How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Lemma 4.3: perturbed observability modulo a remainder
PDF p. 18: Lemma 4.3; (4.4)
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice and hypotheses (H) and (W): , is the connected exterior of a nonempty compact smooth nontrapping obstacle, , and is the reference trajectory specified in Reference trajectory hypothesis W. Let be the Dirichlet spectral scale, , and the adjoint evolution in Resolvent-regularized adjoint and its forcing. Let be the cutoffs of Control region and nested real cutoffs, so and . For each there is , depending on the fixed data but not on , such that every , with and , satisfies
Facts & Assumptions
The exterior geometry and nontrapping condition are those of Exterior and truncated obstacle domains and Non-trapping obstacle, and (W) is Reference trajectory hypothesis W. The scale and resolvent satisfy isometrically Dirichlet spectral Sobolev scale and duality. Choice is assumed as in The Axiom of Choice.
The cutoffs satisfy , , and Control region and nested real cutoffs. Multiplication by these cutoffs is bounded on the relevant scale levels Cutoff multipliers through order two and by duality. Time integrals below are squared Bochner norms as specified in Continuous and mixed time-space function spaces.
The regularized adjoint is with , and compatible constructions agree across scale orders Resolvent-regularized adjoint and its forcing. The adjoint evolution and its inverse are uniformly bounded on each level between and Forward and backward real-linear propagators. Higher scale levels embed continuously into lower ones Positive spectral Hilbert scale: duality and interpolation.
For , localized smoothing gives whenever Lemma 4.2: smoothing of the regularized adjoint. Spectral interpolation gives Spectral interpolation and lower-order absorption.
At either or , the localized resolvent commutator gives Integer resolvent commutator and localized first-order bounds.
Proof
[F1] The exterior geometry and nontrapping condition are those of Exterior and truncated obstacle domains and Non-trapping obstacle, and (W) is Reference trajectory hypothesis W. The scale and resolvent satisfy isometrically Dirichlet spectral Sobolev scale and duality. Choice is assumed as in The Axiom of Choice.
[F2] The cutoffs satisfy , , and Control region and nested real cutoffs. Multiplication by these cutoffs is bounded on the relevant scale levels Cutoff multipliers through order two and by duality. Time integrals below are squared Bochner norms as specified in Continuous and mixed time-space function spaces.
[F3] The regularized adjoint is with , and compatible constructions agree across scale orders Resolvent-regularized adjoint and its forcing. The adjoint evolution and its inverse are uniformly bounded on each level between and Forward and backward real-linear propagators. Higher scale levels embed continuously into lower ones Positive spectral Hilbert scale: duality and interpolation.
[F4] For , localized smoothing gives whenever Lemma 4.2: smoothing of the regularized adjoint. Spectral interpolation gives Spectral interpolation and lower-order absorption.
[F5] At either or , the localized resolvent commutator gives Integer resolvent commutator and localized first-order bounds.
Given: The hypotheses, cutoffs, index and datum in the statement. Put and .
Goal: Establish the displayed estimate, uniformly in the datum.
By the inverse evolution bound at order and the resolvent isometry, for every . The same argument at order gives . These statements apply simultaneously by scale embedding and compatibility. Since , integration and the triangle inequality yield and . In the second inequality use .
If , the pointwise cutoff inequality in step 1.1 directly controls the term by . If , the datum belongs to by the scale embedding. Apply smoothing with , then interpolation, to get . Insert the second estimate of step 1.1, use , and choose small enough to absorb the first term into the left side. Thus in both cases .
Apply the commutator estimate to at the chosen endpoint, square it and integrate. The resulting bound for the term in step 2.1 is a constant times the sum of the two integrals in the goal. Finally by the resolvent isometry. This proves the estimate.
Source notes
The article is cited for attribution of Lemma 4.3 and its proof strategy. The deduction above uses the stated suppliers and does not use the article's lemma as a premise.
Depends on
- Exterior and truncated obstacle domains
- Non-trapping obstacle
- Reference trajectory hypothesis W
- Dirichlet spectral Sobolev scale and duality
- Control region and nested real cutoffs
- Continuous and mixed time-space function spaces
- Resolvent-regularized adjoint and its forcing
- Forward and backward real-linear propagators
- Cutoff multipliers through order two and by duality
- Positive spectral Hilbert scale: duality and interpolation
- Lemma 4.2: smoothing of the regularized adjoint
- Integer resolvent commutator and localized first-order bounds
- Spectral interpolation and lower-order absorption
- The Axiom of Choice
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.
Sources
- Nonlinear Schrödinger equation in an exterior domain, v2 · PDF page 18, Lemma 4.3 and equation (4.4)