Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedverified 2026-10-15 (gpt-6-luna, gpt-6.1-sol, and delegated Codex review/repair agents; see completed run evidence)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Complete two-body phase space and coefficient flux map

Statement

Assume Countable Choice The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω), and use QFT example units, metric, gauge, and pairing conventions and Two-body phase-space and formal coefficient data. Write HM+={(E,q)∈(0,∞)×R3:E=∣q∣2+M2} for the positive shell in that Definition, and C+={(E,q)∈R×R3:E≥∣q∣} for the closed future cone of h=(+,−,−,−). A proper orthochronous linear h-Lorentz map is a real linear Λ with ΛThΛ=h, det⁡Λ=1, and Λ(C+)=C+. For energy four-vectors on these positive shells, the shell measure νM defined there is invariant under every such map. Let M1,M2≥0, let P be future timelike, meaning P0>0 and h(P,P)>0, set s=h(P,P)>(M1+M2)2, and write Ei(r)=r2+Mi2. Let f be a nonnegative Borel function on HM1+×HM2+. For a proper orthochronous h-Lorentz map ΛP with ΛPP=(s,0), define Φ2,P as the pushforward of the angular measure Φ2 from that Definition under n⟼(ΛP−1(E1∗,k∗n),ΛP−1(E2∗,−k∗n)), where Ei∗ and k∗ are from Two-body phase-space and formal coefficient data. The proof below shows that Φ2,P is independent of the choice of ΛP; for P=(s,0) it is the pushforward (Ψ2)#Φ2 under the center-of-momentum map Ψ2 defined there. The standard two-body on-shell integral (2π)4∫dνM1(k1)dνM2(k2) δ(4)(P−k1−k2) f(k1,k2) is interpreted by first evaluating the spatial delta in k2, then the one-dimensional energy delta by the increasing radial change of variable r↦E1(r)+E2(r). Explicitly, for each fixed angular direction and nonnegative Borel radial function g:(0,∞)→[0,∞], the radial action after spatial evaluation is ∫0∞g(r)δ(s−E1(r)−E2(r)) dr=g(k∗)/(d(E1+E2)/dr∣k∗); this is the pushforward evaluation under that C1 diffeomorphism, not a product of distributions. It equals ∫f dΦ2,P. The threshold root is k∗ in that Definition, and Φ2,P(HM1+×HM2+)=Φ2(S2)=k∗4πs. For equal rest energies M1=M2=M, set β=1−4M2/s; then k∗=sβ/2 and Φ2,P(HM+×HM+)=Φ2(S2)=β/(8π). For the scattering flux identities, take incoming pi=(Ei,pi)∈HMi,in+, where Mi,in≥0, and require p1+p2=P. A center-of-momentum map is a proper orthochronous h-Lorentz map Λ with ΛP=(s,0); write Λp1=(E1∗,p1∗) and define p∗=∣p1∗∣. The value is independent of the choice of Λ, since two such maps differ by a spatial rotation. Their invariant flux is F=4p∗s. For equal incoming rest energies Min≥0 with s≥4Min2, define βin=1−4Min2/s; then p∗=sβin/2 and F=2sβin. For finite nonempty incoming and outgoing label sets, normalized initial weights, and the Borel amplitude family of the Definition, whenever F>0 the cross-section coefficient map gives dσcoeffdΩ=(ℏc)264π2s k∗p∗ ∣A∣2‾Sf. For a parent at rest, represented by P0=(M0,0) with M0>2M, and two equal-rest-energy daughters on HM+ with total four-vector P0 and constant amplitude GE in joules, the rate coefficient is ∣GE∣21−4M2/M02/(32πℏM0) when the daughters are identical. This is a coefficient calculation, not a claim of exponential survival.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Assume Countable Choice. Let the common total P be future timelike with h(P,P)=s>(M1+M2)2. For scattering, take pi=(Ei,pi)∈HMi,in+ with p1+p2=P and positive center-of-momentum momentum magnitude p∗>0, using the center-of-momentum definition in the Statement. Use the shell and coefficient definitions above, including the finite label sets, normalized initial weights, and Borel amplitude family. Let f be nonnegative Borel on HM1+×HM2+.

[F1]

QFT example units, metric, gauge, and pairing conventions: h=−η is the algebraic contraction, energy-vector components and rest energies are in joules, and ℏc converts inverse-length coordinates to energy coordinates.

[F2]

Two-body phase-space and formal coefficient data: the positive M-shell is parameterized by p=(E,p) with E=∣p∣2+M2>0; dνM=d3p/((2π)3 2E), dΦ2=k∗dΩ/(16π2s), and F=4(p1⋅p2)2−M1,in2M2,in2 for incoming vectors on their stated positive shells. For F>0, the finite-label Borel amplitude family has coefficient map dσcoeff=(ℏc)2∣A∣2‾dΦ2/(FSf); a specified single-channel decay amplitude has extended map Γcoeff=∫∣G∣2dΦ2/(2ℏM0Sf), finite when the integral is finite.

[F3]

Borel change of variables from the compact-support formula and Radon uniqueness: under Countable Choice, a C1 diffeomorphism between open Euclidean sets transforms every nonnegative Borel integral by its absolute Jacobian; no completed-measurable extension is asserted.

[F4]

Agreement with the existing polar sphere measure: under Countable Choice, chart surface measure on S2 equals the polar surface measure and is preserved by orthogonal maps.

