How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Homogeneous half-derivative local smoothing
PDF p. 7: (2.3); PDF p. 8: Proposition 3.1; (3.6)
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice and hypothesis (H): , is nonempty and compact with smooth boundary, its exterior is connected, and is non-trapping. Write for the Dirichlet Laplacian, for the spectral scale of , and for its evolution group. Let be a smooth, compactly supported, possibly complex-valued function, restricted to when used as a multiplier.
For every there is a constant , depending on the obstacle, and but independent of and , such that for all and ,
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
The exterior and smooth-boundary conventions are those of Exterior and truncated obstacle domains. Non-trapping uses complete rays: for every complete unit-speed admissible generalized reflected or glancing ray and every compact , there is with Non-trapping obstacle.
Under the Axiom of Choice The Axiom of Choice, the scale is the completion defined by spectral powers of Dirichlet spectral Sobolev scale and duality, and is its strongly continuous unitary evolution Scale isometries and free Schrödinger evolution. The time norm is the Bochner norm defined in Continuous and mixed time-space function spaces.
The imported homogeneous exterior smoothing estimate Imported homogeneous and retarded exterior smoothing applies on this non-trapping exterior, for every compact smooth cutoff and . It bounds by a constant independent of times .
Proof
[F1] The exterior and smooth-boundary conventions are those of Exterior and truncated obstacle domains. Non-trapping uses complete rays: for every complete unit-speed admissible generalized reflected or glancing ray and every compact , there is with Non-trapping obstacle.
[F2] Under the Axiom of Choice The Axiom of Choice, the scale is the completion defined by spectral powers of Dirichlet spectral Sobolev scale and duality, and is its strongly continuous unitary evolution Scale isometries and free Schrödinger evolution. The time norm is the Bochner norm defined in Continuous and mixed time-space function spaces.
[F3] The imported homogeneous exterior smoothing estimate Imported homogeneous and retarded exterior smoothing applies on this non-trapping exterior, for every compact smooth cutoff and . It bounds by a constant independent of times .
Given: The geometry, Choice assumption, cutoff, order, time and initial datum in the statement.
Goal: Establish the displayed squared integral estimate with a constant independent of and the datum.
The geometry and non-trapping assumptions in [F1], the Choice assumption, the cutoff and the order satisfy the hypotheses of [F3]. Its spectral spaces and evolution are the spaces and group fixed in [F2]. Therefore there is , independent of and , such that .
Square the inequality in step 1.1 and use the definition of the Bochner norm in [F2]. Taking gives the stated integral inequality, with the same independence from and .
Source notes
The article states the homogeneous estimate at (2.3) and restates it as Proposition 3.1, equation (3.6); its citation here is attribution. The proof above uses the independently sourced smoothing supplier, whose source record states its reading limits.
Depends on
Used by · 6
- Remark 3: loss, Littlewood–Paley input and Neumann estimates
- Localized free-flow bounds and compactness mechanism
- Local observation has a lower initial regularity cost
- Localization and analytic scope of the free control construction
- Lemma 4.2: smoothing of the regularized adjoint
- Proposed transfer of the smoothing-control mechanism
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.