Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Gap-controlled correlation resolvent and positive coefficients

Statement

Assume the finite GNS detailed-balance hypotheses, d>1, and the positive gap γ of Faithful scalar-kernel detailed balance gives a relaxation gap. For centered A,B∈M0, define CA,B(t):=⟨etGA,B⟩σ. Then

∣CA,B(t)∣≤e−γt∥A∥σ∥B∥σ,t≥0,

so the correlation is absolutely integrable and

∫0∞CA,B(t) dt=⟨(−G∣M0)−1A,B⟩σ.

For centered A, the real coefficient

Γ(A):=Re⁡∫0∞⟨etGA,A⟩σ dt

is nonnegative. Its real polarization on any finite list of Hermitian centered observables is a positive-semidefinite real symmetric correlation-integral matrix. No mixing, central-limit theorem, or infinite-volume transport claim follows.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The finite observable generator G=K+D, the faithful state σ, the centered subspace M0, and the gap γ>0.

[F1]

Faithful scalar-kernel detailed balance gives a relaxation gap: M0 is invariant, ∥etGA∥σ≤e−γt∥A∥σ for centered A, and D∣M0≤−γI.

[F2]

Specified finite GNS detailed balance: G=K+D, D is self-adjoint for ⟨⋅,⋅⟩σ, and K is anti-self-adjoint.

Proof

1.1givenF1algebra

Cauchy–Schwarz in the finite weighted inner product and [F1] give ∣CA,B(t)∣≤e−γt∥A∥σ∥B∥σ. The right side is integrable on [0,∞), so the correlation integral converges absolutely.

1.2givenF1algebra

The integral Y:=∫0∞etGA dt converges in the finite-dimensional invariant space M0. Since ddtetGA=G(etGA) and the decay in [F1] sends the endpoint to zero, integrating gives G(Y)=−A. If GZ=0 for centered Z, then [F1] gives ∥Z∥σ=∥etGZ∥σ≤e−γt∥Z∥σ, hence Z=0. Thus −G∣M0 is invertible and Y=(−G∣M0)−1A, which proves the resolvent identity.

2.1F1F2step 1.2algebra∎

For Y from step 1.2, Γ(A)=Re⁡⟨Y,−G(Y)⟩σ. The term Re⁡⟨Y,−K(Y)⟩σ vanishes because K is anti-self-adjoint. The remaining term is ⟨Y,−D(Y)⟩σ≥γ∥Y∥σ2≥0 by [F1]–[F2]. Therefore Γ is a nonnegative real quadratic form on the real vector space of Hermitian centered observables; real polarization gives a positive-semidefinite symmetric matrix.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources