Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedverified 2026-10-15 (gpt-6-luna, gpt-6.1-sol, and delegated Codex review/repair agents; see completed run evidence)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Massive spinless shell reduction is a single KKS orbit

Statement

Assume ACω. Fix mass m>0 in kg and c>0 in m/s. For a charge point (Pa,Jab), lower indices by Pb:=ηbaPa and Jcd:=ηceηdfJef, and define P2:=ηabPaPb. Let εabcd be the totally antisymmetric Minkowski volume tensor with ε0123=+1; raising all indices with η=diag⁡(−1,1,1,1) gives ε0123=−1. Let Σm+ be the future mass shell in flat Minkowski cotangent space and quotient its complete characteristic lines as in the current draft H8 supplier. The resulting global phase space has coordinates (ai,pi)∈R6 and form dai∧dpi. Under the charge map of Poincare cotangent moment map and full generator algebra, it is globally symplectomorphic to the single coadjoint orbit through (P=(mc,0),J=0). Its image is exactly the future massive charge pairs with P2=−m2c2 and W=0, where Wa=12εabcdPbJcd. This statement identifies one smooth orbit; it makes no regularity claim about a union of Casimir level sets.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: m>0, signature (−,+,+,+), the totally antisymmetric volume tensor with ε0123=+1 and ε0123=−1, and the exact global shell quotient.

[A1]

The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω): assume countable choice ACω only; no full axiom of choice is used.

[F1]

Poincare semidirect group, dual pairing and moment components: Pa=ηabpb, Jab=xaPb−xbPa, and the affine cotangent charge pairing is fixed by exp⁡(−sξ); on charge space use Pb=ηbaPa and Jcd=ηceηdfJef.

[L1]

Poincare cotangent moment map and full generator algebra: the current assigned A draft defines the same coadjoint charge map and action used here. The carrier exists as a batch-26 draft; its own H0/H8 prerequisites and proof status remain unresolved.

[L2]

Flat future mass shell has an explicit global orbit quotient: the current H8 draft gives the complete future-shell quotient by characteristic lines, global (a,p) coordinates, reduced form dai∧dpi, and fixed-time slices; its dependencies match the H25 manifest. The H25 Step 1 record is ready/hash-current, but the carrier remains a draft without pipeline_run binding or independent proof approval.

[F2]

Coadjoint orbits are symplectic manifolds: a coadjoint orbit has canonical homogeneous-space smooth structure and KKS form ωβ(ξO,ηO)=β([ξ,η]), with moment equation dμξ=−ιξOω.

Proof

technique · explicit global charge coordinates and KKS uniqueness

Given: The positive mass shell, actual H8 and H10 draft interfaces [L1]–[L2], and the inspected KKS theorem [F2].

1.1F1L1algebra

In a rest frame P=(mc,0), W=0 is equivalent to Jij=0, since its three spatial components are an invertible multiple of the three spatial angular-momentum components. The remaining J0i are produced explicitly by x0=0, xi=−J0i/(mc), since J=x∧P then has exactly those components and Jij=0. Lorentz transforming this representative gives a position representative for every future timelike P with W=0. Equivalently for a transverse representative x⋅P=0, xa=JabPb/P2, as substitution of J=x∧P gives JabPb=xaP2−(x⋅P)Pa. This characterization is Lorentz covariant.

2.1L1L2step 1.1algebra

H8's quotient point (a,p) maps to P0=E/c, Pi=pi, J0i=−aiP0, and Jij=aipj−ajpi. The inverse is pi=Pi, ai=−J0i/P0, smooth since P0>0. These mutually inverse smooth coordinates make the image an embedded six-dimensional graph and show the quotient map is a diffeomorphism onto the charge locus of step 1.1.

3.1F1L1step 1.1step 2.1algebra

A proper orthochronous boost sends each future massive P to rest. By step 1.1 its W=0 charge then has only J0i components, and a translation removes those components. Thus every pair in the locus is in the orbit of (mc,0;0); conversely P2 and W=0 are invariant under the coadjoint action. The stabilizer at rest consists of spatial rotations and translations parallel to P, dimension 3+1=4, so the orbit dimension is 10−4=6. The six smooth orbit coordinates pi=Pi, ai=−J0i/P0 from step 2.1 have injective differential: if their differentials vanish, the graph formulas in step 2.1 make every component of (P,J) have zero differential, and the coadjoint-orbit inclusion is an immersion. Since both manifolds have dimension six, the inverse function theorem makes this coordinate map a local diffeomorphism. The bijection in step 2.1 is therefore a global diffeomorphism for the canonical orbit smooth structure.

4.1F2L1L2A1step 3.1∎

Let ρ:Σm+→Bm be the H8 quotient and ι:Σm+↪T∗R4 the inclusion. H8 states ρ∗ωred=ι∗ω. The cotangent action of g=(a,Λ) preserves this future shell: P′=ΛP preserves its norm and future cone, and it maps the full characteristic line (x+αP,p) to (Λx+a+αΛP,Λ−Tp), which is exactly a characteristic line with momentum P′. The inverse group element gives the converse. Therefore the quotient action is well-defined. It is smooth because the global section σ(ai,pi) given by x0=0, xi=ai is smooth and g⋅b=ρ(g⋅σ(b)) is its explicit expression; fibre preservation gives the group law independently of the chosen section. The cotangent action is symplectic by [L1], so pulling back along the surjective submersion ρ gives ρ∗(g∗ωred)=g∗ι∗ω=ι∗ω=ρ∗ωred, hence the quotient action preserves ωred. Differentiating ρ(exp⁡(−sξ)⋅z)=exp⁡(−sξ)⋅ρ(z) at s=0 gives dρ(ξΣm+)=ξBm with the library's same fundamental-field convention. The moment components from [L1] are constant on each characteristic fibre since P is fixed and (x+αP)∧P=x∧P. Thus for any tangent v on Bm choose a lift v~ and obtain dμˉξ(v)=dμξ(v~)=−ωred(ξBm,v). On the orbit [F2] gives the same moment equation. Its fundamental fields span each tangent space, so these equations determine both two-forms pointwise and show the diffeomorphism in step 3.1 pulls KKS back to ωred=dai∧dpi.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources