Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

L^2 potential infinitesimal kinetic bound

Statement

Assume Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)). Let V∈L2(R3;R) and let H0=−Δ with D(H0)=W2,2(R3;C) be the free operator (Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms), constructed below as the maximal Fourier multiplier with the 2π convention. Then:

(a) Sup-norm interpolation. There is a constant C such that for every u∈H2(R3) and every R≥1,

∥u∥∞≤C(R3/2∥u∥2+R−1/2∥Δu∥2).

(b) Infinitesimal smallness. The multiplier MV with D(MV)={u∈L2:Vu∈L2} is H0-bounded with relative bound 0: for every η>0 there is bη<∞ such that

∥Vu∥2≤η∥H0u∥2+bη∥u∥2(u∈D(H0)).

(c) Self-adjointness. H=H0+MV is self-adjoint on D(H0) and bounded below.

The potential is real valued but need not be bounded, continuous or compactly supported; no decay rate is assumed. All original parts (a)-(c) retain this full potential class and CC alone.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: CC, real V∈L2(R3), the free weak Laplacian on W2,2, u∈H2, R≥1 and η>0.

[F1]

The unitary Plancherel transform Plancherel theorem uses f^(ξ)=∫f(x)e−2πix⋅ξdx on Schwartz functions. The CC Sobolev characterisation Integer-order W^{k,2} and H^k agree with equivalent norms and weak multiplier identity Distributional derivatives are polynomial Fourier multipliers identify W2,2 with {u:∣ξ∣2F2u∈L2} and give F2(−Δu)=4π2∣ξ∣2F2u. No AC-bearing composite free/bounded-potential result is used.

[F2]

Cauchy-Schwarz Cauchy-Schwarz inequality for L2 and spherical integration give ∫∣ξ∣≤Rdξ=4πR3/3 and ∫∣ξ∣>R∣ξ∣−4dξ=4π/R. Dominated convergence is Dominated convergence. The CC injection of local integrable functions into distributions Locally integrable functions embed in distributions permits identification of an integral representative by testing against compact smooth functions.

[F3]

The actual CC supplier CC spectral calculus on a Hilbert space with a fixed countable dense sequence gives a unique regular PVM for a self-adjoint operator on a Hilbert space with a specified countable dense sequence, including the exact square-integrability domain and bounded/unbounded Borel calculus. On L2(R3;C) use the specified enumeration of rational complex linear combinations of rational bounded-box indicators: real density is Rational box-step functions form a countable dense subset of Lp(Rn) for 1≤p<∞, and approximating the real and imaginary parts gives complex density. This concrete CC calculus, not an AC spectral theorem, is used for the lower bound after self-adjointness has been proved.

Proof

1.1F1F2givenconstructalgebra

Maximal free multiplier and its actual domain: put a(ξ)=4π2∣ξ∣2, and define Ma on D(Ma)={f∈L2:af∈L2}. This domain is dense because 1a≤nf∈D(Ma) and these cutoffs converge to any f∈L2 by dominated convergence. It is symmetric because a is real. If g∈D(Ma∗) and h=Ma∗g, test the adjoint identity against every L2 vector supported on {a≤n}; multiplication by a is bounded there, and the identity gives 1a≤nh=a1a≤ng. These sets exhaust the space, so ag=h∈L2 and g∈D(Ma). Conversely, ag∈L2 gives the adjoint identity by Cauchy-Schwarz. Thus Ma=Ma∗ including domains. By unitary transport and [F1], H0=F2∗MaF2 is self-adjoint on precisely W2,2 and agrees with the weak Laplacian. Its explicit inverse at z=±iμ, μ>0, is Qz=F2∗M(a−z)−1F2; one has ∥Qz∥≤μ−1 and ∥H0Qz∥≤1. At z=−s, s>0, the same formula gives ∥Q−s∥≤s−1 and ∥H0Q−s∥≤1. Each inverse maps onto the exact free domain, as multiplying by a−z verifies both inverse equations.

2.1F1F2step 1.1constructalgebra

Fourier sup interpolation, with the representative justified: write u^=F2u. By [F2], ∫∣ξ∣≤R∣u^∣≤4π/3 R3/2∥u∥2 and ∫∣ξ∣>R∣u^∣≤4π R−1/2∥∣ξ∣2u^∥2=4π R−1/2∥H0u∥2/(4π2). In particular u^∈L1. The absolutely convergent inverse integral v(x)=∫u^(ξ)e2πix⋅ξdξ defines a bounded continuous function. For any compact smooth test function φ, Fubini gives ∫vφ‾=∫u^ φ^‾=⟨u,φ⟩ by Plancherel; absolute integrability for Fubini follows from ∥u^∥1∥φ∥1<∞. Thus v−u has zero distribution and [F2] gives v=u almost everywhere. Taking the essential supremum of its inverse integral yields (a), with C=max⁡{4π/3,4π/(4π2)}, and ∥H0u∥2=∥Δu∥2.

