How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A uniform transpose-fidelity bound for the one-decay channel
Statement
Let be a channel such that and , with . Let be its transpose recovery for the full logical code . Then . More precisely, if denotes the adjoint for the Hilbert–Schmidt inner product and , , , , then Here is the sum of squared entry moduli.
Facts & Assumptions
For code the transpose map has Kraus maps , with no output-support ambiguity when is positive definite. Transpose (Petz) recovery on a code
The qubit entanglement fidelity is the maximally entangled overlap and is linear in the recovered channel. Entanglement fidelity on a finite logical space
Use finite matrix units, adjoints and ordered tensor coordinates. Finite operator and ket conventions
A finite-dimensional channel has a finite Kraus representation with normalized adjoint-product sum. Finite channel, Kraus, Choi, and Stinespring equivalence
For compatible finite rectangular matrices and , the diagonal-sum trace satisfies ; in particular, square matrix trace is cyclic. Finite matrix trace cyclicity and nondegeneracy
Proof
Given: The channel, its two specified output matrices and the full logical code.
Goal: Obtain a positive-square expression for its recovered fidelity and a uniform lower bound.
Choose a finite Kraus representation by [F4]. Its Hilbert–Schmidt adjoint is , since rectangular trace cyclicity in [F5] verifies the defining adjoint identity entrywise. Because , the transpose formula [F1] gives . Hence and for every matrix .
Expanding the qubit maximally entangled projector in matrix units in [F2] gives . The sum is unchanged under any orthonormal change of matrix basis: substituting its unitary coefficient matrix makes the cross coefficients collapse to Kronecker deltas. The four stated are an orthonormal basis, as multiplication of their entries verifies. Thus .
The first specified output has . The second has . The remaining two squared norms are nonnegative, so their sum with these first two is at least one. Substitution in step 2.1 gives .
Depends on
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.