synthesis [F2], under the stated Countable Choice assumption [A1], now defines real fields z(t),v(t). The uniform Hm bounds and embeddings [F3] imply convergence of the Fourier series with every spatial derivative, locally uniformly in time. The mode equations pass through these convergent series and give the PDE. Write q=(z,v) and let L be the constant-coefficient first-order spatial operator in that system; recursively ∂tnq=Lnq, which is a finite sum of spatial derivatives of order at most n. Thus all mixed derivatives are continuous, so q∈C∞(R×Td).

5.1step 1.2step 3.1step 4.1F2∎

For any two smooth solutions with the same data, each Fourier-mode difference solves the same linear ODE with zero initial value. Uniqueness of the finite-dimensional linear ODE gives zero difference at each k, and Fourier synthesis then gives equality of the fields. Together with the energy conservation and smooth synthesis above, this proves the global existence, conservation, and uniqueness assertions.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources