Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Translation-invariant Ising Majorana symbol and bulk gap

Statement

Assume Countable Choice. Let h,J∈R be energies in joules, with the convention of the open-chain definition: the field coefficient is h and the adjacent-site bond coefficient is J, with no bond joining the final site to the first. On K=ℓ2(Z;C2), write xj=(uj,vj) and define the everywhere-defined complex-linear operator A∞:K→K by (A∞x)j=(2hvj−2Jvj−1, −2huj+2Juj+1),K∞=iA∞. For any bounded operator T on the Hilbert space K, let T∗ denote its Hilbert adjoint. Use the Fourier unitary Fx(k)=∑jxjeijk on T=R/(2πZ) with normalized measure. Define the continuous matrix symbol M(k)=(02i(h−Jeik)−2i(h−Je−ik)0), whose eigenvalues are ±ϵ(k), where ϵ(k)=2h2+J2−2hJcos⁡k. For a 2×2 matrix C acting on the defined C2, write ∥C∥op:=sup⁡{∥Cv∥C2:∥v∥C2=1}. Then ∥M(k)∥op=2∣h−Jeik∣≤2(∣h∣+∣J∣). Define M:L2(T;C2)→L2(T;C2) by (Mf)(k)=M(k)f(k) almost everywhere. This is an everywhere-defined bounded multiplication operator, and FK∞F−1=M. By the stated resolvent convention, λ∈σ(K∞) exactly when λIK−K∞ has no bounded everywhere-defined two-sided inverse on K. Its spectrum is exactly ⋃k∈T{−ϵ(k),ϵ(k)}. The nonnegative band is ϵ(T), whose minimum is Δbulk=min⁡kϵ(k)=2∣∣h∣−∣J∣∣, so this one-particle band closes exactly when ∣h∣=∣J∣. This statement does not assert uniqueness of an infinite spin-chain ground state or a thermodynamic-limit singularity.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice; real h,J in joules; and the finite-chain coefficient convention.

[A1]

Countable Choice is assumed for the Fourier-unitarity and Hilbert-adjoint suppliers (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[F1]

Open transverse Ising chain and ordered Majorana operators and Exact quadratic reduction and Gibbs trace of the open Ising chain: the field and bond coefficients are h and J, and the open-chain Majorana coefficient entries are 2h and 2J on the two alternating diagonals.

[F2]

Unitary Fourier transform for a two-component lattice sequence: with normalized measure dk/(2π), Fx(k)=∑jxjeijk extends to a unitary from ℓ2(Z;C2) onto L2(T;C2).

[F3]

Unitary Fourier transform for a two-component lattice sequence defines K with norm ∥x∥2=∑j∥xj∥C22 and inner product ∑j⟨xj,yj⟩C2; the scalar square-summable-family definition supplies the coordinate sums. Reindexing preserves these sums, so each finite shift has norm one.

[F4]

A bounded linear operator between normed spaces: a linear map is bounded when ∥Tx∥≤C∥x∥ for one finite constant C and all x.

[F5]

Resolvent and spectrum of an unbounded operator: λ is in the resolvent set when λI−T is bijective and its inverse is bounded everywhere; the spectrum is its complement.

[F6]

The Hilbert-space adjoint of a bounded operator: under Countable Choice, the bounded Hilbert-space adjoint T∗ is the unique map satisfying ⟨Tx,y⟩=⟨x,T∗y⟩ for every x,y.

[F7]

The one-dimensional torus and its normalized Haar integral: its quotient R/Z is compact and its normalized measure is m(E)=λ1(q−1[E]∩[0,1)). Under the homeomorphism [x]↦[2πx] to the angle torus, a Borel arc of angular length 2δ with 0<δ<π has measure 2δ/(2π)=δ/π>0.

