Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Time-local interaction-picture convention

PDF p. 10: Eqs. (S2.4)–(S2.6)

Definition

Assume the Axiom of Choice and Countable Choice. Work in units with ℏ=1. Let HS and HB be complex Hilbert spaces, called the system and bath spaces, and let the real time t belong to an interval containing 0. A unitary on a Hilbert space is a bounded linear operator from that space to itself whose Hilbert adjoint, denoted by †, is its inverse. Suppose a prescribed system Hamiltonian HS(t) has a specified unitary propagator US(t) on HS with US(0)=I, conventionally written US(t)=Texp⁡[−i∫0tHS(s) ds]; T means that later times appear to the left in the ordered expansion. This notation assumes the propagator exists; in particular, it is defined by the norm-convergent ordered series when HS is a norm-continuous family of bounded self-adjoint operators on a compact interval containing 0 and t.

For any time-local linear system operator O(t):D(O(t))→HS, with linear domain D(O(t))⊆HS, time-local meaning specified at that same time, define its interaction-picture representative by O~(t)=US(t)†O(t)US(t); the original operator is recovered by O(t)=US(t)O~(t)US(t)†. This convention includes time-dependent jump operators, which are operators used to represent dissipative terms, and the Lamb-shift operator, a Hamiltonian correction. For an unbounded O(t), the conjugated operator has domain US(t)†D(O(t)); the inverse identity is an equality of operators with their domains.

Let the bath Hamiltonian HB be self-adjoint on HB, possibly unbounded, and let Bα:D(Bα)→HB be a linear bath operator with linear domain D(Bα)⊆HB. The bath convention is B~α(t)=eiHBtBαe−iHBt, where the exponentials are the unitary group supplied by the self-adjoint functional calculus. If Bα is unbounded, its transformed domain is eiHBtD(Bα). These formulas specify a change of representation; they do not assert a physical evolution law or establish existence of a propagator for every time-dependent unbounded Hamiltonian.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

Under Countable Choice, a norm-continuous bounded self-adjoint operator family on a compact interval has a unique unitary propagator given by its norm-convergent, latest-time-left Dyson series. Norm Dyson series and uniqueness

[F2]

Under the Axiom of Choice, a self-adjoint operator generates the strongly continuous unitary group eitH through its functional calculus. Stone's theorem: unitary groups and self-adjoint generators

[A1]

Adopt the Axiom of Choice and Countable Choice for the respective supplier hypotheses. The Axiom of Choice The Axiom of Countable Choice (AC_ω)

Justification

Given: The Hilbert spaces, times, specified system propagator, operators and domains in the definition, together with the choice assumptions.

Goal: Verify that the stated conjugations and inverse are well defined, including the stated sufficient case for the system propagator.

1.1 In the norm-continuous bounded self-adjoint case, [F1] applies on the compact interval with ℏ=1 and initial time 0: its unique unitary solution is the latest-time-left ordered series denoted by the time-ordered exponential. In the more general case, existence and unitarity of US(t) are explicitly assumed. By [F2], the bath exponentials exist as bounded unitaries even when HB is unbounded. [given, A1, F1, F2]

2.1 For a unitary U on a Hilbert space H and a linear operator O:D(O)→H with linear domain D(O)⊆H, U†OU is defined exactly on U†D(O). Conjugating it back gives domain U(U†D(O))=D(O) and action UU†OUU†x=Ox there. Applying this to US(t) proves the system formulas. Applying it to U=e−iHBt gives the bath formula and its stated domain. Thus all displayed conjugations are well defined on their stated domains. [given, step 1.1, algebra] ∎

Depends on

Used by · 2

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.

Sources