How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Locally constant invisible spaces are Laplacian invariant
PDF p. 11: Lemma 3.4 proof (ii)
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice and hypothesis (H): , the nonempty compact obstacle has smooth boundary, its exterior is connected, and is non-trapping in the generalized-ray sense. Choose with and fix a real-valued such that for , for , and for . Let and . Let be the Dirichlet spectral scale, its evolution, and the space of initial data whose observation vanishes in for every , using this fixed .
There exist such that is the same finite-dimensional space for every . For every , . Identifying with its image in under the canonical injective scale embedding, one has , where is the bounded scale extension.
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
For the fixed and in the statement, choose an auxiliary real cutoff equal to one on and supported in , as supplied by Control region and nested real cutoffs. The pair satisfies the cutoff hypotheses of Finite dimensionality of invisible spaces. Thus under Choice and (H), every formed with this fixed is finite-dimensional for and . For , the definition gives . def-se-invisible-space
The scale is the completed spectral scale of . Its canonical embedding is continuous and injective, and both levels are complex Hilbert spaces. Dirichlet spectral Sobolev scale and duality Spectral cutoff cores and unitary identifications of completed scales
The operators form a group on . For every , is continuously differentiable in with derivative ; is the bounded scale extension specified in the statement. Scale isometries and free Schrödinger evolution
A finite-dimensional complex linear subspace of a complex normed space is closed for the ambient norm. A finite-dimensional normed subspace is closed
The geometry and non-trapping convention in (H) are those of Exterior and truncated obstacle domains and Non-trapping obstacle. Full Choice is retained as an assumption of the scale and finite-dimensionality suppliers. The Axiom of Choice
Proof
[F1] For the fixed and in the statement, choose an auxiliary real cutoff equal to one on and supported in , as supplied by Control region and nested real cutoffs. The pair satisfies the cutoff hypotheses of Finite dimensionality of invisible spaces. Thus under Choice and (H), every formed with this fixed is finite-dimensional for and . For , the definition gives . def-se-invisible-space
[F2] The scale is the completed spectral scale of . Its canonical embedding is continuous and injective, and both levels are complex Hilbert spaces. Dirichlet spectral Sobolev scale and duality Spectral cutoff cores and unitary identifications of completed scales
[F3] The operators form a group on . For every , is continuously differentiable in with derivative ; is the bounded scale extension specified in the statement. Scale isometries and free Schrödinger evolution
[F4] A finite-dimensional complex linear subspace of a complex normed space is closed for the ambient norm. A finite-dimensional normed subspace is closed
[F5] The geometry and non-trapping convention in (H) are those of Exterior and truncated obstacle domains and Non-trapping obstacle. Full Choice is retained as an assumption of the scale and finite-dimensionality suppliers. The Axiom of Choice
Given: Choice, (H), the fixed and , and as in the statement.
Goal: Find a constant interval for the invisible spaces and prove the stated flow and Laplacian invariance.
Each dimension is a nonnegative integer. The nonempty set of these integers for has a least element; choose in that interval attaining it and choose with . For every , nesting gives and hence , while minimality gives . A subspace of a finite-dimensional space with the same dimension is the whole space. Thus all these spaces equal , which is finite-dimensional.
Let and . Since , its observation vanishes at every time in . For , the group law gives , because . Therefore .
Regard as a complex linear subspace of through the injective embedding. Its finite basis remains a basis of its image, so it is closed in that lower-scale norm. For , both and belong to , and hence so does . Differentiability at zero in makes these quotients converge to . Closedness gives .
Since is a complex linear space, multiplication by shows . As was arbitrary, in the stated lower-scale identification. This and steps 1.1 and 2.1 prove the conclusion.
Source notes
The original article is cited for attribution of the constant-dimension and invariance argument in the proof of Lemma 3.4 on PDF page 11. The argument above uses the stated mathematical suppliers; the article's conclusion is not used as its own premise.
Depends on
- Exterior and truncated obstacle domains
- Non-trapping obstacle
- Dirichlet spectral Sobolev scale and duality
- Invisible initial-data spaces
- Control region and nested real cutoffs
- Finite dimensionality of invisible spaces
- Scale isometries and free Schrödinger evolution
- Spectral cutoff cores and unitary identifications of completed scales
- A finite-dimensional normed subspace is closed
- The Axiom of Choice
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.