Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Unital star algebra and positive normalized state

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

Let A be the unital complex star algebra and let ω:A→C be the positive normalized state of Unital star algebra and positive normalized state: ω is complex-linear, ω(1A)=1, and ω(a∗a)≥0 for every a∈A. No norm or completion on A is assumed. The form B(a,b):=ω(b∗a) is Hermitian and positive semidefinite; its radical Nω:={a:ω(a∗a)=0} is a left ideal, and ∣ω(b∗a)∣2≤ω(a∗a)ω(b∗b) even when either factor on the right is zero (Positive-state Cauchy–Schwarz and left radical). Under Countable Choice, the quotient Dω:=A/Nω has a Hilbert completion Hω by The norm completion of an inner-product space is a Hilbert space. Left multiplication πω(a)[b]=[ab] gives a unital representation on the common invariant dense domain Dω; its adjoint satisfies Dω⊆D(πω(a)∗) and πω(a)∗∣Dω=πω(a∗), so the graph closure of each πω(a) is a graph. The vector Ωω=[1A] has norm one, πω(A)Ωω=Dω, and ω(a)=(πω(a)Ωω,Ωω). For any second unital *-representation ρ on a Hilbert space K with a common invariant dense domain D′, if (ρ(a)x,y)=(x,ρ(a∗)y), D′=ρ(A)Ω′, and ω(a)=(ρ(a)Ω′,Ω′), the GNS theorem gives a unique unitary carrying Ωω to Ω′ and intertwining the representations on their common domains (GNS Hilbert reconstruction with invariant operator domain). Let G be a group with a topology making multiplication and inversion continuous, and let α:G→Aut⁡∗(A) be an action (αe=id, αgαh=αgh) by bijective complex-linear maps preserving product, unit and involution, with ω∘αg=ω. Then Ug[a]=[αg(a)] extends to a unitary representation; if every function g↦ω(b∗αg(a)) is continuous at the identity, every orbit map g↦Ugξ is norm-continuous (State-preserving symmetries implemented unitarily). When a=a∗, πω(a) is symmetric on Dω, but this construction does not establish that its closure is self-adjoint.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, postulates, theorems and proofs

DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicableverified 2026-10-15 (gpt-6-luna, gpt-6.1-sol, and delegated Codex review/repair agents; see completed run evidence)Open item page →

Unital star algebra and positive normalized state

Definition

A unital complex star algebra is a complex vector space A with a complex-bilinear associative product (a,b)↦ab, a specified unit 1A, and a conjugate-linear map a↦a∗ such that, for all a,b∈A,

(ab)∗=b∗a∗,(a∗)∗=a,1A∗=1A.

A positive normalized state on A is a complex-linear functional ω:A→C such that ω(1A)=1 and ω(a∗a) is a real nonnegative number for every a∈A. This is an algebraic definition: no norm, topology, boundedness condition, or completion is part of the data.

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passverified 2026-10-15 (gpt-6-luna, gpt-6.1-sol, and delegated Codex review/repair agents; see completed run evidence)Open item page →

Positive-state Cauchy–Schwarz and left radical

Form conventions

A sesquilinear form B:A×A→C is taken to be linear in its first variable and conjugate-linear in its second. It is Hermitian when B(a,b)=B(b,a)‾ for all a,b∈A, positive semidefinite when B(a,a)∈[0,∞) for every a∈A, and has radical

rad⁡B:={a∈A:B(a,b)=0 for every b∈A}.

For a Hermitian form this left radical also equals {a∈A:B(b,a)=0 for every b∈A}.

Statement

Let A be a unital complex star algebra and let ω be a positive normalized state on A (Unital star algebra and positive normalized state). Define q(a):=ω(a∗a) and Nω:={a∈A:q(a)=0}. Then

∣ω(b∗a)∣2≤q(a)q(b)(a,b∈A).

The form (a,b)ω:=ω(b∗a) is Hermitian and positive semidefinite, Nω is its radical and a complex linear subspace, and Nω is a left ideal: ca∈Nω whenever a∈Nω and c∈A.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A unital complex star algebra A and a positive normalized state ω:A→C.

