Alphabeta Math
Physics theoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Onset of the third four-level Kraus operator

PDF p. 3: Kraus-rank paragraph; PDF p. 7: Onset paragraph and Fig. 5

Statement

Assume the four-level spontaneous-decay model, with decay rate γ>0, elapsed time t>0, and real splitting Δ. The channel acts on the full four-dimensional state space with ordered orthonormal basis ∣0⟩,∣1⟩,∣2⟩,∣3⟩. Its Kraus rank, the minimum number of operators in a Kraus representation of the channel, is two when Δ=0 and three when Δ≠0. The additional direction is the phase-adjusted difference of the two decay-path operators ∣2⟩⟨0∣ and ∣3⟩⟨1∣; its nonzero weight represents the distinction between the paths in this model.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The model and parameters in the Statement.

Goal: Determine the minimum Kraus representation size and identify the additional direction.

[F1]

The model channel has a Kraus representation K1,K2,K3 in which K1 is diagonal and nonzero, K2=a(uF0+F1) and K3=b(−uF0+F1), where F0=∣2⟩⟨0∣, F1=∣3⟩⟨1∣, ∣u∣=1, a2=e−γtf+(t)/2, and b2=−e−γtf−(t)/2. Here f+(t)=γ∣e(γ+iΔ)t−1∣/∣γ+iΔ∣+(eγt−1). Exact four-level Kraus operators

[F2]

For γ>0 and t>0, f−(t)≤0, with equality exactly when Δ=0. Degenerate four-level amplitude-damping form

[F3]

The input-first unnormalized Choi matrix of a channel is J=∑i,j∣i⟩⟨j∣⊗N(∣i⟩⟨j∣), and the minimum Kraus representation size equals rank⁡J. Kraus rank and Choi representation Kraus rank equals Choi rank

[F4]

The basis outer products obey Tr⁡[(∣k⟩⟨j∣)†∣l⟩⟨m∣]=δklδjm. Finite operator and ket conventions

Proof

1.1givenF1F2F4algebra

Since γt>0, eγt−1>0, so [F1] gives f+(t)>0 and a>0. By [F2], b=0 exactly at Δ=0, and b>0 otherwise. The path operators F0,F1 are nonzero and orthogonal for the Hilbert–Schmidt inner product ⟨A,B⟩=Tr⁡(A†B). Thus K2 is nonzero, and K3 is nonzero exactly when Δ≠0.

2.1F1F3F4step 1.1algebra

By [F4], the diagonal K1 is orthogonal to both path operators, while ⟨uF0+F1,−uF0+F1⟩=−∣u∣2+1=0. Therefore the nonzero operators among K1,K2,K3 are mutually orthogonal and hence linearly independent. Expanding the Choi formula in [F3] using the representation in [F1] gives J=∑k=13∣Kk⟩ ⁣⟩⟨ ⁣⟨Kk∣, where ∣K⟩ ⁣⟩=∑i∣i⟩⊗K∣i⟩. These vectorized operators are mutually orthogonal whenever nonzero, since their inner products are Tr⁡(Kj†Kk). Consequently the rank of J is the number of nonzero operators: two at zero splitting and three otherwise.

3.1F1F3F4step 1.1step 2.1algebra∎

By [F3], this Choi rank is the minimum number of Kraus operators, proving both rank values. The third operator is proportional to −uF0+F1, the phase-adjusted difference of the decay paths; its squared Hilbert–Schmidt norm is 2b2, positive precisely for nonzero splitting. This identifies the additional distinguishability direction as a consequence of the model.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.

Sources