Alphabeta Math
Physics theoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Degenerate four-level amplitude-damping form

PDF p. 7: Eqs. (15)–(16)

Statement

Assume the four-level model and Kraus representation, with t≥0, γ≥0 and real ω0,Δ. In its ordered orthonormal basis ∣0⟩,…,∣3⟩, put Π01=∣0⟩⟨0∣+∣1⟩⟨1∣ and Π23=∣2⟩⟨2∣+∣3⟩⟨3∣. Complex integrals are componentwise Riemann integrals under C≅R2, with ∫00g(s) ds=0. For all these parameters define f−(t)=γ∣∫0te(γ+iΔ)s ds∣−(eγt−1). Where Ω=γ+iΔ is nonzero, this agrees with γ∣eΩt−1∣/∣Ω∣−(eγt−1).

Then f−(t)≤0. If γ>0 and t>0, equality holds exactly when Δ=0. At t=0 or γ=0, equality holds for every Δ. For Δ=0, f−(t)=0 for every t≥0, and the representation reduces to K3=0, K1=e−iω0te−γt/2Π01+Π23 and K2=1−e−γt(∣2⟩⟨0∣+∣3⟩⟨1∣).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The model, representation and parameters in the Statement.

Goal: Establish the sign and equality conditions and the degenerate Kraus operators.

[F1]

The four-level result gives the stated Kraus representation, including its t=0 and γ=0 endpoint conventions, and defines its nonzero-parameter f− by the displayed exponential quotient. Exact four-level Kraus operators

[F2]

Kets, bras, outer products and the ordered orthonormal basis use the finite operator conventions. Finite operator and ket conventions

[F3]

The Riemann integral in Rm, for m=1,2, is componentwise and real-linear, with integral zero on a degenerate interval; identify x+iy with (x,y) for complex integrals. The derivative and the Riemann integral of a vector-valued function: an intrinsic derivative and a componentwise integral

[F4]

A continuous real function on a nondegenerate compact interval is bounded and Riemann integrable. Apply this to each component for complex functions. A continuous function on [a,b] is Riemann integrable, by Heine-Cantor and Riemann's criterion

[F5]

For an integrable function g:[a,b]→Rm with a≤b, ∥∫abg∥2≤∫ab∥g∥2; complex modulus is the Euclidean norm on R2. For a ≤ b and f : [a,b] → ℝᵐ integrable when a<b, ‖∫ₐᵇ f‖₂ ≤ ∫ₐᵇ ‖ f‖₂; for a<b, ‖ f‖₂ is integrable

[F6]

The complex exponential is entire with derivative itself. For real x,y, ex+iy=ex(cos⁡y+isin⁡y) and ∣ex+iy∣=ex; the real exponential is positive. The complex exponential is entire and its complex derivative is itself exp(x+iy)=eˣ(cos y+i sin y), |exp(x+iy)|=eˣ, and e^iπ+1=0 The exponential is positive and satisfies exp(-x)=1/exp(x)

[F7]

If a curve G:[a,b]→Rm, a<b, is differentiable at every point, using the corresponding one-sided derivatives at the endpoints, and G′ is integrable, then ∫abG′=G(b)−G(a). If f : [a,b] → ℝᵐ is differentiable with integrable f' then ∫ₐᵇ f' = f(b)-f(a); and a bounded derivative makes f Lipschitz

[F8]

A continuous nonnegative real function on [a,b], a<b, whose integral is zero vanishes everywhere on that interval. A continuous f ≥ 0 on [a,b] with ∫ₐᵇ f = 0 is identically 0

[F9]

Complex conjugation respects sums and products, zz‾=∣z∣2, modulus is multiplicative and nonnegative, and ∣z∣=0 exactly when z=0. Conjugation is an involutive real-field automorphism, zz̄=|z|², and modulus is definite, multiplicative, and subadditive

Proof

Given: The model, representation and parameters in the Statement.

Goal: Establish the sign and equality conditions and the degenerate Kraus operators.

1.1givenF3F4F6algebra

For each c∈C, the real-parameter curve s↦ecs is continuously differentiable with derivative cecs. Indeed, for c≠0 its difference quotient is c(ec(s+h)−ecs)/(ch), which tends to cecs by [F6]; for c=0 the curve is constant. This also supplies the one-sided derivatives on a restricted compact interval. By [F6], e(γ+iΔ)s=eγseiΔs and ∣eiΔs∣=1. The integrands in the Statement therefore have continuous real and imaginary components and are integrable by [F3] and [F4], including the zero-interval convention. Fixed real-linear coordinate combinations commute with integration by the componentwise formula and real-linearity in [F3].

2.1givenF1F3F4F5F6F7step 1.1algebra

Let A=∫0te(γ+iΔ)s ds and B=∫0teγs ds. For t>0, apply [F7] to the curves in step 1.1 with c=Ω and c=γ; their derivatives are continuous and integrable by [F4]. This gives ΩA=eΩt−1 and γB=eγt−1. The identities also hold at t=0 by [F3]. Thus A=(eΩt−1)/Ω when Ω≠0, agreeing with [F1]. By [F5] and [F6], ∣A∣≤B, so f−=γ(∣A∣−B)≤0, including γ=0.

3.1givenF3F6F8F9step 1.1step 2.1algebra

Suppose γ>0 and t>0. Step 2.1 gives B≥0, and B=0 would contradict [F8] applied to the continuous positive function s↦eγs, so B>0. If f−=0, then ∣A∣=B>0; set u=A/∣A∣, so ∣u∣=1 by [F9]. The function h(s)=eγs∣eiΔs−u∣2 is continuous, real and nonnegative. Expanding its squared modulus using [F9], and integrating real and imaginary parts using [F3] and step 1.1, gives ∫0th(s) ds=2B−2Re⁡(u‾A)=2B−2∣A∣=0.

4.1givenF3F6F8F9step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1algebra

By [F8], h in step 3.1 vanishes everywhere. Positivity of eγs and definiteness of modulus imply eiΔs=u for every s∈[0,t]. At s=0 this gives u=1. The right derivative at zero of this constant curve is zero, whereas step 1.1 computes it as iΔ; hence Δ=0. Conversely, if Δ=0 then A=B and step 2.1 gives f−=0. At t=0 the integrals vanish by [F3], and at γ=0 the defining expression for f− vanishes. This proves all stated equality and endpoint conditions.

5.1givenF1F2step 4.1algebra∎

At Δ=0, [F1] gives the displayed K1,K2,K3 for positive γt, and its endpoint convention gives the same formulas when t=0 or γ=0. By [F2], Π23 is the sum of the two ground-state basis projectors in that representation. Step 4.1 gives f−=0 throughout this degenerate case. This proves the conditional result.

Depends on

Used by · 1

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.

Sources