Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedverified 2026-10-15 (gpt-6-luna, gpt-6.1-sol, and delegated Codex review/repair agents; see completed run evidence)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

All regular formal temporal causal-factorization coefficients

Statement

Assume the current scalar suppliers Tempered time-ordered scalar two-point carrier, Smeared free scalar field and its Poincare representation, and Causal support of the scalar commutator distribution at exactly their displayed draft interfaces. Let Wμ be the relative-coordinate scalar Wightman distribution from the smeared-field supplier, and let Hμ be the time-ordered relative-coordinate distribution from the time-ordered-kernel supplier. Form their translation-invariant bidistributions by the construction in Regular time-ordered contraction coefficients.

Let V,U∈Preg(R4) have compact supports A,B, respectively. If A≽outB, as defined in Regular time-ordered contraction coefficients, then SzH(V+U)=SzH(V)⋆WμSzH(U) coefficientwise in z. If every difference x−y, x∈A, y∈B, is spacelike, then F⋆WμG=G⋆WμF for regular F,G supported in A,B; the corresponding formal series commute coefficientwise. These are formal identities for regular functionals only. They assert neither convergence in the coupling nor a local Wick-product or continuum-interaction construction.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The formal parameter conventions, the three current QFT supplier interfaces, and the regular algebra and contraction definitions.

[A1]

The coupling z is formal, and η is an invertible formal bookkeeping parameter fixed by the involution. Equality of Sz series means equality of every coefficient.

[F1]

The time-ordered-kernel carrier is currently a draft whose statement fixes η(−+++)=diag⁡(−1,1,1,1), gives a symmetric tempered Hμ, and states that Hμ=Wμ on strictly positive-time differences and agrees with both ordered Wightman kernels on spacelike-separated supports (Tempered time-ordered scalar two-point carrier). This is its actual current interface, not an accepted proof stamp.

[F2]

The smeared-free-scalar carrier defines the relative-coordinate distribution Wμ(z)=∫Hμ+e−ip∘z dνμ(p); its translation-invariant bidistribution is the shell integral of e−ip∘xeip∘y, and on product tests it equals ⟨Ω,Φμ(f)Φμ(g)Ω⟩2=⟨Kμf‾,Kμg⟩2, with second-variable-linear pairing (Smeared free scalar field and its Poincare representation).

[F3]

The scalar-causal-commutator carrier states [ Φμ(f),Φμ(g) ]=−iΔμ(f,g)I for real compact tests and supp⁡Δμ⊆{(t,x):t2−∣x∣2≥0} (Causal support of the scalar commutator distribution).

[F4]

The lift of a relative distribution is ⟨K~,Ψ⟩=⟨K,z↦∫Ψ(y+z,y) dy⟩. The formal TnH coefficients use these lifts in independent-variable contractions (Regular time-ordered contraction coefficients).

[F5]

The regular star product is the finite contraction formula for any continuous bidistribution and regular polynomial inputs (Regular Wick-star contractions are well defined and associative).

[F6]

Finite sums of product tests are dense in the smooth compact kernel topology (Tensor-product tests are dense in smooth compact kernel topology).

[F7]

Every open cover admits a locally finite smooth partition of unity with compact supports subordinate to cover members (Test function cutoffs and euclidean localization).

[F8]

Tensor products of distributions exist, their supports are products of the factor supports, and iterated pairings associate (Tensor product distributions and iterated pairings).

Proof

Given: [A1] and [F1]–[F8], with each draft supplier used only at its inspected statement and proof status.

1.1F2F3F4F6algebra

Taking vacuum expectations in the commutator of [F3] and using the covariance in [F2] gives Wμ(f,g)−Wμ(g,f)=−iΔμ(f,g) for real compact tests. Complex bilinearity extends this equality to complex product tests, and density [F6] extends it to the lifted bidistributions: W~μ−W~μT=−iΔ~μ. If Ψ is supported where x−y is spacelike, the relative test z↦∫Ψ(y+z,y) dy is compactly supported in the spacelike open set. By [F3] its pairing with Δμ is zero. Thus W~μ−W~μT vanishes there. The conclusion is conditional on the current QFT-MF02 statements.

2.1F1F2F4F7step 1.1construct

Put C=A−B. Every z=x−y∈C either has z0>0 or is spacelike: if z0≤0 and it is not spacelike, then z∈C−, excluded by A≽outB; this also excludes the zero difference. Thus C lies in the open set Ω=U+∪Usp, where U+={z:z0>0} and Usp={z:(z0)2−∣z∣2<0}. By [F7], the cover {U+,Usp} of Ω has a locally finite smooth partition of unity subordinate to these sets. Any compactly supported relative test in Ω meets only finitely many partition functions. On each U+ piece [F1] gives Hμ=Wμ; on each Usp piece [F1] gives agreement with both Wightman orderings, which coincide there by step 1.1. Therefore H~μ−W~μ vanishes on Ω. The open set O={(x,y):x−y∈Ω} contains A×B, and the lift [F4] sends every test supported in O to a relative test supported in Ω. Hence H~μ−W~μ vanishes on an open neighborhood of A×B.

3.1F4F8step 2.1algebra

For any finite number r of cross pairs, expand H~μ⊗r−W~μ⊗r by telescoping; each summand contains one factor H~μ−W~μ. Its support is disjoint from the corresponding open neighborhood of A×B by [F8] and step 2.1, so it pairs to zero with derivative-kernel tests supported in (A×B)r. Therefore every finite cross contraction is unchanged when the time-ordered kernel is replaced by Wμ.

4.1F4F5F8step 3.1algebra

In the finite contraction formula for Tp+qH(V,…,V⏟p inputs,U,…,U⏟q inputs), split ∑i<jDHij into contractions within the first p slots, within the last q slots, and between the two blocks. Two such operators may share a field block, but they contract distinct variable copies. If they share block i, symmetry of its coefficient kernel lets one exchange the labels of the two contracted variables; the tensor-product pairings then agree in either order by [F8]. Thus the within-first, within-last, and cross-block sums commute. Their first two exponentials give TpH(V,…,V) and TqH(U,…,U). By the finite product rule on the block coefficients, the r-th term of the cross-block exponential is ηr/r! times the independent r-pair contraction of the r-th derivative kernels of these two block outputs. After replacing the cross kernels by Wμ using step 3.1, this is exactly the finite star-product formula [F5]. Every remaining field variable comes from an original coefficient kernel, so within-block contractions retain support in A or B. Hence Tp+qH(V,…,V⏟p inputs,U,…,U⏟q inputs)=TpH(V,…,V)⋆WμTqH(U,…,U). For p=0 or q=0, the empty block is T0H=1 and the same identity follows directly.

5.1A1F4step 4.1algebra

In the degree-n coefficient of SzH(V+U), symmetry of TnH groups terms with p copies of V and q copies of U, p+q=n, with factor (np). Dividing by n! gives 1/(p!q!). Substitution of step 4.1 therefore gives exactly the degree-n coefficient of SzH(V)⋆WμSzH(U). Since n was arbitrary, the causal-factorization identity holds coefficientwise, with no convergence in z.

6.1F5step 1.1algebra∎

If A,B are pairwise spacelike separated, step 1.1 gives W~μ=W~μT on A×B. Swapping the two inputs in the finite ⋆Wμ formula reverses each cross pairing and changes no within-input term, so F⋆WμG=G⋆WμF. Applying this coefficientwise to the formal series proves their commutation.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources