Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Exact quadratic reduction and Gibbs trace of the open Ising chain

Statement

Assume Countable Choice. Let N≥1, use the open-chain Hilbert space and Hamiltonian HN(h,J) of the ordered Majorana definition, and let β>0 have units J−1 while h,J have units joules. Define the real skew matrix AN∈M2N(R) by (AN)2j−1,2j=2h for 1≤j≤N, (AN)2j,2j+1=2J for 1≤j<N, the opposite entries by skew-symmetry, and all other entries by zero. Let ϵ1,…,ϵN≥0 be its real orthogonal block energies, including zero values. Then HN(h,J)=i4γTANγ=∑r=1Nϵr(br∗br−12I) for the transformed Majorana modes br in the Proof, and its finite Gibbs trace is ZN(β;h,J):=Tr⁡HN(e−βHN(h,J))=∏r=1N2cosh⁡ ⁣(βϵr2). Every zero mode contributes a factor two. The chain is open throughout; no periodic Jordan–Wigner parity boundary term is included.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice; an integer N≥1; real h,J in joules; and β>0 in J−1.

[A1]

Countable Choice is assumed exactly where the diagonal occupation-trace supplier is applied (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[F1]

Open transverse Ising chain and ordered Majorana operators: HN=(C2)⊗N, HN=−h∑j=1NZj−J∑j=1N−1XjXj+1, and γ2j−1=Z1⋯Zj−1Xj, γ2j=Z1⋯Zj−1Yj.

[F2]

Hermiticity and CAR of the ordered Ising Majoranas: each γa is Hermitian and {γa,γb}=2δabI.

[F3]

Orthogonal normal form of a finite real skew matrix: a real skew matrix of size 2N has an orthogonal basis of two-dimensional blocks (0ϵr−ϵr0) with ϵr≥0.

[F4]

Explicit diagonal Fock domains and occupation trace: under Countable Choice, for a finite fermionic mode set with energies ϵr, β>0, and qr=e−βϵr>0, the diagonal occupation trace is ∏r(1+qr); its finite-mode case allows zero energies and hence qr=1.

[F5]

Finite matrix spectral and state calculus: finite Hermitian matrices have orthonormal eigenbases, and the ordinary finite trace is basis-independent.

Proof

1.1givenF1F2algebra

For every site, γ2j−1γ2j=XjYj=iZj, so ihγ2j−1γ2j=−hZj. For j<N, γ2jγ2j+1=YjZjXj+1=iXjXj+1, so iJγ2jγ2j+1=−JXjXj+1. Summing exactly these terms gives the open-chain HN of [F1], with no j=N bond.

2.1step 1.1F2algebra

For any paired indices a<b with coefficient c, setting (AN)ab=2c and (AN)ba=−2c contributes (i/4)(2cγaγb−2cγbγa)=icγaγb by [F2]. Applying this to c=h on (2j−1,2j) and c=J on (2j,2j+1) yields HN=(i/4)γTANγ.

3.1givenF2F3step 2.1algebra

By [F3], choose a real orthogonal O with OANOT in the displayed 2×2 blocks, and put η=Oγ. Since O is real and orthogonal, [F2] gives {ηa,ηb}=2δabI. Define br=(η2r−1+iη2r)/2. Direct expansion using these anticommutators gives {br,bs∗}=δrsI, {br,bs}=0, and br∗br=12I+i2η2r−1η2r. Using the matrix expression from step 2.1, substitution into the block expression gives HN=∑rϵr(br∗br−12I).

4.1step 3.1F5algebra

The projections nr=br∗br commute by the CAR in step 3.1 and are simultaneously diagonalizable: diagonalize n1 using [F5], restrict the remaining commuting Hermitian matrices to its invariant eigenspaces, and continue through the finite list. Their joint eigenvalues lie in {0,1}N. If a joint eigenspace has occupancy 0 in coordinate r, br∗ maps it isometrically into the eigenspace with that bit changed to 1, since ∥br∗ψ∥2=⟨ψ,(I−nr)ψ⟩=∥ψ∥2; when the bit is 1, br is the inverse isometry. Hence all 2N joint eigenspaces have the same positive dimension. Their orthogonal sum is HN, whose dimension is 2N, so each eigenspace is one-dimensional. The resulting ordered occupation basis identifies the br representation unitarily with the finite fermionic Fock occupation basis.

5.1A1F4F5step 3.1step 4.1algebra∎

In that occupation basis, ∑rϵrbr∗br is the diagonal finite-mode Hamiltonian with energies ϵr. Apply [F4] with mode set {1,…,N}, chemical potential 0, and qr=e−βϵr to obtain trace ∏r(1+e−βϵr). The scalar shift −12∑rϵrI multiplies this trace by eβ∑rϵr/2, and [F5] permits the unitary change back to HN. Thus ZN=∏r(eβϵr/2+e−βϵr/2)=∏r2cosh⁡(βϵr/2). If ϵr=0, its factor is 2.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources