How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Root-permuting normaliser complement
PDF p. 17: paragraph before Corollary 4.8
Definition
Let be a Coxeter system with simple generators and geometric representation on the real vector space with basis . The index set may be infinite. For , write and .
The root-permuting normaliser subgroup , also denoted , is
It is the vertex group at of the Brink–Howlett groupoid and is a subgroup of .
Definition references
Justification
Put . By the Coxeter-data definition, each has a word with finite index support , and each simple reflection changes any vector by a multiple of its own simple root. Consequently preserves the span of the roots indexed by , and lies in that span for every .
Suppose . If , comparison of basis coefficients shows that . If , the image lies in the span of the roots indexed by , so belongs to . Since acts invertibly, its restriction to this finite set is injective and hence bijective. Thus , including when is infinite. The converse is immediate. The Brink–Howlett definition identifies the elements satisfying this equality with the labels of endomorphisms of the object . By Connected small groupoids and vertex groups, these endomorphisms, with multiplication and inverses inherited from , form the vertex group .
It remains to check inclusion in the normaliser. The reflection formula in the Coxeter-data definition shows that each simple reflection preserves the Coxeter form ; hence so does . If , conjugating the reflection formula gives on the geometric representation. Choose a finite set of indices containing , and the support of a word for . The corresponding finite-generator Coxeter group embeds in by Finite-generator standard parabolics and the Bruhat subword property at arbitrary rank, and its geometric representation is faithful by The root-length criterion and faithfulness of the canonical reflection representation. Restricting the displayed equality to its root span therefore gives in . Since permutes , it permutes the generators under conjugation. It follows from the definition of the generated subgroup that , as required.
Depends on
- Brink–Howlett groupoid
- Connected small groupoids and vertex groups
- Coxeter-system, roots, length and weak-order conventions
- Standard parabolic subgroups and parabolic roots
- The normalizer N_G(H)={g∈ G:gHg⁻¹=H} of a subgroup
- Finite-generator standard parabolics and the Bruhat subword property at arbitrary rank
- The root-length criterion and faithfulness of the canonical reflection representation
Used by · 9
- Universal Brink–Howlett covering and its deck group
- Coxeter normaliser semidirect product
- Commutative square of arrangement, ribbon and Brink–Howlett groupoids
- Eight-element D4 normaliser quotient vertex group
- Minimum representatives of normaliser cosets preserve the simple roots
- Root-permuting elements are minimum coset representatives
- Each normaliser coset has exactly one root-permuting representative
- Every normalising element factors through the root-permuting subgroup
- The root-permuting subgroup intersects the parabolic trivially
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.
Sources
- Normalisers of parabolic subgroups of Artin–Tits groups and Tits cone intersections · PDF p. 17, paragraph before Corollary 4.8