How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Clifford Classification, Modules, and Graded Tensor Products: Examples and Counterexamples
1 · Prerequisites
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Chain Conditions, Semisimple Modules and the Wedderburn–Artin Theorem
- Clifford Classification, Modules, and Graded Tensor Products
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Divisibility, Euclidean Domains, Principal Ideal Domains and Unique Factorisation
- Dual Spaces, Bilinear and Quadratic Forms, and Sylvester's Law of Inertia
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Free Modules, Exact Sequences, Projective and Injective Modules
- Group Homomorphisms and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Ideals, Quotient Rings and the Isomorphism Theorems for Rings
- Koszul Complexes and Regular Sequences
- Linear Independence, Bases and Dimension
- Linear Transformations, Rank-Nullity and Quotient Spaces
- Matrices, the Matrix of a Linear Map, and Change of Basis
- Modules, Submodules, Quotient Modules and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Polynomial Rings, the Division Algorithm and Roots
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Simple Field Extensions and the Construction of the Complex Numbers
- Tensor Products of Modules
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Universal Clifford Algebras and Their PBW Basis
- Vector Spaces, Linear Subspaces, Span and Direct Sums
2 · Summary
These examples check the positive-square-first table at low signatures, show how the even subalgebra determines graded-module types, and exhibit the failure of the ordinary tensor product for orthogonal Clifford sums. Each calculation uses the definitions and proved results on real-complex-clifford-classification-and-graded-products.
Worked checks
- Low-signature real Clifford algebras as C, H, and matrix algebras compares the first real matrix and division-algebra cases with the classification table.
- Even-subalgebra types determine small graded Clifford modules checks split and nonsplit even-algebra rows and the resulting graded-simple counts.
- The ordinary tensor product does not model an orthogonal Clifford sum shows that commuting factor generators cannot model the anticommuting generators from orthogonal summands.
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
None yet.
5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
The ordinary tensor product does not model an orthogonal Clifford sum
Statement refuted
For all quadratic spaces, the ordinary algebra tensor product , with multiplication , is the Clifford algebra of the orthogonal sum with its canonical factor maps.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The real Clifford algebras use and the ordinary tensor-product multiplication is the one displayed in the refuted statement.
and , with the specified positive-square-first convention (Low-dimensional real Clifford algebra models).
Counterexample
Choose with positive quadratic form . By [F1], each Clifford factor is , hence commutative. For simple tensors, , and bilinearity extends commutativity to the whole ordinary tensor product.
By [F1], the orthogonal-sum Clifford algebra is , which is noncommutative because while . Thus it cannot be isomorphic as an algebra to the commutative ordinary tensor product in step 1.1, refuting the claim.
Remarks
The graded tensor product The graded tensor product for orthogonal sums of quadratic spaces inserts the Koszul sign when the two odd generators are multiplied in the reverse order; that sign produces the required anticommutation.
Low-signature real Clifford algebras as C, H, and matrix algebras
Example
With and signatures ordered , the five signatures , , , , and give respectively
This checks the sign and indexing conventions at the smallest dimensions.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The five standard real forms listed above.
The real classification table depends on and the total dimension (Real and complex Clifford algebra classification with explicit signature).
The low-dimensional algebra identifications are , , , , and (Low-dimensional real Clifford algebra models).
A linear map satisfying every quadratic square relation extends uniquely to a unital Clifford-algebra homomorphism (Universal property of the Clifford algebra).
Ordered square-free monomials form a Clifford basis, of dimension in dimension (PBW basis and exterior associated graded for a Clifford algebra).
The coefficient algebras have real bases for and for , with and in (Real, complex, and quaternion coefficient algebras and matrix notation).
Verification
For , and , so [F1] gives . For , , giving . For , , giving ; for , , also ; and for , , giving .
Set , , and . Direct multiplication gives , , , and . Thus and . The four matrices are linearly independent: a zero linear combination has diagonal entries and off-diagonal entries , forcing all coefficients to vanish.
For the five signatures in order, send the standard generators to , to , to , to , and to . The one-generator images have the required squares; step 1.2 checks every linear combination in both matrix cases; and [F5] gives in the quaternion case. Hence [F3] extends each linear map to a unital algebra homomorphism. The images of the ordered monomials are respectively the real bases ; ; ; ; and . They span each target and are linearly independent by step 1.2 and [F5], and the source dimensions are by [F4]. Each homomorphism is therefore an isomorphism, explicitly realizing [F2] and agreeing with step 1.1.
Even-subalgebra types determine small graded Clifford modules
Example
For signatures , , , , and , the even subalgebras are respectively , , , , and . Hence their graded-simple module counts and coefficient types are respectively one real, one real, one complex, two real, and one complex.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The positive-square-first convention and the five real Clifford algebras in the Example.
The even subalgebra of is for and for (Even subalgebras of real and complex Clifford algebras).
Graded-simple Clifford modules correspond to simple modules over the even subalgebra; matrix algebra factors determine their coefficient types (Irreducible graded Clifford modules and real, complex, and quaternionic types).
The Clifford algebra of the zero vector space over is (The zero-dimensional Clifford algebra is the base field).
Verification
For and , [F1] gives even algebras and ; [F3]–[F4] identify these with and . For and it gives and . For it gives by [F4].
The fields and each have one simple module of their own coefficient type, while has two simple modules, one supported on each factor. Applying [F2] therefore gives the five counts and types in the Example. In every positive-dimensional case an invertible odd generator identifies the two parity components, so each resulting graded module has equal dimensions in degrees and .