Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Pure and Mixed States, Ensembles, and Schmidt Decomposition — Examples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

The Bell vector is already a two-term Schmidt form: its positive coefficients are both 1/2 and each factor family is an ordered orthonormal basis. Expanding its outer product and contracting either factor gives I2/2, checking the tensor order and partial-trace index convention directly. The example also shows that this density operator has two distinct equal-weight ensemble decompositions, in the computational and {∣+⟩,∣−⟩} bases; see Bell-state Schmidt decomposition and reduced density.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

Bell-state Schmidt decomposition and reduced density

Statement

For H=K=C2 with ordered standard bases e0,e1, the Bell vector Ψ=(e0⊗e0+e1⊗e1)/2 is already in Schmidt form: it is a finite sum ∑jsjuj⊗vj with positive coefficients and orthonormal families in both factors, here s0=s1=1/2 and uj=vj=ej. Its reduced state on either factor is I2/2.

Example

The product-basis coordinates make the two product terms orthogonal, and the partial trace removes the two off-diagonal cross terms. Both reductions are therefore maximally mixed on the two-dimensional factor. The same state I2/2 is also the barycenter of either the equal-weight computational-basis projectors or the equal-weight {∣+⟩,∣−⟩} projectors, giving two distinct ensemble descriptions of one density operator.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: H=K=C2, their ordered standard bases, and tensor order H then K.

[F2]

The standard formulas ⟨x,y⟩=∑k<nxkyk on Rn and ∑k<nxkyk‾ on Cn are inner products: ⟨z,w⟩=∑r<2zrwr‾ on C2, so e0,e1 are orthonormal.

[F3]

Ordered tensor registers, their inner product, and wire permutations: the ordered product basis has product pairings, and a factor permutation maps each basis tensor to the tensor with reordered factors.

[F4]

Partial trace over a finite tensor factor: the partial trace over the second factor sums matrix entries with equal auxiliary indices.

[F5]

Dirac Notation Conversion: ∣x⟩⟨y∣ acts by z↦⟨z,y⟩x.

[F6]

Ray-to-projector is well-defined and bijective and Density operator: for each unit vector v, Pv=∣v⟩⟨v∣ is a density operator.

[F7]

Ensemble and purification: a finite list of density operators with nonnegative weights summing to one is an ensemble, and its barycenter is the weighted operator sum.

Verification

1.1givenF1F2F3algebra

By [F1]–[F2], e0,e1 are an ordered orthonormal basis. Taking uj=ej and vj=ej for j=0,1, the displayed expression for Ψ is a finite sum with positive coefficients s0=s1=1/2 and orthonormal families in both factors. The product basis from [F3] is orthonormal, so ∥Ψ∥2=12(1+1)=1. Hence this expression is a Schmidt form by the finite-sum definition in the statement.

1.2givenF1F2F3F4F5algebra

Expanding the outer product using [F5] gives ∣Ψ⟩⟨Ψ∣=12(∣e0e0⟩⟨e0e0∣+∣e0e0⟩⟨e1e1∣+∣e1e1⟩⟨e0e0∣+∣e1e1⟩⟨e1e1∣). Contracting the second factor by [F4] kills the cross terms and leaves 12(∣e0⟩⟨e0∣+∣e1⟩⟨e1∣)=I2/2.

2.1F1F2F3F4F5step 1.2algebra

The factor permutation in [F3] sends e0⊗e0 and e1⊗e1 to themselves, so the reordered vector has the same expression as Ψ. Apply [F4] to trace its second factor, now the original H factor; the same contraction as in step 1.2 gives 12(∣e0⟩⟨e0∣+∣e1⟩⟨e1∣)=I2/2 on the original K.

3.1givenF1F2F5F6F7F8algebra∎

Set ∣+⟩=(e0+e1)/2 and ∣−⟩=(e0−e1)/2, and write Pv=∣v⟩⟨v∣ for v=e0,e1,+,−. These vectors are unit by [F1]–[F2], so [F6] makes their projectors density operators. By [F7], the pairs (12,Pe0),(12,Pe1) and (12,P+),(12,P−) are finite ensembles. Expanding the outer products with [F5] gives P++P−=Pe0+Pe1. Since (e0,e1) is an orthonormal basis by [F1]–[F2], each z∈C2 satisfies z=⟨z,e0⟩e0+⟨z,e1⟩e1, so Pe0+Pe1=I2. Both ensemble barycenters are therefore I2/2, which is a density operator by [F8]. The ensembles are distinct because Pe0 and P+ have different one-dimensional ranges. Thus the same density operator has two ensemble descriptions.

Sources