Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Relative free action, normal cover and exact sequence

PDF p. 3: (1.5); PDF p. 13: §3.3 after Remark 3.27; (3.28)

Statement

Let (W,S) be a finite-rank Coxeter system and J⊆S. Write N(W,J)=Norm⁡W(WJ)/WJ and let XJC be the relative complexified complement of Relative complexified hyperplane complement. The induced diagonal N(W,J)-action on XJC is free and properly discontinuous: every point has an open neighbourhood disjoint from all its nonidentity translates.

The quotient map is a normal covering, meaning a covering whose deck transformations act transitively on every fibre. For x∈XJC and its image x‾, it induces the exact sequence 1→π1(XJC,x)→π1(XJC/N(W,J),x‾)→N(W,J)→1. Fundamental groups use first-path-first multiplication; the last map sends a loop to the unique element taking x to the endpoint of its lift starting at x.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

The relative complement is X=(T×T)∖⋃H∈A(H×H), with its subspace topology. The relative cone is an intersection with E and the relative hyperplanes are proper linear hyperplanes of E. Relative complexified hyperplane complement Tits cone intersections, relative roots and arrangements

[F2]

The full Tits cone is convex by clause (4) of The finite-negativity criterion, the reduction step, and convexity of the Tits cone, applied to the finite set S and its canonical geometric representation. Under the simple-root basis identification es=αs, its dual action and union of translates of the closed fundamental chamber agree with those used here. The relative cone is Cone∩E, and T is its interior in E, hence is open. Coxeter-system, roots, length and weak-order conventions Tits cone intersections, relative roots and arrangements The arrangement A is locally finite in T. Local finiteness of the interior relative arrangement

[F3]

The normaliser quotient acts linearly on E, preserving the relative cone. Every normaliser representative preserves E, and the kernel of this restricted action is WJ. The relative hyperplanes are the proper traces in E of root hyperplanes. An invertible linear map preserving T and permuting A restricts diagonally to a homeomorphism of X. Faithful normaliser-quotient action on the relative cone Tits cone intersections, relative roots and arrangements Complexified complements in an open convex cone

[F4]

A chamber is a connected component of T∖⋃A. The induced action on chambers is free. Chambers, walls and adjacency Normaliser action on labels, orbits and adjacency

[F5]

An action by homeomorphisms on a nonempty, path-connected, locally path-connected space with a disjoint-translate neighbourhood at every point has a regular orbit covering with deck group the acting group and the endpoint-lift exact sequence stated above. Covering-space actions and fundamental-groupoid quotients

[F6]

In the geometric representation, the root set is Φ={wαi:w∈W, i∈Γ0} and the contragredient action is (wf)(v)=f(w−1v). Coxeter-system, roots, length and weak-order conventions

Proof

Given: The finite-rank system and subset J in the Statement. Put E=ΘJ, T=Cone(J)∘, and let A consist of the relative hyperplanes meeting T.

Goal: Prove the neighbourhood condition, covering assertion, and exact sequence.

Given: The objects in the Statement and Facts.

Goal: Verify the hypotheses of [F5] and apply it.

Proof technique: direct.

1.1F1F2F3

By [F1] and [F2], the relative cone is convex, being the intersection of the convex full Tits cone with the linear subspace E. If a,b∈T, choose r>0 such that BE(a,r) and BE(b,r) are contained in the relative cone. For 0≤s≤1 and ∥h∥<r, convexity puts (1−s)(a+h)+s(b+h)=(1−s)a+sb+h in that cone. Thus the ball BE((1−s)a+sb,r) lies in the relative cone, so (1−s)a+sb∈T. Hence T is convex. The coordinate face CJ, consisting of functionals vanishing on J and strictly positive on S∖J, is a nonempty open subset of E contained in the closed fundamental chamber and hence in the relative cone. Thus T is nonempty. Local finiteness implies that the union of the hyperplanes in T is relatively closed: near each point only finitely many need be considered. A nonempty open subset of a finite-dimensional real vector space cannot be covered by finitely many proper hyperplanes, so a locally finite family of such hyperplanes has nonempty complement in T. In particular X is nonempty. The same local-finiteness argument shows that the deleted union in T×T is closed there; consequently X is open in the Euclidean space E×E and is locally path-connected. These statements include the zero-dimensional case, where there are no proper hyperplanes.

1.2F1F2F4

Let (u,v)∈X. Choose a neighbourhood of u meeting only finitely many members of A. For sufficiently small positive t, u+tv is in that neighbourhood and in T. If a hyperplane in the finite list contains u, it does not contain v, since (u,v)∈X; therefore it does not contain u+tv. For each remaining hyperplane in the list, at most one value of t makes u+tv lie on it. Choose t avoiding those finitely many values. Then u+tv belongs to a chamber C.

1.3F1F3F4F6

Let w∈Norm⁡W(WJ). For α=uαi∈Φ, the equality wα=(wu)αi shows wα∈Φ; applying this also to w−1 gives wΦ=Φ. For Hα={f:f(α)=0}, the dual formula gives (wf)(wα)=f(α), hence wHα=Hwα. Since wE=E, it follows that w(Hα∩E)=Hwα∩E, and a trace is proper exactly when its image is proper. Thus w permutes the relative hyperplanes. The restricted linear homeomorphism preserves the relative cone and therefore its interior T, so it permutes precisely those relative hyperplanes meeting T, namely A. Its diagonal map consequently restricts to a homeomorphism of X. This action factors through N(W,J) because WJ fixes E pointwise. In particular the quotient acts by homeomorphisms on the arrangement complement in T and permutes its connected components, the chambers.

2.1F3F4step 1.1step 1.2step 1.3

The arrangement complement in T is open by step 1.1, and each of its components is open because sufficiently small Euclidean balls are connected. Hence U={(a,b)∈X:a+tb∈C} is an open neighbourhood of (u,v). If gU∩U≠∅, linearity gives gC∩C≠∅. The homeomorphism g permutes chambers, so gC=C; by chamber freeness g is the identity. Thus every point has a disjoint-translate neighbourhood, which also proves freeness.

2.2F1F2step 1.1

Let p,q∈X. Their straight segment lies in the open convex set T×T. By compactness of that segment and local finiteness in each coordinate, a sufficiently small open tubular neighbourhood of the segment lies in T×T and meets only finitely many sets H×H. It can be chosen convex. For each such H, the set of intermediate points z for which either segment [p,z] or [z,q] meets H×H is contained in the union of the affine spans of H×H with p and with q. Because p,q∉H×H and H×H has codimension two, these spans are proper affine subspaces. A finite union of proper affine subspaces cannot cover the nonempty tube. Choose z outside that union. Both segments remain in the tube and avoid every deleted set, so they form a path in X from p to q. If E has dimension zero, X is a point and the conclusion is immediate.

3.1F5step 1.1step 2.1step 2.2∎

Steps 1.1, 2.1 and 2.2 verify all hypotheses of [F5]. Applying it gives the normal covering, identifies its deck group with N(W,J), and yields the exact sequence with the stated endpoint-lift map.

Source notes

The article is cited for attribution of the retained claim. The local argument above derives the covering hypotheses from the declared suppliers and does not use the article's assertion as its own proof.

Depends on

Used by · 7

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.

Sources