How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Global smooth periodic linear acoustics
Statement
Assume Countable Choice. Let , , , and let and be smooth periodic data on the normalized torus . Use normalized measure , coefficients , weights , and componentwise norms . To define the tangent system, let be any function with (for example, ). The base nonlinear equations are and , for smooth positive scalar and vector on spacetime. The equilibrium is . By its tangent system we mean that the derivative at of each equation residual evaluated at vanishes; the perturbation fields are arbitrary smooth maps, and is restricted near zero on each compact time interval so that density stays positive. The resulting constant-coefficient tangent system has a unique real solution on . For every integer , the weighted energy is constant for all . This is the exact linear tangent model; it does not assert equality with a finite-amplitude nonlinear fluid evolution.
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Countable Choice, the constants and smooth periodic data in the Statement. The result concerns only the displayed linear system.
Periodic fluid Fourier Sobolev spaces fixes the normalized Fourier coefficients, the positive weights , and the real weighted coefficient completion defining . The rapid decay of smooth initial-data coefficients used below is proved locally in step 3.1, rather than supplied by this definition.
Fourier synthesis and Parseval hold on the normalized -periodic torus after the unit-torus change of variables (The Fourier basis and Parseval's identity on the finite torus).
For , embeds in , and for , embeds in (Periodic Fourier embeddings and products).
The current fd-s01 manifest contains carriers for the Fourier-space definition and embedding/product lemma used here. I inspected their current statements and full proofs and matched these uses; both current step1Decision queries return ready with current hashes. These records document authoring readiness, not independent proof acceptance.
Countable Choice is inherited from the Fourier-basis result used for coefficient synthesis; the proof spends no additional choice principle (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()).
Proof
The mass residual at is . The velocity residual is . Differentiating at zero gives exactly the two displayed linear equations because . Thus the tangent interpretation follows from the defined residual derivative, without assuming that perturbations solve the nonlinear system for nonzero .
Write Fourier coefficients with kernel . For each , the PDE is the finite-dimensional ODE , . For , differentiating the first equation and substituting the second gives . With , its unique solution is , and integrating the second mode equation gives . At both coefficients are constant.
Differentiation of these formulas recovers both mode equations and their initial coefficients. For each , differentiating gives zero: the two cross terms are , whose bracket is real, so its real part vanishes. Thus for every mode. The mode formulas also preserve conjugate symmetry because their coefficients at are conjugates of those at .
For each scalar component of the smooth initial data and every integer , periodic integration by parts gives , where ; opposite periodic-face terms cancel. Since is continuous on the compact torus, its norm is finite, and . For any integer , choose with . The shell contains at most lattice points, by placing disjoint unit cubes at its lattice points inside a shell of fixed enlarged width, so by comparison with . Thus every initial component belongs to every under [F1]. Multiplying the mode identity from step 2.1 by and summing these nonnegative finite-energy series proves, by [F2], the stated conserved weighted energy. In particular both coefficient families remain in every , uniformly for all real time.
Fourier synthesis [F2], under the stated Countable Choice assumption [A1], now defines real fields . The uniform bounds and embeddings [F3] imply convergence of the Fourier series with every spatial derivative, locally uniformly in time. The mode equations pass through these convergent series and give the PDE. Write and let be the constant-coefficient first-order spatial operator in that system; recursively , which is a finite sum of spatial derivatives of order at most . Thus all mixed derivatives are continuous, so .
For any two smooth solutions with the same data, each Fourier-mode difference solves the same linear ODE with zero initial value. Uniqueness of the finite-dimensional linear ODE gives zero difference at each , and Fourier synthesis then gives equality of the fields. Together with the energy conservation and smooth synthesis above, this proves the global existence, conservation, and uniqueness assertions.