Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Scale isometries and free Schrödinger evolution

PDF p. 8: resolvent R and (3.4); (3.5)

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let Ω be the smooth exterior domain, ΔD its Dirichlet Laplacian, A=I−ΔD, and HDσ(Ω) the associated completed spectral scale, all as in Dirichlet Laplacian and positive shift and Dirichlet spectral Sobolev scale and duality. Put R=A−1 and W(t)=eitΔD. For every σ∈R, R:HDσ→HDσ+2 is an isometric isomorphism, W(t) is a strongly continuous unitary group on HDσ, and RW(t)=W(t)R. In particular, ∥W(t)v0∥HDσ=∥v0∥HDσ for every t∈R and v0∈HDσ.

For such v0, v(t)=W(t)v0 belongs to C(R;HDσ)∩C1(R;HDσ−2) and satisfies i∂tv+ΔDv=0 in HDσ−2, with v(0)=v0. Here ΔD=I−A denotes its consistent bounded extension from HDσ to HDσ−2. This is the homogeneous Dirichlet evolution; the boundary condition is encoded by the Dirichlet realization and the spectral scale, without asserting a classical boundary trace for arbitrary σ.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

The Dirichlet realization has A=I−ΔD self-adjoint with A≥I on the nonzero complex Hilbert space L2(Ω); its spectral exponential is W(t)=eit(I−A) Dirichlet Laplacian and positive shift.

[F2]

The scale is the completion of D(A∞) in ∥Aσ/2u∥2. The spectral-scale contract gives the consistent onto isometries Jσ:HDσ→L2, extending Aσ/2, and A−r/2:HDσ→HDσ+r; it also gives the extension of W(t) and its commutation with scale powers Dirichlet spectral Sobolev scale and duality Positive spectral Hilbert scale: duality and interpolation.

[F3]

For a self-adjoint generator on a nonzero complex Hilbert space, the spectral exponential is a strongly continuous unitary group, and on the generator domain its derivative is i times the generator applied to the flow Flow calculus of a self-adjoint generator: commutation, invariance and differentiability. This supplier is mathematical; it assumes Choice and Countable Choice, the latter following from the assumed Axiom of Choice The Axiom of Choice.

Proof

[F1] The Dirichlet realization has A=I−ΔD self-adjoint with A≥I on the nonzero complex Hilbert space L2(Ω); its spectral exponential is W(t)=eit(I−A) Dirichlet Laplacian and positive shift.

[F2] The scale is the completion of D(A∞) in ∥Aσ/2u∥2. The spectral-scale contract gives the consistent onto isometries Jσ:HDσ→L2, extending Aσ/2, and A−r/2:HDσ→HDσ+r; it also gives the extension of W(t) and its commutation with scale powers Dirichlet spectral Sobolev scale and duality Positive spectral Hilbert scale: duality and interpolation.

[F3] For a self-adjoint generator on a nonzero complex Hilbert space, the spectral exponential is a strongly continuous unitary group, and on the generator domain its derivative is i times the generator applied to the flow Flow calculus of a self-adjoint generator: commutation, invariance and differentiability. This supplier is mathematical; it assumes Choice and Countable Choice, the latter following from the assumed Axiom of Choice The Axiom of Choice.

Given: The domain, operators, scale, Choice assumption and v0∈HDσ in the statement.

Goal: Prove the isometries, commutation, conservation and the stated evolution equation.

1.1F1F2

Apply the scale contract to the operator in [F1]. Taking r=2 gives the onto isometry R=A−1:HDσ→HDσ+2. The same contract gives the unitary extensions of W(t) and their commutation with scale powers, hence RW(t)=W(t)R. Unitarity gives the displayed norm equality.

2.1F2F3step 1.1

On the common core, JσW(t)=W(t)Jσ by the spectral-scale commutation in [F2]; both sides extend continuously, so the identity holds on HDσ. As Jσ is an onto isometry and the group is strongly continuous on L2 by [F3], t↦W(t)v0 is continuous in HDσ. The group law and inverse also extend from the core.

3.1F1F2F3step 2.1

Put x=Jσv0. On the core and then by continuity, Jσ−2v0=A−1x. The range of A−1 is D(A)=D(I−A), so [F3] applied to I−A differentiates W(t)Jσ−2v0 in L2, with derivative i(I−A)W(t)Jσ−2v0. The scale-power isometries also give a bounded map A:HDσ→HDσ−2; since A−1 is bounded on L2, the identity map from HDσ to HDσ−2 is bounded. Thus I−A defines the stated bounded extension, and intertwining with Jσ−2 identifies the derivative as iΔDW(t)v0 in HDσ−2. Its continuity follows from step 2.1 and boundedness of ΔD.

4.1F1F2step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1∎

Multiplying the derivative identity by i yields i∂tv+ΔDv=0. The group identity gives v(0)=v0. The realization and scale in [F1]–[F2] specify the homogeneous Dirichlet evolution; no additional classical trace is needed for this scale-valued equation. Together with steps 1.1 and 2.1 this proves all assertions.

Source notes

The article supplies the scale-flow claims and evolution notation on PDF page 8, including (3.4) and (3.5). Its citation is attribution; the argument above uses the stated independent mathematical suppliers. The Physics-namespace supplier has domain mathematics and contributes no physical postulate.

Depends on

Used by · 40

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.

Sources