Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedverified 2026-10-15 (gpt-6-luna, gpt-6.1-sol, and delegated Codex review/repair agents; see completed run evidence)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Full-mass unpolarized formal pair-production coefficient

Statement

Let m,M≥0 be the electron and muon rest energies in joules. Use the positive shells of Two-body phase-space and formal coefficient data: pi=(Ei,pi) with Ei=∣pi∣2+m2>0 for i=1,2, and ki=(εi,ki) with εi=∣ki∣2+M2>0 for i=1,2. With p1+p2=k1+k2=P, set s=h(P,P)>4max⁡(m2,M2), using the algebraic metric h=(+,−,−,−) of QFT example units, metric, gauge, and pairing conventions. Since P0=E1+E2>0 and h(P,P)=s>0, P is future timelike. A center-of-momentum map is a proper orthochronous linear h-Lorentz map Λ with ΛThΛ=h, det⁡Λ=1, Λ(C+)=C+ for C+={(E,q)∈R×R3:E≥∣q∣}, and ΛP=(s,0). Write p1∗ and k1∗ for the spatial components of Λp1 and Λk1, respectively. The strict threshold makes both nonzero; define θ∈[0,π] by cos⁡θ=(p1∗⋅R3k1∗)/(∣p1∗∣∣k1∗∣). This angle is independent of the chosen center-of-momentum map because any two choices differ by a spatial rotation. For a,b∈{0,1,2,3}, set hab=hab equal to the diagonal entries of h=diag⁡(1,−1,−1,−1), sum repeated Lorentz indices over this range, and define γa:=∑b=03habγb and Pa:=∑b=03habPb. Use the dimensionless coupling g=4πα from QFT example units, metric, gauge, and pairing conventions. Adopt only the formal single-photon tree coefficient M=g2s[vˉ(p2)γau(p1)][uˉ(k1)γav(k2)], with equal weight 1/4 on the four initial spin-label pairs and a sum over final spin labels. The outgoing labels denote the distinct μ− and μ+ species, so Sf=1 in the coefficient map. With the spinor normalization of Clifford traces and normalized spin completeness, M is dimensionless. No interacting continuum S-matrix or exact QED cross section is assumed.

In the auxiliary finite-matrix setting of [L1], assume d≥1, an invertible K0, and the stated covariance of K0 and V under the finite-graph phase action; then the coefficientwise inverse and covariance identities in [L1] hold. Separately stipulate the displayed formal pair-production amplitude above. Its on-shell spin average is ∣M∣2‾=g4[3−βe2−βμ2+βe2βμ2cos⁡2θ],βe=1−4m2s,βμ=1−4M2s, where the angle θ is defined above. The resulting formal differential and total coefficients are dσcoeffdΩ=α2(ℏc)2βμ4sβe[3−βe2−βμ2+βe2βμ2cos⁡2θ], σcoeff=πα2(ℏc)2sβμβe[3−βe2−βμ2+13βe2βμ2]. If δ=4m2/s≤1/2, the full differential coefficient divided by its m=0 value is between 1 and 1+4δ. This bound concerns only omission of the incoming electron mass in this formal tree coefficient, not loop, soft-radiation, threshold, or empirical errors.

The same on-shell equations give Pavˉ(p2)γau(p1)=0 and Pauˉ(k1)γav(k2)=0. Thus a propagator term proportional to PaPb does not change this specified tree coefficient. These current cancellations are proved locally for all m,M≥0; the actual QFT-MG03 matrix-Ward carrier supplies only its finite-matrix inverse and covariance interface, not the broader tree-current clauses in the historical Q7 research module.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Assume Countable Choice as inherited from Clifford traces and normalized spin completeness and Complete two-body phase space and coefficient flux map. Use their spinor normalization, gamma trace conventions, positive-shell conventions, flux, and coefficient map, with pi and ki satisfying the shell conditions and θ defined in the Statement. Let s>4max⁡(m2,M2).

[F1]

QFT example units, metric, gauge, and pairing conventions: h=−η, energy-vector components and rest energies are in joules, and g2=4πα with dimensionless α.

[F2]

Clifford traces and normalized spin completeness: ∑susuˉs=p̸+m, ∑svsvˉs=p̸−m, the corresponding on-shell Dirac equations, and the two- and four-gamma trace formulas.

[F3]

Complete two-body phase space and coefficient flux map: for finite incoming and outgoing label sets, normalized initial weights, Borel amplitudes, and F>0, the cross-section map is dσcoeff=(ℏc)2∣A∣2‾dΦ2/(FSf); dΦ2/dΩ=k∗/(16π2s). For equal incoming rest energy m, βe=1−4m2/s and F=2sβe; distinguishable final particles have Sf=1. Its sphere angular measure dΩ is the chart surface measure and is invariant under orthogonal maps, as established there from its sphere-measure prerequisite.

[L1]

Finite/formal gauge covariance and matrix Ward identity: for its finite-dimensional formal matrices K(z;ζ)=K0(ζ)+zV(ζ) and S(z;ζ), with d≥1, invertible K0, and coefficient covariance under its finite-graph phase action, the actual batch-45 statement says S is a two-sided inverse in Md(C⟦z⟧) and transforms coefficientwise as S(z;ζθ)=DθS(z;ζ)Dθ−1. It also states δK=i[Θ,K], δS=i[Θ,S]=−S(δK)S, and the ordinary finite-matrix resolvent identity. The carrier exists in the current QFT-MG03 manifest but has no Step-1 readiness record. Its transitive prerequisite items and unresolved readiness are recorded in the batch-46 cross-batch evidence. The broader Q7 research-module clauses about free Dirac propagators and on-shell currents are not part of this item's actual Statement and are not used as supplier claims here.

