Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Lemma 3.4: free unique continuation on the scale

PDF p. 11: Lemma 3.4

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice and (H): n≥2, the nonempty compact obstacle Θ⊂Rn has smooth boundary, its exterior Ω=Rn∖Θ is connected, and Θ is non-trapping, meaning that every complete admissible generalized ray x:R→Ω‾, parametrized at unit speed and including reflected and glancing behavior, leaves every compact set in finite forward time. Let HDσ(Ω) be the completed spectral scale of I−ΔD, W(t)=eitΔD the free Dirichlet evolution, and φ∈C∞(Rn;[0,1]) the real observation cutoff chosen as follows: fix R>0 with Θ⊂BR(0) and require φ(x)=0 for ∣x∣≤R, φ(x)>0 for ∣x∣>R, and φ(x)=1 for ∣x∣≥R+1. For T>0, let NTσ consist of the initial data v∈HDσ for which φW(t)v=0 in HDσ for every t∈[0,T]. Then NTσ={0} for every T>0 and every σ∈[−2,2]. Consequently every such invisible free solution is identically zero.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

The geometry and generalized-ray meaning of (H) are given by Exterior and truncated obstacle domains and Non-trapping obstacle. Choose R>0 with Θ⊂BR(0) and the real cutoff φ∈C∞(Rn;[0,1]) of Control region and nested real cutoffs, with φ(x)=0 for ∣x∣≤R, φ(x)>0 for ∣x∣>R, and φ(x)=1 for ∣x∣≥R+1. Its derivatives through order two are bounded: the positive-order derivatives vanish outside the compact annulus R≤∣x∣≤R+1 and are continuous there, and 0≤φ≤1.

[F2]

Under Choice, HDσ is the completed spectral scale, and W(t) is the consistent free Dirichlet group with W(0)=I Dirichlet spectral Sobolev scale and duality Scale isometries and free Schrödinger evolution The Axiom of Choice. For T′≥T, NT′σ⊆NTσ; for −2≤σ≤σ′≤2, NTσ′⊆NTσ under the canonical injective scale embedding Invisible initial-data spaces.

[F3]

For the fixed cutoff in [F1], for T0>0 and σ∈[−2,2), there are T0/2≤a<b≤T0 and a finite-dimensional complex space N=Naσ=Nbσ such that ΔDN⊆N, identifying N with its image in HDσ−2. Here ΔD:HDσ→HDσ−2 is the consistent scale extension prop-se-invisible-invariant.

[F4]

Every endomorphism of a nonzero finite-dimensional vector space over an algebraically closed field has an eigenvalue Every endomorphism of a nonzero finite-dimensional vector space over an algebraically closed field has an eigenvalue. Every nonconstant complex polynomial has a complex root, so C is algebraically closed Fundamental theorem of algebra: every nonconstant complex polynomial has a complex root, by the definition of an algebraically closed field An algebraically closed field: every nonconstant polynomial has a root in the field.

[F5]

Under Choice, an element v∈HDσ satisfying ΔDv=μv in HDσ−2 and invisible to φ in the test-pairing sense is zero, for any real σ and complex μ, on the connected exterior with the cutoff in [F1] Vanishing of an eigenfunction invisible outside a ball. Since the real cutoff in [F1] has bounded derivatives through order two, at order −2 multiplication by the real cutoff satisfies ⟨φv,η⟩−2,2=⟨v,φη⟩−2,2; every compactly supported smooth test function and its product with φ belong to HD2 Endpoint multiplier bounds extended to negative spectral orders Dirichlet spectral Sobolev scale and duality.

Proof

Given: Choice, (H), and T0>0.

Goal: Show NT0σ={0} for every σ∈[−2,2].

1.1givenF1F3

With the fixed cutoff in [F1], apply [F3] at σ=−2. Thus there are a,b with T0/2≤a<b≤T0 and a finite-dimensional complex space N=Na−2 invariant under the scale Laplacian, viewed in HD−4. The injective scale identification makes its restriction a complex-linear endomorphism of N.

2.1assume-contraF4step 1.1

Suppose N≠{0}. By [F4], that endomorphism has an eigenvalue μ∈C and a nonzero eigenvector v∈N. Thus ΔDv=μv in HD−4.

3.1F2F5step 1.1step 2.1

Since v∈Na−2, its observation at time zero is φW(0)v=φv=0 in HD−2. Pairing this identity with any compactly supported smooth test function η and using the real-cutoff duality in [F5] gives ⟨v,φη⟩−2,2=0. Hence v is invisible in precisely the test-pairing sense required by [F5].

4.1F1F5step 2.1step 3.1discharge-contradiction

The geometry, cutoff, eigenvalue equation and invisibility meet the hypotheses of [F5] at σ=−2. Consequently v=0, contradicting step 2.1. Therefore N=Na−2={0}.

5.1F2step 4.1discharge-contradiction∎

Since a≤T0, time nesting gives NT0−2⊆Na−2={0}. For every σ∈[−2,2], scale nesting gives NT0σ⊆NT0−2 under an injective embedding. Thus NT0σ={0}, including the endpoint σ=2. An invisible solution has zero initial datum and therefore equals W(t)0=0.

Source notes

The original article is cited for attribution of Lemma 3.4 and its spectral argument on PDF page 11. The deduction above uses the stated supplier interfaces; the article's conclusion is not used as a premise.

Depends on

Used by · 3

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.

Sources