How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
by Wallis's product
Statement
.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Positive integers tending to infinity.
For and , (Gautschi's inequality for the real Gamma function).
For naturals , ( for ; hence , the quotient is a natural number, and ).
For every , (The real Gamma functional equation ).
Proof
Iterating [F4] gives , with the empty product valid at .
Apply [F1] with and . After inversion, , so this middle sequence tends to .
By step 1.1 and [F3], the middle sequence is . Fact [F2] makes its limit , while step 1.2 makes the same limit .
Positivity of Gamma and uniqueness of limits therefore give .
Remarks
This proof uses Gautschi and Wallis. The Gaussian-integral proof from the Gaussian integral is logically independent of it.
Depends on
The real Gamma functional equation
Gautschi's inequality for the real Gamma function
The central binomial coefficient is asymptotic to 4^n divided by the square root of pi n
for ; hence , the quotient is a natural number, and
Algebra of limits: sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients
Square roots exist: a unique with ; the positives are