Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Homogeneous half-derivative local smoothing

PDF p. 7: (2.3); PDF p. 8: Proposition 3.1; (3.6)

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice and hypothesis (H): n≥2, Θ⊂Rn is nonempty and compact with smooth boundary, its exterior Ω=Rn∖Θ is connected, and Θ is non-trapping. Write ΔD for the Dirichlet Laplacian, HDs(Ω) for the spectral scale of I−ΔD, and W(t)=eitΔD for its evolution group. Let η∈Cc∞(Rn) be a smooth, compactly supported, possibly complex-valued function, restricted to Ω when used as a multiplier.

For every s∈[0,1] there is a constant C>0, depending on the obstacle, η and s but independent of T and v0, such that for all T>0 and v0∈HDs(Ω),

∫0T∥ηW(t)v0∥HDs+1/2(Ω)2 dt≤C∥v0∥HDs(Ω)2.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

The exterior and smooth-boundary conventions are those of Exterior and truncated obstacle domains. Non-trapping uses complete rays: for every complete unit-speed admissible generalized reflected or glancing ray x:R→Ω‾ and every compact K⊂Rn, there is t≥0 with x(t)∉K Non-trapping obstacle.

[F2]

Under the Axiom of Choice The Axiom of Choice, the scale is the completion defined by spectral powers of I−ΔD Dirichlet spectral Sobolev scale and duality, and W(t)=eitΔD is its strongly continuous unitary evolution Scale isometries and free Schrödinger evolution. The time norm L2(0,T;HDs+1/2) is the Bochner norm defined in Continuous and mixed time-space function spaces.

[F3]

The imported homogeneous exterior smoothing estimate Imported homogeneous and retarded exterior smoothing applies on this non-trapping exterior, for every compact smooth cutoff and 0≤s≤1. It bounds ∥ηeitΔDv0∥L2(0,T;HDs+1/2) by a constant independent of T times ∥v0∥HDs.

Proof

[F1] The exterior and smooth-boundary conventions are those of Exterior and truncated obstacle domains. Non-trapping uses complete rays: for every complete unit-speed admissible generalized reflected or glancing ray x:R→Ω‾ and every compact K⊂Rn, there is t≥0 with x(t)∉K Non-trapping obstacle.

[F2] Under the Axiom of Choice The Axiom of Choice, the scale is the completion defined by spectral powers of I−ΔD Dirichlet spectral Sobolev scale and duality, and W(t)=eitΔD is its strongly continuous unitary evolution Scale isometries and free Schrödinger evolution. The time norm L2(0,T;HDs+1/2) is the Bochner norm defined in Continuous and mixed time-space function spaces.

[F3] The imported homogeneous exterior smoothing estimate Imported homogeneous and retarded exterior smoothing applies on this non-trapping exterior, for every compact smooth cutoff and 0≤s≤1. It bounds ∥ηeitΔDv0∥L2(0,T;HDs+1/2) by a constant independent of T times ∥v0∥HDs.

Given: The geometry, Choice assumption, cutoff, order, time and initial datum in the statement.

Goal: Establish the displayed squared integral estimate with a constant independent of T and the datum.

1.1givenF1F2F3

The geometry and non-trapping assumptions in [F1], the Choice assumption, the cutoff and the order satisfy the hypotheses of [F3]. Its spectral spaces and evolution are the spaces and group fixed in [F2]. Therefore there is C0>0, independent of T and v0, such that ∥ηW(t)v0∥L2(0,T;HDs+1/2)≤C0∥v0∥HDs.

2.1F2step 1.1∎

Square the inequality in step 1.1 and use the definition of the Bochner L2 norm in [F2]. Taking C=C02 gives the stated integral inequality, with the same independence from T and v0.

Source notes

The article states the homogeneous estimate at (2.3) and restates it as Proposition 3.1, equation (3.6); its citation here is attribution. The proof above uses the independently sourced smoothing supplier, whose source record states its reading limits.

Depends on

Used by · 6

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.

Sources