How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Positive classical spin Poincare orbit and stabilizer jump
Statement
Assume . Let act coadjointly on the dual charge space of Poincare semidirect group, dual pairing and moment components. At a charge point , define , , and . Let be the totally antisymmetric Minkowski volume tensor with ; raising all indices with gives . Define the algebraic vector , and write and . For fixed mass in kg, angular-momentum parameter in kg m/s, and in m/s, take the rest charge point with and , all other independent components of being zero. Its coadjoint orbit is an eight-dimensional smooth symplectic manifold with its KKS form. On this orbit, , is future, , and . The exact joint invariant set with these values is this one orbit. At the rest stabilizer has dimension four and the spinless orbit has dimension six; no smoothness claim is made for a larger union of Casimir level sets.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The proper orthochronous Poincaré group and charge pairing, , , and the rest representative in the statement.
The Axiom of Countable Choice (): assume countable choice only; no full axiom of choice is used.
Poincare semidirect group, dual pairing and moment components: the Poincaré group is a ten-dimensional Lie group with semidirect bracket and dual translation/antisymmetric Lorentz charges ; here and are lowered with .
Poincare cotangent moment map and full generator algebra: the current assigned A draft states the affine coadjoint action (P,J)->(Lambda P,Lambda J Lambda^T+a wedge Lambda P) and the charge map with the exp(-s xi) convention. The carrier exists as this batch-26 draft, but its H0/H8 inputs and proof review remain unresolved.
Coadjoint orbits are symplectic manifolds: under , every coadjoint orbit has the canonical smooth homogeneous-space structure and the KKS form is smooth, closed, nondegenerate, with .
Proof
Given: The rest covector and exact coadjoint action conditional on [L1].
In the rest frame , the spatial components of are the three independent duals of , multiplied by the nonzero factor . Thus and , so and . Under translations, changes by ; inserting this into adds an epsilon contraction with two copies of , which vanishes by antisymmetry. Lorentz covariance of under and the charge action [L1] preserve these scalar identities over the orbit.
A stabilizer element must fix , so its Lorentz part is a spatial rotation. Preserving the nonzero spin vector leaves exactly the rotations about that axis, of dimension one. In the coadjoint action, preserving then forces the spatial translation part to vanish, while translations parallel to remain free, giving one further dimension. The stabilizer has dimension two, and since by [F1], the orbit dimension is eight.
Any future timelike with can be sent to rest by a proper orthochronous Lorentz transformation. In that frame, choose the translation part to remove the three components; the remaining spatial spin vector has norm by step 1.1, and a spatial rotation sends it to the specified axis. Therefore every pair with the stated invariants lies in the rest representative's orbit; the converse follows from step 1.1.
Applying [F2] to this orbit gives its canonical smooth homogeneous-space structure and nondegenerate closed KKS two-form. If , the stabilizer instead contains all three spatial rotations and the one translation parallel to , hence has dimension four and its orbit dimension is . This establishes the stabilizer jump without asserting regularity of any ambient Casimir locus.
Depends on
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Sources
- Nesta van der Schaaf, Classical and Quantum Particles in Galilean and Poincaré Spacetime, complete 2017 monograph PDF; §9.3 PDF pp. 77–79; §10.2.2 PDF pp. 81–82.
- Jerrold E. Marsden and Tudor S. Ratiu, Introduction to Mechanics and Symmetry, 2nd ed., complete book PDF; §12.1 Theorem 12.1.4 pp. 393–395; §12.4 Theorem 12.4.1 pp. 412–413; §§14.2–14.3 pp. 466–473; §7.9 pp. 208–211.