Proof

1.1givenA1F1F2F3F4F6algebra

Let S+f have coordinates (S+f)j=fj+1 and let S−f have (S−f)j=fj−1. Reindexing gives ∥S±f∥=∥f∥ and ⟨S−f,g⟩=⟨f,S+g⟩, so S−∗=S+ and S+∗=S− by [F6]. The Fourier-unitarity fact [F2] makes K a Hilbert space, so the bounded shifts and their bounded linear combinations have Hilbert adjoints under [F6]. With B=2hI−2JS−, B∗=2hI−2JS+; the block formula A∞=(0B−B∗0) then gives A∞∗=−A∞. By [F3] and the triangle inequality, both B and B∗ have bound 2(∣h∣+∣J∣), whence ∥A∞x∥2=∥Bv∥2+∥B∗u∥2≤4(∣h∣+∣J∣)2∥x∥2. Thus A∞ and K∞=iA∞ are everywhere-defined bounded operators by [F4]. Finally ⟨iA∞x,y⟩=i⟨x,A∞∗y⟩=⟨x,−iA∞∗y⟩, so K∞∗=−iA∞∗=iA∞=K∞ by [F6].

2.1A1F2step 1.1algebra

For a finitely supported sequence, F(vj−1)(k)=eikv^(k) and F(uj+1)(k)=e−iku^(k) by reindexing the sums. Therefore FA∞F−1 is multiplication by (02(h−Jeik)−2(h−Je−ik)0); boundedness and density extend the identity to all of ℓ2. Multiplication by i gives the displayed M(k).

3.1step 2.1algebra

Put a(k)=2i(h−Jeik). Then M(k)=(0a(k)a(k)‾0) and M(k)2=∣a(k)∣2I. Its characteristic polynomial is λ2−∣a(k)∣2, so its two eigenvalues are ±∣a(k)∣=±2h2+J2−2hJcos⁡k, including the double zero when a(k)=0.

4.1A1F2F4F5F7step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1algebra

Let λ∈C lie outside the union of the two bands in the Statement. By step 3.1, ϵ(k)=∣a(k)∣ for every k, so d(k):=∣λ2−∣a(k)∣2∣ is continuous and strictly positive on T. For each k0, the open set Uk0:={k:d(k)>d(k0)/2} contains k0. Compactness from [F7] supplies a finite subcover Uk1,…,Ukm, whence d(k)>c:=min⁡1≤r≤md(kr)/2>0 for every k. The matrix identity (M(k)−λI)(M(k)+λI)=(∣a(k)∣2−λ2)I therefore gives the pointwise inverse (M(k)+λI)/(∣a(k)∣2−λ2). This inverse matrix field is continuous and its operator norm is uniformly bounded because ∥M(k)∥op≤2(∣h∣+∣J∣) and d(k)≥c. Multiplication by it is an everywhere-defined bounded two-sided inverse for M−λI, and its negative is an inverse for λI−M. Conjugating by F puts λ in the resolvent of K∞ by [F5]. Thus the spectrum is contained in the two bands.

4.2A1F2F5F7step 2.1step 3.1algebra

Fix k0∈T. When a(k0)≠0, the vectors w+=(a(k0)/∣a(k0)∣,1)/2 and w−=(−a(k0)/∣a(k0)∣,1)/2 are unit eigenvectors of M(k0) with eigenvalues ±ϵ(k0) by step 3.1; when a(k0)=0, M(k0)=0 and either standard unit vector is an eigenvector. For either eigenvalue λ, set δn=min⁡(π/2,1/n) and let In={k0+[t]:−δn<t<δn}, an open arc of angular length 2δn and measure mT(In)=δn/π>0 by [F7]. Put ψn(k)=1In(k)w/mT(In) using the corresponding fixed eigenvector w. Then ∥ψn∥2=1 and continuity of M gives ∥(M−λI)ψn∥2≤sup⁡k∈In∥(M(k)−M(k0))w∥→0. If M−λI had a bounded inverse, these unit vectors would have residual norms bounded below by the reciprocal inverse norm, a contradiction. By [F5] and the unitary equivalence in step 2.1, every band value lies in the spectrum of K∞.

5.1step 3.1step 4.1step 4.2algebra∎

Steps 4.1 and 4.2 give both inclusions, so the spectrum is exactly ⋃k∈T{−ϵ(k),ϵ(k)}. Since cos⁡k∈[−1,1], step 3.1 gives min⁡kϵ(k)2=4(h2+J2−2∣hJ∣)=4(∣h∣−∣J∣)2. The minimum is attained at k=0 when hJ≥0 and at k=π when hJ<0. Taking the nonnegative square root gives Δbulk=2∣∣h∣−∣J∣∣, which vanishes exactly for ∣h∣=∣J∣. This concerns the one-particle convolution operator only.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources