Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Analytic perturbation remainder

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)) and the hypotheses of Simple-level reduced-resolvent coefficients on an arbitrary complex Hilbert space H, with inner product linear in the first variable: H0 is self-adjoint on its exact dense domain, E is an isolated simple eigenvalue with gap at least g>0, ψ0 is a normalized eigenvector, and V=V∗ is bounded with v=∥V∥. Let Pλ,Eλ be the contour projection and eigenvalue, Q=I−P0, S=ιQ(H0∣D(H0)∩QH−E)−1Q the actual reduced inverse, and ψ(λ) the gauge-fixed eigenvector with ⟨ψ(λ),ψ0⟩=1.

For v>0 put R=g/(8v). On the full complex disk ∣λ∣<R:

(a) q=2∣λ∣v/g≤1/4, ∥Pλ−P0∥≤1/3, ∥ψ(λ)∥≤2, and the holomorphic scalar energy identity is Eλ=⟨(H0+λV)ψ(λ),ψ0⟩=E+λ⟨Vψ(λ),ψ0⟩.

(b) The exact coefficients are E′(0)=⟨Vψ0,ψ0⟩,ψ′(0)=−SVψ0,E′′(0)=−2⟨VSVψ0,ψ0⟩, with bounds ∣E′(0)∣≤v, ∥ψ′(0)∥≤v/g and ∣E′′(0)∣≤2v2/g. The whole complementary spectral subspace, including its continuum, contributes through S. The cubic remainder satisfies ∣Eλ−E−λE′(0)−λ22E′′(0)∣≤Rv (∣λ∣/R)31−∣λ∣/R. At ∣λ∣=R/2 the displayed bound is Rv/4=g/32. For ∣λ∣≤R/2 it is at most 128v3∣λ∣3/g2.

(c) If v=0, then V=0 and Pλ=P0, Eλ=E, ψ(λ)=ψ0 for every complex λ; no radius involving division by v is used in this branch.

These conclusions are conditional on the strict positive gap and bounded perturbation, and do not assert an unbounded or degenerate perturbation theorem.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: CC and the exact data and conventions of the Statement. In the positive-norm branch R=g/(8v) and ∣λ∣<R.

[F1]

Contour perturbation projection supplies holomorphic Pλ,Eλ on q<1, the unique eigenvalue inside ∣z−E∣<g/2, domain-valued range and ∥Pλ−P0∥≤q/(1−q). Complex-coupling Riesz projections need not be orthogonal.

[F2]

Simple-level reduced-resolvent coefficients supplies the actual bounded self-adjoint S, ∥S∥≤1/g, its exact complementary domain inverses, the domain-valued holomorphic gauge with ⟨ψ,ψ0⟩=1 on q<1/2, and the exact three coefficients. These results hold under CC on arbitrary H.

[F3]

Cauchy's inequalities bound the Taylor coefficients by the circle supremum and Cauchy's integral formula on a circle compactly contained in a disc of holomorphy give ∣ck∣≤M/ρk for a scalar holomorphic function bounded by M on a circle of radius ρ contained with its disk in the holomorphy domain. Summing its Taylor tail is valid inside that circle.

[F4]

CC spectral calculus on an arbitrary complex Hilbert space by compatible vector-local Cayley subspaces gives the exact distance resolvent bound ∥(z−H0)−1∥≤1/dist⁡(z,σ(H0)) under CC on arbitrary H. Resolvent and spectrum of an unbounded operator specifies two-sided inverses on the actual domain; bounded Neumann inversion uses A bounded linear operator between normed spaces and The operator norm as the least bound and as the unit-sphere or unit-ball supremum.