[A1]

The amplitude displayed in the Statement is adopted as a formal tree coefficient with the stated uniform initial-spin average and final-spin sum; it is not asserted to be an exact amplitude of a constructed continuum theory.

Proof

1.1givenA1F2algebra

By [F2], the spin sums reduce the squared-current factors to Leab=14Tr⁡[(̸p2−m)γa(̸p1+m)γb],Lμ,ab=Tr⁡[(̸k1+M)γa(̸k2−M)γb]. The odd traces vanish. Expanding the even terms with [F2] and using p1⋅p2+m2=s/2 and k1⋅k2+M2=s/2 gives Leab=p2ap1b+p2bp1a−s2hab,Lμ,ab=4(k1ak2b+k1bk2a−s2hab). These mass-shell dot products follow from (p1+p2)2=(k1+k2)2=s.

2.1step 1.1F2algebra

Contracting the tensors gives LeabLμ,ab=4{2[(p2⋅k1)(p1⋅k2)+(p2⋅k2)(p1⋅k1)]+s2−s(p1⋅p2+k1⋅k2)}. The two cross-metric terms contribute −s(p1⋅p2+k1⋅k2), while the metric-metric term contributes s2; substituting p1⋅p2=(s−2m2)/2 and k1⋅k2=(s−2M2)/2 reduces the last two terms to s(m2+M2).

2.2L1A1F2step 1.1algebra

The finite matrix hypothesis [L1] supplies coefficientwise inverse and phase-covariance identities only for its specified finite graph kernel. For the separate amplitude in [A1], the spinor equations from [F2] give vˉ(p2)̸p2=−mvˉ(p2) and ̸p1u(p1)=mu(p1), so their sum contracted with the incoming current is zero. Likewise uˉ(k1)̸k1=Muˉ(k1) and ̸k2v(k2)=−Mv(k2), so the outgoing current is transverse to P=k1+k2. A longitudinal propagator term is therefore multiplied by two zero contractions. No broader tree-current claim is taken from [L1].

3.1step 2.1F1F2F3algebra

In the center-of-momentum frame, the equal-mass positive-shell formulas of [F3] give ∣p1∗∣=sβe/2 and ∣k1∗∣=sβμ/2. By the definition of θ in the Statement, the four cross-dot-products in step 2.1 are s/4±∣p1∗∣∣k1∗∣cos⁡θ, with each sign occurring twice. Substitution into step 2.1 and multiplication by g4/s2 gives ∣M∣2‾=g4[3−βe2−βμ2+βe2βμ2cos⁡2θ]. Each basis spinor ξ±,s is dimensionless, so us and vs have units J1/2; each current has units J, and g2/s has units J−2. Thus M is dimensionless as required by the coefficient map. For each outgoing direction n∈S2, the rank-two projections P+ and P− of [F2] depend continuously on n, since the outgoing energies are positive. For either projection field P(n), the sets on which each fixed pair of columns P(n)ej,P(n)ek is linearly independent are open and cover S2: a rank-two matrix has two linearly independent columns. Order the six pairs and partition S2 by the first pair whose columns are independent. On each Borel piece, Gram--Schmidt gives a Borel orthonormal frame of the range. Thus the outgoing spinors can be chosen Borel in n; the incoming spinors are fixed. The spin-resolved amplitudes are Borel, and their finite spin-label sums are Borel. The trace formula already computed makes the averaged squared amplitude continuous. [F2] The strict threshold gives positive βe,βμ, and [F3] gives incoming flux F=2sβe>0.

4.1step 3.1F1F3algebra

For distinguishable final particles, [F3] gives dΦ2/dΩ=βμ/(32π2) and F=2sβe. Substituting the squared amplitude from step 3.1 into [F3] yields the displayed differential coefficient after using g4=(4πα)2. To integrate, choose the polar axis along p1∗ and write the outgoing unit direction as X(θ,φ)=(sin⁡θcos⁡φ,sin⁡θsin⁡φ,cos⁡θ). The phase-space angular measure is the chart surface measure on S2 and is invariant under rotations by [F3]. This chart has area density sin⁡θ; the omitted meridian and poles have zero chart area. Thus ∫S2dΩ=2π∫0πsin⁡θ dθ=4π and ∫S2cos⁡2θ dΩ=2π∫0πcos⁡2θsin⁡θ dθ=4π/3. This gives the displayed total coefficient.

5.1step 4.1algebra∎

For δ=4m2/s≤1/2, set B0=2−βμ2+βμ2cos⁡2θ and Q=1−βμ2cos⁡2θ. Then B0≥1, 0≤Q≤1, and the ratio of the full coefficient to its m=0 value is R=(B0+δQ)/(B01−δ)≥1. Also R−1=11−δ−1+δQB01−δ≤22 δ≤4δ, because 1/1−δ−1=δ/(1−δ(1+1−δ))≤2 δ for 0≤δ≤1/2, and B01−δ≥1/2. This compares only the two formal tree coefficients.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources