How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Corollary 1.6: quintic control near zero
PDF p. 5: Corollary 1.6; PDF p. 17: Proof of Corollary 1.6
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let and let be a nonempty compact obstacle with smooth boundary, connected exterior , and the non-trapping property that every generalized reflected or glancing ray leaves every compact set in finite forward time. Let , and . Let be the Dirichlet spectral space; in particular and with equivalent norms. Here is the closure of compactly supported smooth functions.
Choose containing and a smooth real cutoff which is zero on , positive on , and one on . There is such that, for every of spectral norms at most , a control and an integral solution satisfy , , the homogeneous Dirichlet condition, and in distributions on .
For the boundary conclusion, choose with , set , and , and let with its inherited norm. The trace is the Sobolev value trace. There is such that any of norms at most can be joined by with , , and a boundary control . They satisfy in distributions, , and . Thus the local internal and outer Dirichlet boundary conclusions remain valid for the quintic nonlinearity.
Statement references
Exterior and truncated obstacle domains
Control region and nested real cutoffs
Linear and nonlinear internally controlled exterior systems
Dirichlet spectral Sobolev scale and duality
States compatible with the uncontrolled obstacle boundary
Distributional equation convention for complex Schrödinger solutions
Facts & Assumptions
Exterior and truncated obstacle domains fixes the exterior geometry and ray convention. Control region and nested real cutoffs specifies the cutoff, and Linear and nonlinear internally controlled exterior systems specifies the quintic controlled equation and its Dirichlet evolution convention. Dirichlet spectral Sobolev scale and duality, States compatible with the uncontrolled obstacle boundary, Distributional equation convention for complex Schrödinger solutions and Continuous and mixed time-space function spaces specify the spectral spaces, boundary state space, distributional equation and time continuity. The Choice assumption is The Axiom of Choice.
For the stated geometry and cutoff, Proposition 3.9: energy-space local control gives small-data quintic internal control at with also in . Proposition 3.10: order-two local control gives it at . Low-order identifications of the Dirichlet scale identifies the integer endpoint spaces and their equivalent norms.
For these solution classes, Cubic and quintic energy-space nonlinear time estimates gives at , while Exterior H2 algebra and polynomial nonlinear estimates gives membership in at . Mild formulation of the controlled power NLS gives the integral equation, and Scale isometries and free Schrödinger evolution gives the unitary group and its generator action on sufficiently regular spectral vectors.
Lemma 3.11: extension preserving the obstacle Dirichlet condition supplies a bounded extension whose restriction is the identity. Transfer from exterior internal control to outer boundary control transfers a distributional quintic exterior solution with locally integrable forcing and nonlinearity to the stated outer boundary system and transfers the small-data radius through .
Proof
Given: The assumptions and notation of the Statement.
Goal: Establish the quintic internal control and then the outer boundary control for both endpoint orders.
Fix and apply F2 with . At use Proposition 3.9 and at use Proposition 3.10. The scale identifications convert their endpoint norms to the spectral norms in the Statement, shrinking the positive radius if necessary. This gives the required continuous control, integral solution, and endpoint identities for the chosen cutoff.
The nonlinearity and are integrable in time with values in by F3 and the continuity of ; hence both are locally integrable on space-time. The integral identity in F3 yields the distributional equation: pair it with a compactly supported smooth spatial test function, use the unitary group to move the group to the test function, and differentiate the resulting scalar convolution against a compactly supported smooth time test function. The generator acts on the spatial test function as , by F3; integration by parts in time gives . The Dirichlet condition is encoded by the spectral realization. This proves the internal assertion.
For boundary data choose the cutoff in F1 with . By F4, is bounded and preserves restriction to . Choose a positive boundary radius small enough that for . Step 1.1 supplies an exterior solution joining these extensions, and step 2.1 supplies its distributional equation and locally integrable terms.
Apply the quintic case of the boundary-transfer proposition in F4. Since vanishes on , restricting the exterior solution gives the homogeneous quintic equation there, the prescribed endpoints and zero obstacle trace. Its outer trace is the claimed continuous boundary control. This proves the boundary assertion and the corollary.
Source notes
The frozen article is cited for attribution of Corollary 1.6. The argument above uses the separately stated quintic control, spectral, extension and transfer suppliers; it does not use the corollary as its own proof.
Depends on
- Exterior and truncated obstacle domains
- Control region and nested real cutoffs
- Linear and nonlinear internally controlled exterior systems
- Dirichlet spectral Sobolev scale and duality
- States compatible with the uncontrolled obstacle boundary
- Distributional equation convention for complex Schrödinger solutions
- Continuous and mixed time-space function spaces
- Proposition 3.9: energy-space local control
- Proposition 3.10: order-two local control
- Low-order identifications of the Dirichlet scale
- Mild formulation of the controlled power NLS
- Scale isometries and free Schrödinger evolution
- Cubic and quintic energy-space nonlinear time estimates
- Exterior H2 algebra and polynomial nonlinear estimates
- Lemma 3.11: extension preserving the obstacle Dirichlet condition
- Transfer from exterior internal control to outer boundary control
- The Axiom of Choice
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.
Sources
- Nonlinear Schrödinger equation in an exterior domain, v2 · PDF page 5, Corollary 1.6; PDF page 17, proof