[F1]

Unital star algebra and positive normalized state: multiplication is complex-bilinear and associative, (ab)∗=b∗a∗, and ω is complex-linear with ω(1A)=1 and real nonnegative ω(a∗a) for every a∈A.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1givenF1algebra

Put X:=ω(a∗b) and Y:=ω(b∗a). Positivity makes both q(a+b)=q(a)+X+Y+q(b) and q(a+ib)=q(a)+iX−iY+q(b) real; their imaginary parts give Im⁡(X+Y)=0 and Re⁡(X−Y)=0, hence Y=X‾. Thus (a,b)ω=ω(b∗a) is Hermitian.

2.1givenF1step 1.1algebra

Suppose q(b)>0. For every z∈C, positivity and the star-algebra laws give 0≤q(a+zb)=q(a)+zX+z‾ X‾+∣z∣2q(b). Taking z=−X‾/q(b) yields 0≤q(a)−∣X∣2/q(b), so ∣ω(b∗a)∣2=∣Y∣2=∣X∣2≤q(a)q(b).

3.1givenF1step 1.1step 2.1algebra

Suppose q(b)=0. If X≠0, taking z=−tX‾ for real t>q(a)/(2∣X∣2) makes q(a+zb)=q(a)−2t∣X∣2<0, contradicting positivity. Hence X=Y=0, so the same Cauchy–Schwarz inequality holds when q(b)=0; if instead q(a)=0 and q(b)>0, step 2.1 forces Y=0 as well.

4.1F1step 2.1step 3.1algebra∎

If a∈Nω, steps 2.1 and 3.1 give (a,b)ω=0 for every b∈A; conversely (a,a)ω=0 means a∈Nω. Thus Nω is exactly the radical and is a linear subspace. For c∈A, set d:=c∗ca. Applying Cauchy–Schwarz to a,d gives ∣ω(d∗a)∣2≤q(a)q(d)=0, while d∗a=a∗c∗ca=(ca)∗(ca); therefore ca∈Nω.

TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passverified 2026-10-15 (gpt-6-luna, gpt-6.1-sol, and delegated Codex review/repair agents; see completed run evidence)Open item page →

GNS Hilbert reconstruction with invariant operator domain

Operator conventions

Let H be a complex Hilbert space with inner product linear in its first variable. An operator on H is a linear map T:D(T)→H whose domain D(T) is a linear subspace of H; it is densely defined when D(T) is dense in H. It is bounded when some C≥0 satisfies ∥Tx∥≤C∥x∥ for all x∈D(T), and unbounded when no such C exists. No boundedness of the operators πω(a) is assumed here.

For a complex vector space E, End⁡(E) denotes the set of complex-linear maps from E to itself. The product norm on H×H is ∥(x,y)∥×:=(∥x∥2+∥y∥2)1/2.

For a densely defined T, define its Hilbert-space adjoint by

D(T∗):={y∈H:there is z∈H such that (Tx,y)=(x,z) for every x∈D(T)},T∗y:=z.

The vector z is unique because D(T) is dense. The graph of T is G(T):={(x,Tx):x∈D(T)}⊆H×H. The operator T is symmetric when D(T)⊆D(T∗) and T∗x=Tx for every x∈D(T); it is self-adjoint when D(T)=D(T∗) and the same equality holds there. It is closable when the closure of G(T) in the product norm on H×H is the graph of an operator, denoted T‾. A symmetric operator is essentially self-adjoint when it is closable and T‾ is self-adjoint.

Statement

Let A be a complex vector space with a complex-bilinear associative product, unit 1A, and conjugate-linear involution satisfying (ab)∗=b∗a∗, (a∗)∗=a and 1A∗=1A. Let ω:A→C be complex-linear with ω(1A)=1 and real nonnegative ω(a∗a) for every a∈A. Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice ACω: every countable family of nonempty sets has a choice function. Put Nω:={a∈A:ω(a∗a)=0} and Dω:=A/Nω, with

([a],[b])ω:=ω(b∗a),

using the first-variable-linear convention. Let Hω be the Hilbert completion of this inner-product space, and identify Dω with its canonical dense image in Hω. For each a∈A define left multiplication on the common domain Dω by πω(a)[b]:=[ab]. Then πω is a unital algebra representation of A on the invariant dense domain Dω, and

Dω⊆D(πω(a)∗),πω(a)∗∣Dω=πω(a∗).

Each πω(a) is closable, meaning that the closure of its graph in Hω×Hω is the graph of an operator. The vector Ωω:=[1A] is a unit cyclic vector, πω(A)Ωω=Dω, and ω(a)=(πω(a)Ωω,Ωω). For uniqueness, let K be a Hilbert space, D′⊆K a dense linear subspace invariant under every operator ρ(a), and ρ:A→End⁡(D′) a unital algebra representation satisfying (ρ(a)x,y)=(x,ρ(a∗)y) for all a∈A and x,y∈D′. If Ω′∈D′, D′=ρ(A)Ω′, and ω(a)=(ρ(a)Ω′,Ω′), then there is a unique unitary V:Hω→K with VΩω=Ω′ and Vπω(a)x=ρ(a)Vx for all a∈A and x∈Dω. This theorem supplies neither a C*-norm nor essential self-adjointness of πω(a) when a=a∗.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A unital complex star algebra A, a positive normalized state ω, and Countable Choice ACω as stated above.

[F1]

Positive-state Cauchy–Schwarz and left radical: (a,b)ω=ω(b∗a) is a Hermitian positive semidefinite form, its radical is Nω={a∈A:(a,b)ω=0 for every b∈A}, and Nω is a left ideal; also ∣ω(b∗a)∣2≤ω(a∗a)ω(b∗b), including zero-norm cases.

[F2]

The norm completion of an inner-product space is a Hilbert space: assuming Countable Choice, the norm completion of a real or complex inner-product space has a unique extended inner product inducing the completion norm and is a Hilbert space. Its proof uses Countable Choice to select countably many approximants; no full Axiom of Choice is assumed here.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1given

By [F1], Nω is a subspace and every element of it pairs to zero with every element of A. Thus ([a],[b])ω=ω(b∗a) is independent of both representatives; it is Hermitian and nonnegative, and ([a],[a])ω=0 holds exactly when a∈Nω, so the quotient pairing is positive definite.

1.2F1givenalgebra

For a,b∈A, replacing b by b+n with n∈Nω changes ab by an∈Nω because Nω is a left ideal by [F1]; hence πω(a)[b]=[ab] is well defined. Bilinearity, associativity and 1A give πω(a+b)=πω(a)+πω(b), πω(λa)=λπω(a), πω(ab)=πω(a)πω(b) and πω(1A)=IDω, and left multiplication keeps Dω invariant.

2.1F2givenstep 1.1

Apply [F2] to the quotient inner-product space Dω; under the stated Countable Choice assumption this gives the Hilbert completion Hω and a dense isometric embedding of Dω, which we identify with its image. This is the only completion invoked.

2.2step 1.1step 1.2algebra

For a,b,c∈A, the quotient form gives (πω(a)[b],[c])ω=ω(c∗ab)=([b],πω(a∗)[c])ω. By the definition of the Hilbert-space adjoint, this identity for all [b]∈Dω shows [c]∈D(πω(a)∗) and πω(a)∗[c]=πω(a∗)[c].

2.3givenstep 1.1step 1.2

Since ([1A],[1A])ω=ω(1A)=1, Ωω is a unit vector. Also πω(a)Ωω=[a] for every a∈A, so its algebraic orbit is exactly Dω and is dense. Finally (πω(a)Ωω,Ωω)ω=([a],[1A])ω=ω(a), recovering the state.

2.4givenF1step 1.1step 1.2

Let (H′,D′,ρ,Ω′) be another algebraically cyclic *-representation of A with common invariant dense domain D′=ρ(A)Ω′, ρ(a∗)=ρ(a)∗∣D′, and ω(a)=(ρ(a)Ω′,Ω′). Define U[a]:=ρ(a)Ω′. If [a]=[0], then ∥ρ(a)Ω′∥2=ω(a∗a)=0, so U is well defined; and for a,b∈A, (U[a],U[b])=ω(b∗a)=([a],[b])ω by the representation's adjoint identity. Thus U is an isometry from Dω onto the dense subspace D′.

3.1step 2.2given

Suppose xn∈Dω, xn→0 in Hω, and πω(a)xn→y in Hω. For each z∈Dω, step 2.2 gives (y,z)ω=lim⁡n(πω(a)xn,z)ω=lim⁡n(xn,πω(a∗)z)ω=0. Density forces y=0. Therefore the closed graph relation of πω(a) contains no two distinct outputs over one input: their difference would be a nonzero pair (0,y). The graph closure is a graph, so πω(a) is closable. In particular, if a=a∗ then πω(a) is symmetric on Dω; this does not prove essential self-adjointness.

