How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Lemma 3.4: free unique continuation on the scale
PDF p. 11: Lemma 3.4
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice and (H): , the nonempty compact obstacle has smooth boundary, its exterior is connected, and is non-trapping, meaning that every complete admissible generalized ray , parametrized at unit speed and including reflected and glancing behavior, leaves every compact set in finite forward time. Let be the completed spectral scale of , the free Dirichlet evolution, and the real observation cutoff chosen as follows: fix with and require for , for , and for . For , let consist of the initial data for which in for every . Then for every and every . Consequently every such invisible free solution is identically zero.
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
The geometry and generalized-ray meaning of (H) are given by Exterior and truncated obstacle domains and Non-trapping obstacle. Choose with and the real cutoff of Control region and nested real cutoffs, with for , for , and for . Its derivatives through order two are bounded: the positive-order derivatives vanish outside the compact annulus and are continuous there, and .
Under Choice, is the completed spectral scale, and is the consistent free Dirichlet group with Dirichlet spectral Sobolev scale and duality Scale isometries and free Schrödinger evolution The Axiom of Choice. For , ; for , under the canonical injective scale embedding Invisible initial-data spaces.
For the fixed cutoff in [F1], for and , there are and a finite-dimensional complex space such that , identifying with its image in . Here is the consistent scale extension prop-se-invisible-invariant.
Every endomorphism of a nonzero finite-dimensional vector space over an algebraically closed field has an eigenvalue Every endomorphism of a nonzero finite-dimensional vector space over an algebraically closed field has an eigenvalue. Every nonconstant complex polynomial has a complex root, so is algebraically closed Fundamental theorem of algebra: every nonconstant complex polynomial has a complex root, by the definition of an algebraically closed field An algebraically closed field: every nonconstant polynomial has a root in the field.
Under Choice, an element satisfying in and invisible to in the test-pairing sense is zero, for any real and complex , on the connected exterior with the cutoff in [F1] Vanishing of an eigenfunction invisible outside a ball. Since the real cutoff in [F1] has bounded derivatives through order two, at order multiplication by the real cutoff satisfies ; every compactly supported smooth test function and its product with belong to Endpoint multiplier bounds extended to negative spectral orders Dirichlet spectral Sobolev scale and duality.
Proof
Given: Choice, (H), and .
Goal: Show for every .
With the fixed cutoff in [F1], apply [F3] at . Thus there are with and a finite-dimensional complex space invariant under the scale Laplacian, viewed in . The injective scale identification makes its restriction a complex-linear endomorphism of .
Suppose . By [F4], that endomorphism has an eigenvalue and a nonzero eigenvector . Thus in .
Since , its observation at time zero is in . Pairing this identity with any compactly supported smooth test function and using the real-cutoff duality in [F5] gives . Hence is invisible in precisely the test-pairing sense required by [F5].
The geometry, cutoff, eigenvalue equation and invisibility meet the hypotheses of [F5] at . Consequently , contradicting step 2.1. Therefore .
Since , time nesting gives . For every , scale nesting gives under an injective embedding. Thus , including the endpoint . An invisible solution has zero initial datum and therefore equals .
Source notes
The original article is cited for attribution of Lemma 3.4 and its spectral argument on PDF page 11. The deduction above uses the stated supplier interfaces; the article's conclusion is not used as a premise.
Depends on
- Exterior and truncated obstacle domains
- Non-trapping obstacle
- Dirichlet spectral Sobolev scale and duality
- Control region and nested real cutoffs
- Invisible initial-data spaces
- Scale isometries and free Schrödinger evolution
- Locally constant invisible spaces are Laplacian invariant
- Vanishing of an eigenfunction invisible outside a ball
- Endpoint multiplier bounds extended to negative spectral orders
- Every endomorphism of a nonzero finite-dimensional vector space over an algebraically closed field has an eigenvalue
- Fundamental theorem of algebra: every nonconstant complex polynomial has a complex root
- An algebraically closed field: every nonconstant polynomial has a root in the field
- The Axiom of Choice
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.