How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Each normaliser coset has exactly one root-permuting representative
Statement
Let be an arbitrary-rank Coxeter system in its standard real root representation, with simple roots and length . Fix , put and , and write and . These are the conventions of Root-permuting normaliser complement; is a subgroup of .
Each coset with contains exactly one element of .
Facts & Assumptions
The declared suppliers provide the subgroup and previously established assertions:
Proof
Given: The data in the statement. Goal: Prove its conclusion.
The minimum-normaliser-root-basis supplier in [F1] gives an element of in every indicated coset. This proves existence of a root-permuting representative.
The root-permutation-minimum supplier in [F1] says that every element of in this coset must be its unique minimum-length element. Thus any two root-permuting representatives in that coset are equal. Together with step 1.1, this proves existence and uniqueness.
Depends on
Used by · 1
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.