4.1step 2.3step 2.4step 1.2∎

The isometry extends uniquely from the dense domain to a unitary U‾:Hω→H′ because its range D′ is dense. It sends Ωω to Ω′ and, for [b]∈Dω, U‾πω(a)[b]=ρ(ab)Ω′=ρ(a)U‾[b]; hence it intertwines the representations on the common domains. Uniqueness follows because every vector of Dω has the form πω(a)Ωω.

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passverified 2026-10-15 (gpt-6-luna, gpt-6.1-sol, and delegated Codex review/repair agents; see completed run evidence)Open item page →

State-preserving symmetries implemented unitarily

Statement

Assume Countable Choice ACω, the hypothesis of GNS Hilbert reconstruction with invariant operator domain. Let G be a topological group with identity e. Let A be a unital complex star algebra with positive normalized state ω, and let α:G→Aut⁡∗(A) be a group action: each αg is a bijective complex-linear map preserving product, unit and involution, with αe=id and αgαh=αgh. Suppose ω(αg(a))=ω(a) for all g∈G and a∈A. Also suppose that, for every a,b∈A, the coefficient function g↦ω(b∗αg(a)) is continuous at e.

Use the GNS representation from GNS Hilbert reconstruction with invariant operator domain, with common dense domain Dω and cyclic vector Ωω. Then Ug[a]:=[αg(a)] extends to a strongly continuous unitary representation U:G→U(Hω), fixes Ωω, and satisfies

Ugπω(a)Ug−1∣Dω=πω(αg(a))(a∈A,g∈G).

Here strongly continuous means that g↦Ugξ is norm-continuous for every ξ∈Hω. No differentiability, generator domain or spectral theorem follows from these hypotheses alone.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice ACω, a topological group G, a unital complex star algebra A, a positive normalized state ω, a state-preserving action α by unital star automorphisms, and continuity at e of every g↦ω(b∗αg(a)).

[F1]

GNS Hilbert reconstruction with invariant operator domain: the state has a Hilbert-space GNS representation on a common invariant dense domain Dω=A/Nω, with πω(a)[b]=[ab], Ωω=[1A], and inner product ([a],[b])ω=ω(b∗a).

[A1]

By the action assumptions, each αg is a unital star automorphism, αgh=αg∘αh, and ω∘αg=ω; multiplication and inversion in the topological group are continuous.

[A2]

For every a,b∈A, the scalar function g↦ω(b∗αg(a)) is continuous at e.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1A1given

If n∈Nω, then ω((αgn)∗αgn)=ω(αg(n∗n))=ω(n∗n)=0, so αg(Nω)⊆Nω. Applying the same argument to g−1 gives equality. For a,b∈A, ([αg(a)],[αg(b)])ω=ω(αg(b∗a))=ω(b∗a), so [a]↦[αg(a)] is an isometry on Dω with inverse induced by αg−1; it extends uniquely to a unitary Ug on Hω. The action law gives UgUh=Ugh, and UgΩω=Ωω.

2.1F1A1step 1.1

For [b]∈Dω, Ugπω(a)Ug−1[b]=Ug[aαg−1(b)]=[αg(a)b]=πω(αg(a))[b], using the representation rule and multiplicativity of αg. This is the claimed covariance identity on the common domain.

2.2F1A1A2step 1.1algebra

For a∈A, state invariance and the quotient inner product give ∥Ug[a]−[a]∥2=2ω(a∗a)−ω(a∗αg(a))−ω((αg(a))∗a). The first cross term tends to ω(a∗a) as g→e by [A2]. For the second, invariance gives ω((αg(a))∗a)=ω(αg−1((αg(a))∗a))=ω(a∗αg−1(a)), which also tends to ω(a∗a) by [A2] and continuity of inversion. Thus Ug[a]→[a] for every [a]∈Dω.

3.1step 1.1step 2.2givenalgebra∎

Let ξ∈Hω and ε>0. Choose y∈Dω with ∥ξ−y∥<ε/3. Since each Ug is unitary, ∥Ugξ−ξ∥≤2∥ξ−y∥+∥Ugy−y∥; step 2.2 makes the last term less than ε/3 for g sufficiently near e. Hence every orbit is continuous at e. For any g0∈G, ∥Ugξ−Ug0ξ∥=∥Ug0−1gξ−ξ∥, so continuity of multiplication transfers continuity to g0. The unitary representation is strongly continuous on all of G.

5 · Examples, experiments and counterexamples

None yet.

Sources