How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Scale isometries and free Schrödinger evolution
PDF p. 8: resolvent R and (3.4); (3.5)
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be the smooth exterior domain, its Dirichlet Laplacian, , and the associated completed spectral scale, all as in Dirichlet Laplacian and positive shift and Dirichlet spectral Sobolev scale and duality. Put and . For every , is an isometric isomorphism, is a strongly continuous unitary group on , and . In particular, for every and .
For such , belongs to and satisfies in , with . Here denotes its consistent bounded extension from to . This is the homogeneous Dirichlet evolution; the boundary condition is encoded by the Dirichlet realization and the spectral scale, without asserting a classical boundary trace for arbitrary .
Facts & Assumptions
The Dirichlet realization has self-adjoint with on the nonzero complex Hilbert space ; its spectral exponential is Dirichlet Laplacian and positive shift.
The scale is the completion of in . The spectral-scale contract gives the consistent onto isometries , extending , and ; it also gives the extension of and its commutation with scale powers Dirichlet spectral Sobolev scale and duality Positive spectral Hilbert scale: duality and interpolation.
For a self-adjoint generator on a nonzero complex Hilbert space, the spectral exponential is a strongly continuous unitary group, and on the generator domain its derivative is times the generator applied to the flow Flow calculus of a self-adjoint generator: commutation, invariance and differentiability. This supplier is mathematical; it assumes Choice and Countable Choice, the latter following from the assumed Axiom of Choice The Axiom of Choice.
Proof
[F1] The Dirichlet realization has self-adjoint with on the nonzero complex Hilbert space ; its spectral exponential is Dirichlet Laplacian and positive shift.
[F2] The scale is the completion of in . The spectral-scale contract gives the consistent onto isometries , extending , and ; it also gives the extension of and its commutation with scale powers Dirichlet spectral Sobolev scale and duality Positive spectral Hilbert scale: duality and interpolation.
[F3] For a self-adjoint generator on a nonzero complex Hilbert space, the spectral exponential is a strongly continuous unitary group, and on the generator domain its derivative is times the generator applied to the flow Flow calculus of a self-adjoint generator: commutation, invariance and differentiability. This supplier is mathematical; it assumes Choice and Countable Choice, the latter following from the assumed Axiom of Choice The Axiom of Choice.
Given: The domain, operators, scale, Choice assumption and in the statement.
Goal: Prove the isometries, commutation, conservation and the stated evolution equation.
Apply the scale contract to the operator in [F1]. Taking gives the onto isometry . The same contract gives the unitary extensions of and their commutation with scale powers, hence . Unitarity gives the displayed norm equality.
On the common core, by the spectral-scale commutation in [F2]; both sides extend continuously, so the identity holds on . As is an onto isometry and the group is strongly continuous on by [F3], is continuous in . The group law and inverse also extend from the core.
Put . On the core and then by continuity, . The range of is , so [F3] applied to differentiates in , with derivative . The scale-power isometries also give a bounded map ; since is bounded on , the identity map from to is bounded. Thus defines the stated bounded extension, and intertwining with identifies the derivative as in . Its continuity follows from step 2.1 and boundedness of .
Multiplying the derivative identity by yields . The group identity gives . The realization and scale in [F1]–[F2] specify the homogeneous Dirichlet evolution; no additional classical trace is needed for this scale-valued equation. Together with steps 1.1 and 2.1 this proves all assertions.
Source notes
The article supplies the scale-flow claims and evolution notation on PDF page 8, including (3.4) and (3.5). Its citation is attribution; the argument above uses the stated independent mathematical suppliers. The Physics-namespace supplier has domain mathematics and contributes no physical postulate.
Depends on
Used by · 40
- Theorem 1.1: exact outer boundary controllability
- Theorem 1.5: cubic internal control near a trajectory
- Corollary 1.6: quintic control near zero
- Linear damping decay and observability comparison
- Proposition 2.2: retarded local smoothing
- Homogeneous half-derivative local smoothing
- Strichartz estimate away from the obstacle
- Three-dimensional L4 time Linfinity space estimate
- Regularized lower-order observation remainder
- Localized free-flow bounds and compactness mechanism
- Lemma 3.2: compactness of the remainder
- Lemma 3.3: observability modulo a compact remainder
- Local observation has a lower initial regularity cost
- Integer resolvent commutator and localized first-order bounds
- Invisible initial-data spaces
- Locally constant invisible spaces are Laplacian invariant
- Vanishing of an eigenfunction invisible outside a ball
- Lemma 3.4: free unique continuation on the scale
- Scope of the spectral unique continuation argument
- Proposition 3.5: full-scale free observability
- Lifting zero-order observability to the order-two endpoint
- Linear forced well-posedness by Duhamel formula
- Scale Riesz map and free HUM operator
- Free HUM identity, coercivity and invertibility
- Theorem 3.6: bounded continuous control operator
- Mild formulation of the controlled power NLS
- Abstract nonlinear control-space hypotheses
- Lemma 3.8: energy-data time-integrable supremum bound
- Free and retarded bounds in the energy control space
- Proposition 3.10: order-two local control
- Remark 5: controllability above the Sobolev algebra threshold
- Forward and backward real-linear propagators
- Resolvent-regularized adjoint and its forcing
- Lemma 4.2: smoothing of the regularized adjoint
- Lemma 4.4: compactness for regularized perturbed trajectories
- Time cutoff bootstrap for invisible adjoint solutions
- Lemma 4.5: invisible solutions acquire energy regularity
- Duhamel formula for a real-linear propagator
- Linearized propagator bounds in the nonlinear control spaces
- Remark 6: exact use and zero-trajectory case of unique continuation
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.