How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Uniform random regular graph convention
PDF p. 7: Section 1.3, Friedman discussion; PDF p. 9: Section 1.5, Hamiltonian random regular graphs
Definition
Let be a positive integer and a nonnegative integer. Put . A simple graph on has as its edges a set of unordered pairs of distinct vertices; its degree at a vertex is the number of edges incident to that vertex. It is -regular if every vertex has degree . Let be the set of all such graphs on the labelled vertex set .
When is nonempty, a uniformly random -regular graph on vertices is a random element of under the uniform law: each graph has probability , and an event has probability . An order is feasible for when is nonempty.
For fixed , limits as in this model run through feasible orders. A sequence of events holds with high probability if, for every , there is an such that for every feasible .
Definition references
Facts & Assumptions
For a finite graph with binary adjacency, degree is the adjacency row sum and -regularity means that every row sum equals (Adjacency, degrees, graph Laplacian, and spectral notation).
On a nonempty finite set, the uniform probability of an event is its cardinality divided by the cardinality of the set (The uniform probability space on a nonempty finite set).
For events indexed by an unbounded set of orders, holding with high probability means that their probabilities tend to one along that set (Asymptotic quantifiers and uniform parameter ranges).
Justification
Given: A positive integer and a nonnegative integer ; for the probability law suppose that is feasible, and for the limit keep fixed.
Goal: Verify that the stated graph law and asymptotic convention are well defined.
1.1 There are finitely many unordered pairs of distinct vertices, so there are finitely many possible edge sets and is finite. For a simple graph, each incident edge contributes exactly one to the adjacency row sum, so its degree and regularity agree with [F1]. At a feasible order the outcome set is nonempty; [F2] therefore gives the stated uniform probabilities for every event. [given, F1, F2]
2.1 For every positive integer , take disjoint blocks of vertices and include every edge within each block and no edge between blocks. Every vertex has exactly neighbors, including when , so is feasible. Thus feasible orders are unbounded. The displayed quantifier condition is exactly convergence of the event probabilities to one along those orders, as in [F3]. This establishes the convention. [given, F3, construct, step 1.1] ∎
Source notes
The article discusses uniformly chosen regular graphs and high-probability conclusions in Sections 1.3 and 1.5, and explicitly considers the limit as grows in Section 5. Its citation is attribution for that usage; the argument above uses the stated mathematical suppliers.
Depends on
Used by · 5
- Typical regular graphs are almost Ramanujan
- Typical regular graphs are Hamiltonian
- Ramanujan and typical regular graphs synchronize for degree at least 600
- Destroying cycle spurious minima by bounded-degree edge additions
- Historical regular-graph synchronization question and subsequent negative-resolution claims
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.
Sources
- Expander graphs are globally synchronizing · PDF p. 7, Section 1.3; PDF p. 9, Section 1.5; PDF p. 28, Section 5