How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Typical regular graphs are almost Ramanujan
PDF p. 7: Section 1.3, paragraph citing Friedman [20]
Statement
Fix an integer and . A uniformly chosen labelled simple -regular graph on vertices is, with high probability, an -expander with . The limit is as through orders for which such graphs exist, with and fixed.
Here simple means without loops or repeated edges, and -regular means that every vertex has neighbors. Uniformly chosen means that every such graph on has equal probability; with high probability means that the probability tends to one. For adjacency matrix and all-ones matrix , the expander condition is , where the operator norm is induced by the Euclidean norm. This is the almost-Ramanujan assertion attributed to Friedman in the article.
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
For fixed integer and fixed , in the uniform labelled simple -regular model, the probability that tends to zero along feasible orders. The real adjacency eigenvalues are ordered with multiplicity as (Friedman spectral expansion in the uniform simple model).
For a labelled simple -regular graph with and , (Ordered eigenvalues and the centered regular norm).
In the stated model the expander event is the centered norm inequality above, and high probability is convergence of its probability to one along feasible orders (Adjacency spectral expander — Definition 1.3, Adjacency, degrees, graph Laplacian, and spectral notation, Uniform random regular graph convention, Asymptotic quantifiers and uniform parameter ranges).
Proof
Given: Fixed integer and fixed , with the uniform simple regular graph law at each feasible order.
Goal: Show that the -expander event has probability tending to one for .
By [F1], the event that has probability tending to one. The graph law and feasible-order limit here are exactly those in the statement.
By [F2], on this event . It therefore satisfies the non-strict expander inequality in [F3]. Its probability is at least that of the event in step 1.1 and at most one, so it tends to one.
Depends on
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.
Sources
- Expander graphs are globally synchronizing · PDF p. 7, Section 1.3, paragraph citing Friedman [20]