How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Complete two-body phase space and coefficient flux map
Statement
Assume Countable Choice The Axiom of Countable Choice (), and use QFT example units, metric, gauge, and pairing conventions and Two-body phase-space and formal coefficient data. Write for the positive shell in that Definition, and for the closed future cone of . A proper orthochronous linear -Lorentz map is a real linear with , , and . For energy four-vectors on these positive shells, the shell measure defined there is invariant under every such map. Let , let be future timelike, meaning and , set , and write . Let be a nonnegative Borel function on . For a proper orthochronous -Lorentz map with , define as the pushforward of the angular measure from that Definition under where and are from Two-body phase-space and formal coefficient data. The proof below shows that is independent of the choice of ; for it is the pushforward under the center-of-momentum map defined there. The standard two-body on-shell integral is interpreted by first evaluating the spatial delta in , then the one-dimensional energy delta by the increasing radial change of variable . Explicitly, for each fixed angular direction and nonnegative Borel radial function , the radial action after spatial evaluation is ; this is the pushforward evaluation under that diffeomorphism, not a product of distributions. It equals . The threshold root is in that Definition, and For equal rest energies , set ; then and . For the scattering flux identities, take incoming , where , and require . A center-of-momentum map is a proper orthochronous -Lorentz map with ; write and define . The value is independent of the choice of , since two such maps differ by a spatial rotation. Their invariant flux is . For equal incoming rest energies with , define ; then and . For finite nonempty incoming and outgoing label sets, normalized initial weights, and the Borel amplitude family of the Definition, whenever the cross-section coefficient map gives For a parent at rest, represented by with , and two equal-rest-energy daughters on with total four-vector and constant amplitude in joules, the rate coefficient is when the daughters are identical. This is a coefficient calculation, not a claim of exponential survival.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Assume Countable Choice. Let the common total be future timelike with . For scattering, take with and positive center-of-momentum momentum magnitude , using the center-of-momentum definition in the Statement. Use the shell and coefficient definitions above, including the finite label sets, normalized initial weights, and Borel amplitude family. Let be nonnegative Borel on .
QFT example units, metric, gauge, and pairing conventions: is the algebraic contraction, energy-vector components and rest energies are in joules, and converts inverse-length coordinates to energy coordinates.
Two-body phase-space and formal coefficient data: the positive -shell is parameterized by with ; , , and for incoming vectors on their stated positive shells. For , the finite-label Borel amplitude family has coefficient map ; a specified single-channel decay amplitude has extended map , finite when the integral is finite.
Borel change of variables from the compact-support formula and Radon uniqueness: under Countable Choice, a diffeomorphism between open Euclidean sets transforms every nonnegative Borel integral by its absolute Jacobian; no completed-measurable extension is asserted.
Agreement with the existing polar sphere measure: under Countable Choice, chart surface measure on equals the polar surface measure and is preserved by orthogonal maps.
Proof
Let be any future unit vector, so and . If , put . Otherwise put , , and define to act by on and by the identity on its spatial orthogonal complement. In both cases preserves , has determinant one, preserves the future cone, and sends to . For any proper orthochronous -Lorentz map , apply this construction to ; then fixes and restricts to a proper spatial rotation on . Thus every such is a boost followed by a spatial rotation. The construction also gives, for every future unit vector , an inverse boost taking to .
A spatial rotation has Jacobian one and leaves fixed. By step 1.1, it remains to check a boost directed along the first spatial axis. For that boost, and , so ; the other spatial coordinates are unchanged. The inverse boost is obtained by replacing with , so this spatial map is a diffeomorphism. By [F3], in every nonnegative Borel integral, and therefore . This proves shell-measure invariance under the boost and, using the rotation factorization, under every proper orthochronous -Lorentz map.
Apply the boost construction in step 1.1 to the future unit vector ; its inverse takes to . Any two maps taking to differ by a Lorentz map fixing , hence by a spatial rotation on ; orthogonal invariance in [F4] therefore makes independent of the chosen map. Under the chosen map, write . Step 2.1 preserves each shell measure, and preserves the four-dimensional delta, so the integral reduces to the rest-frame calculation with . Integrating the spatial delta first sets and gives the remaining radial-angular measure Here by [F4].
For , is strictly increasing, with derivative . The threshold assumption gives a unique root . At this root, and , so , , and The derivative at the root is . Applying [F3] to the one-dimensional increasing change of variable in step 3.1, for each fixed , gives the angular density . Integrating this nonnegative Borel density in the stipulated order gives exactly by its pushforward definition. In the center-of-momentum frame, this is the pushforward from the Definition, where is a measure on . To compute the angular total, use for and ; its chart-area density is . The omitted meridian and poles are null in the two-dimensional chart measure, so . It follows that . For equal daughter energies , this gives and , where .
In the incoming center-of-momentum frame from step 3.1, write and , so . The mass-shell equations give and . Direct expansion yields so [F2] gives . If the incoming rest energies are equal to , then and ; since , and . Combining the phase-space density from step 4.1 with [F2]'s coefficient map yields
For a parent at rest with energy and two equal-mass daughters, step 4.1 gives . The decay coefficient map in [F2] divides by ; for identical daughters , this is . Its units are . No survival law enters this coefficient calculation.