Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-generatedProof: AI-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Signed diagonal binomial moments agree at order one

Statement

For the real arrays α,β of the signed spin-four isometry, define wj,a,b=(6j)/(8j+a)(8j+b) for integers j,a,b with 0≤j≤6 and 0≤a,b≤2. Then Dab=∑j=06wj,a,b(αj+aαj+b−βj+aβj+b)=0 for all nine pairs (a,b)∈{0,1,2}2. The common diagonal weighted norms at a=0,1,2 are 5/14,1/7,5/14, respectively. Equivalently one may sum to 8, declaring each term with j>6 to be zero before taking any quotient.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

The real arrays have supports {0,6} and {2,8}, respectively, with α02=β82=1/3 and α62=β22=2/3. Each individual support has its two indices separated by six. Real coefficient arrays for the signed spin-four isometry

[F2]

For natural numbers n,k, (nk) is the number of k-element subsets of an n-element set. In particular (n0)=(nn)=1, (n1)=n, and (nk)=0 for k>n. The set [A]ᵏ of k-element subsets and the binomial coefficient C(n, k) := | [n]ᵏ|

Proof

Given: The real arrays, integer index ranges and zero-term convention in the Statement.

Goal: Prove all nine diagonal-difference identities and the three common weighted norms.

1.1givenF1F2algebra

For each integer 0≤k≤8, an eight-element set has a k-element subset, so (8k)>0 by [F2]. The index ranges give 0≤j+a,j+b≤8, hence all displayed weights in the sum to 6 are defined. If a≠b, a nonzero product from one array would require two supported indices to differ by b−a, whose nonzero absolute value is at most two. By [F1] its distinct supported indices differ by six. Thus no such product exists, and both weighted sums vanish for all a≠b.

1.2F2algebra

Count the needed binomial values from [F2]. Each two-element subset of an n-element set occurs twice among the n(n−1) ordered pairs of distinct elements. Each three-element subset of a six-element set occurs six times among its 6⋅5⋅4 ordered triples of distinct elements. Thus (62)=15, (63)=20 and (82)=28. Complementation bijects k-element subsets with (n−k)-element subsets, so together with the boundary and singleton values of [F2] this gives ((6j))j=06=(1,6,15,20,15,6,1) and (80)=(88)=1, (86)=28.

2.1givenF1F2step 1.1step 1.2algebra∎

For a=b=0, the alpha sum is 1/3+(2/3)/28=5/14, while the beta sum is (2/3)15/28=5/14. For a=b=1, the alpha sum is (2/3)6/28=1/7, and the beta sum is the same. For a=b=2, the alpha sum is (2/3)15/28=5/14, while the beta sum is (2/3)/28+1/3=5/14. These are all supported contributions by [F1], and the binomial values are those of step 1.2. Taking differences proves all remaining Daa=0. If the sum is extended to 8, its additional terms are zero by the stated convention, which never evaluates a quotient outside the original range. Together with step 1.1 this proves every claim.

Depends on

Used by · 1

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.