Proof

1.1givenF1algebraconstruct

Let a=(a0,a) be any future unit vector, so a0>0 and a02−∣a∣2=1. If a=0, put B=I. Otherwise put r=∣a∣, n=a/r, and define B to act by (a0rra0) on span⁡(e0,n) and by the identity on its spatial orthogonal complement. In both cases B preserves h, has determinant one, preserves the future cone, and sends e0 to a. For any proper orthochronous h-Lorentz map Λ, apply this construction to a=Λe0; then B−1Λ fixes e0 and restricts to a proper spatial rotation on e0⊥. Thus every such Λ is a boost followed by a spatial rotation. The construction also gives, for every future unit vector a, an inverse boost taking a to e0.

2.1step 1.1F3algebra

A spatial rotation has Jacobian one and leaves E fixed. By step 1.1, it remains to check a boost directed along the first spatial axis. For that boost, p1′=a0p1+rE and E′=a0E+rp1, so ∂p1′/∂p1=a0+rp1/E=E′/E>0; the other spatial coordinates are unchanged. The inverse boost is obtained by replacing r with −r, so this spatial map is a C1 diffeomorphism. By [F3], d3p′=(E′/E)d3p in every nonnegative Borel integral, and therefore d3p′/(2E′)=d3p/(2E). This proves shell-measure invariance under the boost and, using the rotation factorization, under every proper orthochronous h-Lorentz map.

3.1givenstep 1.1step 2.1F2F4algebra

Apply the boost construction in step 1.1 to the future unit vector P/s; its inverse takes P/s to e0. Any two maps taking P/s to e0 differ by a Lorentz map fixing e0, hence by a spatial rotation on e0⊥; orthogonal invariance in [F4] therefore makes Φ2,P independent of the chosen map. Under the chosen map, write f~(k1,k2)=f(ΛP−1k1,ΛP−1k2). Step 2.1 preserves each shell measure, and ∣det⁡ΛP∣=1 preserves the four-dimensional delta, so the integral reduces to the rest-frame calculation with f~. Integrating the spatial delta first sets k2=−k1 and gives the remaining radial-angular measure f~((E1(r),rn),(E2(r),−rn))4(2π)2E1(r)E2(r)r2 dr dΩ δ(s−E1(r)−E2(r)). Here d3k1=r2dr dΩ by [F4].

4.1step 3.1givenF2F3F4algebra

For r>0, E1(r)+E2(r) is strictly increasing, with derivative r(1/E1+1/E2)>0. The threshold assumption gives a unique root k∗>0. At this root, E1+E2=s and E1−E2=(M12−M22)/s, so E1=(s+M12−M22)/(2s), E2=(s−M12+M22)/(2s), and k∗2=E12−M12=[s−(M1+M2)2][s−(M1−M2)2]4s. The derivative at the root is k∗s/(E1E2). Applying [F3] to the one-dimensional increasing change of variable in step 3.1, for each fixed n, gives the angular density f~((E1∗,k∗n),(E2∗,−k∗n))k∗dΩ/(16π2s). Integrating this nonnegative Borel density in the stipulated order gives exactly ∫f dΦ2,P by its pushforward definition. In the center-of-momentum frame, this is the pushforward (Ψ2)#Φ2 from the Definition, where Φ2 is a measure on S2. To compute the angular total, use X(ϑ,φ)=(sin⁡ϑcos⁡φ,sin⁡ϑsin⁡φ,cos⁡ϑ) for 0<ϑ<π and 0<φ<2π; its chart-area density is ∣∂ϑX×∂φX∣=sin⁡ϑ. The omitted meridian and poles are null in the two-dimensional chart measure, so Ω(S2)=∫0π∫02πsin⁡ϑ dφ dϑ=4π. It follows that Φ2(S2)=k∗/(4πs). For equal daughter energies M, this gives k∗=sβ/2 and Φ2(S2)=β/(8π), where β=1−4M2/s.

5.1step 3.1step 4.1givenF2algebra

In the incoming center-of-momentum frame from step 3.1, write p1=(E1,p∗) and p2=(E2,−p∗), so E1+E2=s. The mass-shell equations give p1⋅p2=E1E2+p∗2 and Mi,in2=Ei2−p∗2. Direct expansion yields (p1⋅p2)2−M1,in2M2,in2=(E1E2+p∗2)2−(E12−p∗2)(E22−p∗2)=p∗2(E1+E2)2=sp∗2, so [F2] gives F=4p∗s. If the incoming rest energies are equal to Min, then E1=E2=s/2 and p∗2=s/4−Min2; since p∗>0, p∗=sβin/2 and F=2sβin. Combining the phase-space density from step 4.1 with [F2]'s coefficient map yields dσcoeffdΩ=(ℏc)264π2sk∗p∗∣A∣2‾Sf.

6.1step 4.1F2algebra∎

For a parent at rest with energy M0>2M and two equal-mass daughters, step 4.1 gives ∫dΦ2=1−4M2/M02/(8π). The decay coefficient map in [F2] divides ∣GE∣2∫dΦ2 by 2ℏM0Sf; for identical daughters Sf=2, this is ∣GE∣21−4M2/M02/(32πℏM0). Its units are J2/(J s J)=s−1. No survival law enters this coefficient calculation.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources