Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedverified 2026-10-15 (gpt-6-luna, gpt-6.1-sol, and delegated Codex review/repair agents; see completed run evidence)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Regular first-class constraints admit local symplectic reduction

Physical scope

Local differential-geometric quotient only; no global Hausdorff quotient or global gauge-fixing assertion.

Statement

Let (P2n,ω) be symplectic, and let N={χ1=⋯=χr=0} be a regular embedded level surface with {χa,χb}=0 on N. Then ker⁡(ω∣N) is exactly the rank-r distribution spanned by the restricted Hamiltonian vector fields Xχa. This distribution is involutive. Around every point of N, its leaves admit smooth Frobenius coordinates (s1,…,sr,y1,…,y2n−2r), and the local leaf space has a unique smooth closed nondegenerate two-form ωred whose pullback is ω∣N. Thus regular first-class constraints yield a local symplectic quotient. No global orbit-space regularity follows from these hypotheses.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A 2n-dimensional symplectic manifold, a regular common level N, and constraints whose mutual brackets vanish on N.

[A1]

The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω): assume countable choice ACω, the exact choice strength used by the cotangent smooth-structure supplier; no full axiom of choice is assumed.

[F1]

Regular primary constraints and total generator: TzN=∩aker⁡dχa(z).

[F2]

Symplectic form and symplectic manifold: ω is a smooth closed nondegenerate two-form.

[F3]

Symplectic orthogonal complement: Wω={v:ω(v,w)=0 for all w∈W}, equivalently the inverse image of the annihilator under ω♭.

[F4]

Symplectic double-orthogonal and dimension identities: for each tangent subspace W, dim⁡W+dim⁡Wω=dim⁡P.

[F5]

Smooth dependence of ODE solutions on parameters: smooth linear ODEs have unique local solutions smoothly dependent on parameters.

[F6]

Frobenius local coordinate theorem: a smooth involutive rank-r distribution has local coordinates in which leaves are the s-coordinate slices with y constant.

[F7]

Poisson bracket on a symplectic manifold defines {F,G}=dF(XG)=XG(F) on any symplectic manifold, with ιXHω=dH. Nondegeneracy makes XH unique, and inversion of the smooth nonsingular local matrix of ω makes it smooth. This agrees with the cotangent convention in Canonical Poisson brackets and local Hamiltonian flow.

Proof

1.1givenA1F1F2F3F4F7algebra

For w∈TzN, [F1] gives dχa(w)=0, hence ω(Xχa,w)=0 and each Xχa∈(TzN)ω. The dχa are independent, so their images under the isomorphism ω♭ are independent; therefore these r vectors are independent. The level has codimension r, and [F4] gives dim⁡(TzN)ω=r, so they span the symplectic orthogonal.

2.1givenF1F2F3F7step 1.1algebra

On N, dχb(Xχa)={χb,χa}=0 by first-classness and [F7], so each Xχa is tangent. Their independence from step 1.1 implies r≤dim⁡N=2n−r, hence r≤n. The radical of the restricted form is TzN∩(TzN)ω; since the orthogonal is already spanned by tangent Xχa, this intersection is exactly that span.

3.1givenF2step 2.1algebra

For smooth kernel fields U,V and any tangent field W, apply dωN=0 to (U,V,W). All terms containing contractions with U or V vanish, leaving ωN([U,V],W)=0. Thus ([U,V]) is again in the kernel and the distribution is involutive.

4.1givenF5F6step 3.1

The Frobenius frame proof solves a transverse linear matrix ODE to straighten a local frame. Its coefficients are smooth, so [F5] gives a smooth local solution in transverse coordinates; the initial matrix is identity, so its determinant remains nonzero after shrinking the coordinate neighborhood. The resulting frame is involutive and [F6] supplies local (s,y) coordinates. This explicitly supplies the parameter dependence needed in that construction.

5.1step 2.1step 4.1algebra

Since every ωN-kernel vector is tangent to the s-leaves, the contraction of ωN with ∂sa vanishes. Therefore its coordinate expression has no dsa factor.

6.1givenF2step 4.1step 5.1algebra∎

In the Frobenius chart, step 5.1 writes ωN=12∑i,jωij(s,y) dyi∧dyj. Since dωN=0, the coefficient of each independent form dsa∧dyi∧dyj with i<j is ∂saωij=0. If the y-space has dimension less than two, the displayed two-form is zero and is already independent of s. Thus the coefficients define a form ωred on the local y-space, and the coordinate projection pulls it back to ωN; the remaining dy-components of dωN=0 show dωred=0. Its kernel would lift to a vector in TN orthogonal to all of TN, hence to the already-quotiented kernel, so ωred is nondegenerate.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources