Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-generatedProof: AI-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Real coefficient arrays for the signed spin-four isometry

Statement

In V4 set u0=1/3e4,−4+2/3e4,2 and u1=2/3e4,−2−1/3e4,4. Let e0,e1 be the standard orthonormal basis of C2, and define V:C2→V4 on every input by V(z0e0+z1e1)=z0u0+z1u1 for z0,z1∈C. This is the unique complex-linear map with Veμ=uμ for μ=0,1, and it is an isometry: ∥Vx∥=∥x∥ for every x∈C2, where ∥w∥=⟨w,w⟩ for the standard coordinate inner products. Under j=m+4, its real coefficient arrays are α0=1/3, α6=2/3, β2=2/3, β8=−1/3, and zero elsewhere. In particular ∑j=08αjβj=0 and ∑αj2=∑βj2=1.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

The magnetic basis of a spin block is orthonormal and indexed from minus spin to spin. Finite spin blocks, spherical tensors and Clebsch–Gordan phases

[F2]

A map between vector spaces over C is complex-linear when it preserves ax+by for every pair of vectors x,y and scalars a,b∈C. Linear map between vector spaces over the same field

[F3]

In the specified orthonormal bases of finite coordinate spaces, ⟨x,y⟩=∑ixiyi‾, and the adjoint of a linear map is represented by its conjugate-transpose matrix. Here V∗ denotes this adjoint and I2 the identity matrix on C2. Finite operator and ket conventions

Proof

Given: The vectors, coordinate spaces and map in the Statement.

Goal: Prove complex-linearity, uniqueness, isometry and the coefficient identities.

1.1F1algebra

The substitution j=m+4 sends magnetic labels −4,2,−2,4 to 0,6,2,8. Reading the two displayed vectors in the orthonormal basis gives exactly the listed arrays, including the negative coefficient at j=8. Their supports {0,6} and {2,8} are disjoint, so every summand of ∑αjβj vanishes.

1.2F2F3givenalgebra

Each x∈C2 has unique coordinates x=z0e0+z1e1, so the stated formula defines V on its entire domain. If y=w0e0+w1e1 and a,b∈C, then V(ax+by)=(az0+bw0)u0+(az1+bw1)u1=aVx+bVy. Thus V is complex-linear. Any other complex-linear map W with the same two basis values satisfies Wx=z0We0+z1We1=z0u0+z1u1=Vx, proving uniqueness.

2.1F1F3step 1.1step 1.2algebra

The squared norm of each column is 1/3+2/3=1, and their inner product is zero by disjoint support. Therefore ∑j=08αj2=∑j=08βj2=1. The conjugate-transpose product of the two-column matrix with itself has these two sums on the diagonal and zero off the diagonal, so V∗V=I2.

3.1F1F3step 1.1step 1.2step 2.1algebra∎

For arbitrary x=z0e0+z1e1, the four supported coordinates give ∥Vx∥2=∣z0∣2(1/3+2/3)+∣z1∣2(2/3+1/3)=∣z0∣2+∣z1∣2=∥x∥2. Taking nonnegative square roots proves norm preservation, hence the stated isometry. Together with steps 1.1 and 2.1 this proves all three coefficient identities.

Depends on

Used by · 3

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.