3.1F2step 2.1constructalgebra

Full unbounded potential bound and symmetry: V is finite almost everywhere and ∥Vu∥2≤∥V∥2∥u∥∞ for every u∈W2,2, so D(H0)⊆D(MV). Step 2.1 gives ∥Vu∥2≤C∥V∥2R−1/2∥H0u∥2+C∥V∥2R3/2∥u∥2. Given η>0, choose R=max⁡{1,(C∥V∥2/η)2} and set bη=C∥V∥2R3/2; then the asserted relative estimate holds, including V=0, and the relative bound is 0. Realness of V gives ⟨Vu,w⟩=⟨u,Vw⟩ for u,w∈D(MV): the two equal integrands are absolutely integrable by the L2 Cauchy-Schwarz bounds. In particular the restriction of MV to D(H0) is symmetric, even when V is unbounded. The maximal multiplier itself has no artificial bounded-potential hypothesis.

4.1step 1.1step 3.1constructalgebra

Two nonreal Neumann inverses on the exact domain: fix η=1/4 in step 3.1 and write b=b1/4≥0. For z=±iμ with μ>4b, step 1.1 gives ∥MVQz∥≤1/4+b/μ<1/2. Hence Lz=I+MVQz has the norm-convergent inverse ∑n≥0(−MVQz)n, whose norm is at most 2; multiplication of partial geometric sums and passage to the norm limit verify both inverse identities. On D(H0) the exact factorization is H−z=Lz(H0−z). Therefore Xz=QzLz−1 maps L2 into D(H0) and is a two-sided inverse of H−z:D(H0)→L2, with ∥Xz∥≤2/μ. Both signs use the same estimate; the order QzLz−1 is essential. This is an explicit domain argument, not an invocation of Kato-Rellich.

4.2step 1.1step 3.1constructalgebra

All sufficiently negative real inverses: for every s>4b, the explicit Q−s=(H0+s)−1 from step 1.1 similarly satisfies ∥MVQ−s∥≤1/4+b/s<1/2. The same geometric series gives the inverse of I+MVQ−s and the factorization H+s=(I+MVQ−s)(H0+s) on D(H0). Thus every real λ=−s<−4b lies in the resolvent set, with bounded inverse Xλ=Q−s(I+MVQ−s)−1 and norm at most 2/s. This establishes a whole negative half-line of resolvent points; a single negative resolvent point alone would not prove a lower bound.

5.1step 1.1step 3.1step 4.1algebra

Exact adjoint domain: H is densely defined because D(H)=D(H0) is dense, and it is symmetric by steps 1.1 and 3.1. Let y∈D(H∗) and choose μ>4b. Step 4.1 supplies x∈D(H0) solving (H−iμ)x=(H∗−iμ)y. Symmetry gives H∗x=Hx, so w=y−x satisfies (H∗−iμ)w=0. For every v∈D(H) the adjoint identity implies ⟨(H+iμ)v,w⟩=0; since H+iμ is onto by the other sign of step 4.1, w=0. Hence y=x∈D(H) and H∗y=Hy. Together with symmetry this proves H=H∗ including the exact domain D(H0), for every real L2 potential. No extra separability of a potential range or boundedness of V was introduced.

6.1F3step 4.2step 5.1constructalgebra∎

Negative spectral support and lower bound under CC: apply [F3] to the self-adjoint H of step 5.1 on the fixed-dense-sequence space L2(R3). Put L=4b+1. For each λ<−L, step 4.2 gives a bounded inverse Xλ and hence ∥(H−λ)v∥≥cλ∥v∥ on D(H), where cλ=∥Xλ∥−1>0. For Iλ=(λ−cλ/2,λ+cλ/2), a vector in the range of EH(Iλ) lies in D(H) because that interval is bounded; its spectral norm formula gives ∥(H−λ)v∥≤(cλ/2)∥v∥, so v=0 and EH(Iλ)=0. Consider all rational-endpoint intervals J⊂(−∞,−L) with EH(J)=0. They form a countable collection and cover (−∞,−L): at each λ choose rational endpoints enclosing it within the open spectral hole Iλ∩(−∞,−L). This existence argument chooses no uncountably indexed family; taking all such rational intervals is canonical. Countable subadditivity of each scalar spectral measure yields EH((−∞,−L))=0. Therefore for u∈D(H), ⟨Hu,u⟩=∫t dμu(t)≥−L∥u∥22; the integral is absolutely convergent by its second-moment domain condition and Cauchy-Schwarz. This proves boundedness below. Parts (a), (b) and (c) are respectively steps 2.1, 3.1 and 5.1 together with this step.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources