How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
If on an interval for some rational then is constant
Statement
Let be order-convex (Intervals of : the nine order-convex forms, nondegeneracy, and length), let , let with , and let with (Order on the rationals). Suppose
the power being the rational power of a nonnegative base (Rational powers of a positive base, with the convention for ). Then is constant on : for all .
The hypothesis is written out, and not expressed through Lipschitz map, -Hölder map for rational , and contraction, because it cannot be. That definition introduces the -Hölder condition for rational with only, and says explicitly that no claim is made about an exponent above . The displayed inequality is the natural extension of the formula to , and this theorem is what that extension is worth: for rational the same inequality is the -Hölder condition of Lipschitz map, -Hölder map for rational , and contraction instantiated at by Dictionary: for with the metric , continuity and uniform continuity of agree with the metric-space notions, the Lipschitz and Hölder conditions are the metric ones instantiated, and a subset of is compact in the open-cover sense of exactly when it is a compact metric subspace, clause 4, and then it makes uniformly continuous, hence continuous (Contraction implies Lipschitz implies uniformly continuous implies continuous; every Hölder map is uniformly continuous, and a Lipschitz map on a bounded space is Hölder for every exponent, Continuity of at a point of and on : the - condition, its agreement with at a limit point, and continuity at an isolated point); above it makes constant, which is why the definition stops at .
Order-convexity is essential. On a domain that is not order-convex the conclusion fails: on the function , satisfies the inequality with and any , and is not constant. What the proof uses is that the whole segment between two points of lies in , so that the distance between them can be subdivided.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An order-convex , a function , a real and a rational with for all . Natural numbers are identified with their canonical images in , as elsewhere in this library.
Order-convexity: with gives (Intervals of : the nine order-convex forms, nondegeneracy, and length).
Rational powers of a positive base: is defined for and , with and agreeing with the integer power; and for rational (Rational powers of a positive base, Existence and uniqueness of -th roots: a unique with , Integer powers ).
Laws of rational exponents for and : ; ; ; ; (Laws of rational exponents).
Monotonicity of rational powers: for and rationals one has ; and for rational and one has (Monotonicity of and of ).
Archimedean property: for every real there is a natural with ; and for every real there is a natural with (Every complete ordered field is Archimedean, For every in a complete ordered field there is a natural with ).
Reciprocals: implies , and implies (Inverses of positives are positive, and reciprocation reverses order).
Absolute value and ordered-field arithmetic: ; exactly when ; for ; the order is total; a real that is and smaller than every positive real is (Basic properties of the absolute value, Ordered field, Complete ordered field (least-upper-bound property)).
Proof
Normalisations. Since by [L2] and [L3], the hypothesis with the constant implies the same inequality with the constant ; so we may and do assume . Also, the hypothesis and the conclusion are symmetric in and and are trivial when , so it suffices to prove for with ; fix such a pair and put , a real with by [L3].
The exponent gap. Put , a rational with . By [L6] fix a natural with .
Subdividing. Let with and put and for . For one has , so by [L1]; and for . Define the sequence by , so that , , and for every .
The telescoped estimate. By [L5], , hence , the middle inequality being the hypothesis applied to the pair of points of and the last equality being the constant-sum rule of [L5].
The bound can be made arbitrarily small. Let a real be given and put . By [L6] fix a natural with ; then , since by [L3] and [L2]. By [L4] applied with the rational exponent to the bases , and by [L2] and [L3] which give , we get .
Rewriting the bound. By [L3], , and . Hence , and step 2.1 gives for every natural .
By [L4], : this is an equality if , since then both sides are by [L3], and it is the strict inequality of [L4] for the base and the exponents . Hence , so by [L7] and therefore .
Combining steps 3.1 and 3.2, . The real was arbitrary and , so by [L8], that is . Since in were arbitrary, and by the reduction of step 1.1, is constant on .
Remarks
-
The mechanism in one line. Splitting into equal pieces costs applications of the hypothesis, each of size , for a total of . For the factor is and the estimate says nothing new; for it grows and the estimate is useless; only for does it tend to , and then it forces the increment to vanish.
-
Why the vanishing of is proved rather than asserted. Neither real exponents nor a general theorem of the form is available at this point in the reading order, so the proof supplies the one rational instance it needs. The general real-power theory is developed later in Real powers for positive bases, with the zero-base positive-exponent convention ↗. Steps 2.2 and 3.2 supply the one instance that is needed, by reducing to the exponent with a natural number, where the -th root of Existence and uniqueness of -th roots: a unique with and the Archimedean property do the work.
-
The boundary case is exactly the Lipschitz condition, which does not force constancy: the identity is -Lipschitz and not constant. So the theorem is sharp at the endpoint of the range that Lipschitz map, -Hölder map for rational , and contraction admits, and the strict nesting of the classes below is witnessed on the companion page by On the function is -Hölder and is -Hölder for no rational , so the Hölder classes are strictly nested ↗.
Depends on
Continuity of at a point of and on : the - condition, its agreement with at a limit point, and continuity at an isolated point
Dictionary: for with the metric , continuity and uniform continuity of agree with the metric-space notions, the Lipschitz and Hölder conditions are the metric ones instantiated, and a subset of is compact in the open-cover sense of exactly when it is a compact metric subspace
Lipschitz map, -Hölder map for rational , and contraction
Contraction implies Lipschitz implies uniformly continuous implies continuous; every Hölder map is uniformly continuous, and a Lipschitz map on a bounded space is Hölder for every exponent
Rational powers of a positive base
Monotonicity of and of
Laws of rational exponents
Existence and uniqueness of -th roots: a unique with
Integer powers
Intervals of : the nine order-convex forms, nondegeneracy, and length
Finite sums and finite products, by recursion
Laws of finite sums and finite products
Triangle inequality for finite sums
Every complete ordered field is Archimedean
For every in a complete ordered field there is a natural with
Inverses of positives are positive, and reciprocation reverses order
Basic properties of the absolute value
Order on the rationals
Ordered field
Complete ordered field (least-upper-bound property)