Proof

1.1F1F4givenalgebra

[Actual spectral inclusion] Put t=∣λ∣v. Whenever dist⁡(z,σ(H0))>t, [F4] makes ∥λV(z−H0)−1∥<1. The factorization z−Hλ=[I−λV(z−H0)−1](z−H0) on D(H0) gives the two-sided inverse (z−H0)−1[I−λV(z−H0)−1]−1 into that domain. Hence every spectral point of Hλ is within distance t of σ(H0). By [F1], ∣Eλ−E∣<g/2, while every other point of σ(H0) is at distance at least g−∣Eλ−E∣>g/2>t from Eλ on q<1. Therefore ∣Eλ−E∣≤∣λ∣v. This is one-sided spectral inclusion, including complex coupling, not an exclusion inside the gap.

1.2F1F2givenalgebra

[Small-disk bounds and the correct scalar] On ∣λ∣≤R, q≤1/4 and [F1] gives ∥Pλ−P0∥≤1/3. Thus ∥Pλψ0∥≤4/3 and ∣⟨Pλψ0,ψ0⟩∣≥2/3, yielding ∥ψ∥≤2. Pairing the exact domain-valued eigenvalue equation of [F2] with the fixed second vector ψ0, self-adjointness gives ⟨H0ψ,ψ0⟩=⟨ψ,H0ψ0⟩=E and the gauge gives ⟨Eλψ,ψ0⟩=Eλ. Hence Eλ=E+λ⟨Vψ,ψ0⟩ is holomorphic, proving (a). The moving-vector pairing instead equals Eλ∥ψ∥2.

1.3F2givenalgebra

[Coefficients and norm constants] The coefficient identities follow from [F2]. Since ∥ψ0∥=1 and ∥S∥≤1/g, the operator norm products and Cauchy–Schwarz give ∣⟨Vψ0,ψ0⟩∣≤v, ∥SVψ0∥≤v/g, and 2∣⟨VSVψ0,ψ0⟩∣≤2v2/g. The actual reduced inverse contains all complementary spectral measures and not only discrete eigenvectors.

2.1step 1.1step 1.3F1F2F3givenalgebra

[Full-radius Cauchy remainder] The disk q<1 of [F1] contains a neighborhood of the closed radius-R disk. Thus f(λ)=Eλ−E is holomorphic there, and step 1.1 gives ∣f∣≤Rv on ∣λ∣=R. By [F3], writing f=∑k≥0ckλk, one has ∣ck∣≤Rv/Rk, c0=0, c1=E′(0) and c2=E′′(0)/2. Therefore the absolute sum over k≥3 is at most Rv∑k≥3(∣λ∣/R)k=Rv(∣λ∣/R)3/(1−∣λ∣/R), proving the complete cubic estimate. This uses the supplied spectral inclusion, not an exclusion of spectral points inside the gap.

3.1step 2.1F1F2givenalgebra∎

[Evaluations and the zero perturbation] At ∣λ∣=R/2 the geometric factor is (1/2)3/(1−1/2)=1/4, giving Rv/4=g/32. On ∣λ∣≤R/2, the denominator is at least 1/2, so the remainder is at most 2v∣λ∣3/R2=128v3∣λ∣3/g2. If v=0, then V=0 by the definition of operator norm, so the operator, contour projection, gauge and eigenvalue are constant for all complex couplings and all remainder coefficients vanish.

Remarks

The former moving-vector energy identity fails even for real coupling in the advertised small disk. Take H0=diag⁡(1,3), E=1, g=2, V=(0110) and λ=20/99<R=1/4. The eigenvalue is 97/99 and the gauge vector is (1,−1/10), of squared norm 101/100. Thus ⟨Hλψ,ψ⟩=9797/9900≠97/99, whereas pairing with the fixed ψ0=(1,0) gives the correct energy.

The former interior resolvent exclusion also fails: for H0=diag⁡(0,1), V=diag⁡(1,0), E=0, g=v=1, and λ=z=1/16, z is an eigenvalue although ∣z−E∣<g/2−∣λ∣v=7/16. The valid Neumann condition is distance from all of σ(H0) greater than ∣λ∣v, and leads to one-sided spectral inclusion as proved in step 1.1. The former evaluated remainder value g/64 was an arithmetic error; the displayed general bound evaluates to g/32, without any assertion that it is attained.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources