Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pendingverified 2026-10-23 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Global periodic weak viscous existence

Statement

Assume Countable Choice. Let d≥2, L>0, ν>0, and u0∈H for the periodic solenoidal Fourier spaces defined above. Then there exists a global unforced periodic Leray–Hopf solution with data (ν,u0) under the definition above. This is an existence assertion; it asserts no uniqueness or global smoothness.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice, d≥2, L>0, ν>0, and u0∈H; all spaces, Fourier multipliers, and periodic conventions are those stated by Periodic solenoidal Fourier spaces.

[F1]

Periodic solenoidal Fourier spaces: under Countable Choice, P and rectangular Fourier truncations are orthogonal contractions on H, Fourier coefficients satisfy Parseval, and V=H∩H1.

[F2]

Unforced periodic Leray–Hopf solution: a solution must satisfy the divergence-free weak identity, the initial energy inequality for every time, and the full-measure restart inequality.

[F3]

Fourier compactness with coefficient time control: uniform Lt∞H and Lt2V bounds plus fixed-mode Lipschitz estimates give a subsequence converging in CwH coefficientwise, strongly in Lt2H, with strong H convergence at almost every time.

[F4]

Quadratic transport in negative Sobolev space: the nonlinear Fourier coefficients are well-defined and bounded by the square of the H norm; in particular every fixed-mode nonlinear coefficient is uniformly bounded on energy-bounded trajectories.

[F5]

The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω): countable diagonal subsequences and the diagonal choice across integer time horizons are permitted.

[F6]

Picard-Lindelöf local existence and uniqueness for first-order systems: a continuous vector field on an open subset of R×Rm that is locally Lipschitz in the state has a unique local solution through every initial point, and any two such solutions agree on each common interval containing that initial time. In particular, on a closed cylinder with state radius r and time radius h, a bound ∥F∥≤B, a state-Lipschitz constant LF, hB≤r, and hLF<1 give the stated local solution.

Proof

1.1givenF1F6algebra

For N≥1, let XN=ran⁡ΠN∩H and solve in this finite-dimensional real space ∂tuN+ΠNPdiv⁡(uN⊗uN)=νΔuN,uN(0)=ΠNu0. Choose real orthonormal coordinates on XN, whose finite Fourier coefficients satisfy the real conjugation and solenoidal conditions. The right side preserves this real space and is a polynomial vector field FN:Rm→Rm. It is continuous on the open time-state domain R×Rm; its derivative is bounded on each closed coefficient ball, so integration along line segments gives a Lipschitz bound there. Thus [F6] gives a unique local solution through the projected initial value. Pairing with uN removes P,ΠN by orthogonality, and periodic integration by parts gives ∫(uN⋅∇)uN⋅uN=∫div⁡(uN∣uN∣2/2)=0. Thus ∥uN(t)∥22+2ν∫st∥∇uN∥22dτ=∥uN(s)∥22 on every local existence interval.

2.1givenF6step 1.1

By the overlap uniqueness in [F6], all local solutions through the initial data glue on their interval union to one maximal solution. The energy identity bounds its coordinates in the fixed finite-dimensional real space XN for all nonnegative times of existence. The polynomial vector field is bounded on that closed coefficient ball, so the coordinate curve is uniformly Lipschitz in time. If its positive endpoint β were finite, completeness of Rm would give a limit a∗ as t↑β. Apply [F6] at (β,a∗) and join the resulting local solution to the old curve. The derivatives match because both approach FN(a∗), so this is a C1 solution extending the maximal interval, a contradiction. Therefore every uN is forward global and the energy identity holds for all 0≤s≤t.

2.2givenF1F3F4F5step 1.1

For fixed k, the nonlinear coefficient is bounded by C∣κk∣∥uN∥22 and the viscous coefficient by ν∣κk∣2∥uN∥2. The energy identity supplies uniform L∞H and L2V bounds. The fixed-mode derivative bound is therefore uniform in N; [F3] gives subsequential compactness on each finite horizon, including strong convergence in L2(0,m;H). Applying [F5] diagonally over integer horizons yields one subsequence that retains uniform coefficient convergence and converges strongly in L2(0,m;H) for every integer m. The limits on overlapping horizons agree because their Fourier coefficient curves are the same; hence they define one global limit u∈Cw([0,∞);H)∩Lloc2V with the stated energy bounds.

3.1givenF1F2F3step 2.2

For a finite Fourier divergence-free test, uniform coefficient convergence passes the time-linear terms, strong Lt2H convergence passes the quadratic term by [F3], and the viscous term passes after integration by parts as +ν(uN,Δϕ), using strong Lt2H convergence. A smooth periodic test and its time derivative have uniformly convergent Fourier truncations on their compact time support, by repeated integration by parts in space; the uniform energy bound controls the truncation errors. Thus the weak identity in [F2] holds for every admissible test, including its initial term because ΠNu0→u0 in H.

3.2givenF2F3F5step 1.1step 2.2

For each fixed t, finite coefficient convergence gives ∥u(t)∥22≤lim inf⁡N∥uN(t)∥22. For the gradient integral on [s,t], each finite Fourier sum is the limit of the corresponding Galerkin sum and is bounded above by the full Galerkin integral; increasing the finite sets gives the lower-semicontinuous bound for ∫st∥∇u∥22. At s=0, use ΠNu0→u0 in the Galerkin equality to obtain the initial energy inequality for every t. By step 2.2, the selected sequence converges strongly in L2(0,m;H) to u for every positive integer m. Countable Choice therefore selects one increasing subsubsequence (Nj) such that ∥uNj−u∥L2(0,j;H)2≤2−j for each j. For each integer m, Tonelli [F3] gives ∑j≥m∥uNj(s)−u(s)∥H2<∞ for almost every s∈(0,m); intersecting these full-measure sets over m gives one full-measure S⊂(0,∞) with strong H convergence at every s∈S. For each such s, passing the Galerkin equality at s and any fixed t≥s gives the restart inequality; since the lower-semicontinuity bounds hold for every fixed t, this establishes the inequality for all t≥s.

4.1givenF2F5F6step 2.2step 3.2∎

The coefficient convergence implies u(t)⇀u0 in H as t↓0. The initial energy inequality gives lim sup⁡t↓0∥u(t)∥2≤∥u0∥2; weak convergence and the Hilbert identity for ∥u(t)−u0∥22 then imply strong convergence to u0. Together the compactness, weak-limit, and energy arguments verify every clause of the Leray–Hopf definition; the finite-dimensional local existence and continuation used above are supplied by [F6].

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources