Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Bath correlation matrix and Fourier convention

PDF p. 10: Eqs. (S2.5)–(S2.6)

Definition

Assume the Axiom of Choice and Countable Choice. Work in units with ℏ=1. Let HB be a self-adjoint bath Hamiltonian on a complex Hilbert space, ρB a stationary bath density operator, and B1,…,Bn bath coupling operators, with n a finite nonnegative integer. Stationary means ρB is unchanged by the free bath unitary evolution. A density operator is positive, trace class and has trace one. Write Tr⁡B for the basis-independent trace of a trace-class operator on the bath space, and define the interaction-picture bath operators by B~α(t)=eiHBtBαe−iHBt.

Whenever the products in the following expression have well-defined traces in this trace-class sense and the resulting two-time functions are invariant under a common time translation, the bath correlation matrix is the matrix-valued function of the time difference defined by Jαβ(t−s)=Tr⁡B[B~α(t)B~β(s)ρB]. In particular Jαβ(t) uses the second time s=0. If every entry is Lebesgue integrable over R, define its spectral density, with the article's Fourier convention, by Jαβ(ω)=(2π)−1∫−∞∞Jαβ(t)eiωt dt. Here α,β label coupling channels and ω is real angular frequency. For n=0, the correlation and its spectrum are the unique empty 0×0 matrices; there are no entries to integrate.

For unbounded bath operators the trace condition includes the necessary operator domains and trace-class products. Stationarity alone does not imply integrability. If that integrability condition fails, the density formula above supplies no spectral density; any extension beyond it requires a separately specified convention.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

The system–bath coupling postulate uses finitely many bath coupling channels and a stationary bath, and records the same two-time correlation when its traces exist. ULE system–bath coupling and short bath memory

[F2]

For self-adjoint HB, the bath interaction-picture convention supplies the unitary conjugation and specifies its domain for an unbounded bath operator, under the stated choice assumptions. Time-local interaction-picture convention

[F3]

For a positive integer number of channels, the stationary-spectrum contract defines the entrywise Fourier integral with factor (2π)−1 for an integrable matrix correlation. Stationary correlation spectra and ULE kernel regularity

[F4]

Under Countable Choice, trace class means compact with summable singular values. Every trace-class operator on a complex Hilbert space has a well-defined complex trace, equal to the absolutely convergent diagonal sum for every supplied Hilbert basis and independent of that basis. Trace class operator Trace of a trace class operator Trace is absolutely convergent and basis independent

[F5]

Use Lebesgue measure λ on R, written dt in the Fourier integral; under Countable Choice it is a measure on the Lebesgue sigma-algebra. A complex function h is Lebesgue integrable when it is measurable and ∫R∣h∣ dλ<∞; its integral is ∫h dλ=∫Re⁡h dλ+i∫Im⁡h dλ. Integrable real and complex functions, and their integrals Lebesgue measurable sets, the family L(ℝⁿ), and the restricted set function λₙ Assuming countable choice, L(ℝⁿ) is a sigma-algebra containing every elementary set and λₙ is a complete measure extending elementary volume

[A1]

Assume the Axiom of Choice and Countable Choice for the interaction-picture, trace and Lebesgue-measure suppliers and their stated hypotheses. The Axiom of Choice The Axiom of Countable Choice (AC_ω)

Justification

Given: The bath data, choice assumptions, trace and common-time-translation conditions, and the entrywise integrability condition where the spectral density is used.

Goal: Verify that the displayed correlation and spectral density are well defined under those conditions.

1.1 By [F2], each bath unitary conjugation is defined on its stated transformed domain. The trace and domain conditions explicitly required in the definition put each displayed product in the trace class, so [F4], under Countable Choice from [A1], gives a basis-independent complex number for each two-time entry. Common-time-translation invariance makes this number depend only on t−s: translating both times by −s gives the value at (t−s,0). Thus the definition assigns one value to each time difference. [given, A1, F2, F4, algebra]

2.1 If n=0, both matrices are empty and no Fourier supplier is invoked. Otherwise n is a positive integer, so the finite channel set gives a finite matrix of these functions, in the coupling convention of [F1]. Interpret the integrability condition using Lebesgue measure and the complex integral in [F5], under [A1]. When each entry is integrable, all hypotheses of the Fourier-definition part of [F3] hold, and it applies entrywise to make the displayed Fourier integral finite for every real ω, with the stated normalization and sign. The assumptions do not assert that a nonintegrable correlation has an ordinary spectral density. [given, A1, F1, F3, F5, step 1.1] ∎

Depends on

Used by · 6

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.

Sources